4 Years Ago Today

??
On May 9, 2023, a New York jury in civil case found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against Carroll, but found him not liable for rape by the New York state definition. They awarded Carroll $5 million in damages. :doubt:

So, now your defense of Trump is "well, he did not rape her, he just sexually abused her"

:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
Screenshot_20240314_002809_Opera.jpg
 
Post something! If you want to exchange tweets, go to twitter or X or whatever the hell they call it now.
 
Look at all those infected people returning from Europe and jammed into those airports before spewing out onto the general population.

Trump allowed that to happen
If it wasn't for the fiat printing press, we may be in the worst depression in human history that was helped massively by incompetent Prog politicians in cities and states.
 

Unvaxxed Comedian Ostracized & Smeared By Celebrity Friends w/ Jeff Dye​

82,278 views 13 hours ago
 

Coronavirus Fact-Check #1: “Covid19 is having an unprecedented impact on ICUs” The media claim this pandemic’s effect on hospitals around the world has never been seen before, but is that true?​

 

Coronavirus Fact-Check #3: “Covid19 is 20x DEADLIER than the flu!” One of the buzz-stats doing the rounds says this novel virus is far more dangerous than influenza, does the science hold up?​


". . . The World Health Organization has estimated Covid19’s “official” death rate at 3.4%, clinical studies done on Sars-Cov-2 put its actual case-fatality ratio at around 0.1%. Roughly equal that of regular season flu outbreaks.

The problem arises from what scientists and statisticians call “selection bias”:

the bias introduced by the selection of individuals, groups or data for analysis in such a way that proper randomization is not achieved, thereby ensuring that the sample obtained is not representative

Essentially, the way you choose your sample can have a huge impact on the results of your study.

In this case, since only the people sick enough to need treatment in hospitals or clinics are being tested, only those people with severe or critical symptoms will ever be counted in the statistics.

The WHO figure, for example, of 3.4% is based only on those patients who were treated in hospital.

But what about people who got sick but never reported it? Or who never had any symptoms so never knew they were infected?

Studies suggest that 50-80% of people infected with Sars-Cov-2 never experience any symptoms. Many others experience symptoms mild enough they never need medical treatment.

Accounting for these cases brings the death rate down by a factor of ten.

The countries that have done the broadest population studies – ie. testing random sections of the population who have no symptoms – are Germany, South Korea and Iceland.

They return death rates of 0.37% 0.6% and 0.4% respectively.

Dr John Ioannidis from Stanford University estimates a death rate between 0.025% and 0.65%. Another study, from Japan, found the death rate to be between 0.04 and 0.12.

These are both, potentially, markedly LOWER than seasonal flu.

In short: No, coronavirus is not “20x deadlier” than the flu. The science suggests it may be anything from very slightly worse, to noticeably better.. . . "


The way establishment medicine mandated folks were treated that were rushed into hospitals, long term care facilities, and long term care facilities, actually purposely increased the mortality rate. We know this now.

It had not a damn thing to do with Trump.

They even released dirt on the governor of NY, Andrew Cuomo, to avoid a scandal.

You are a disingenuous piece of lying shit.
 

Coronavirus Fact-Check #12: Ivermectin The anti-parasitic medication has been a bone of contention in the Covid debate for months. What is the argument about? And who is right?​


Coronavirus Fact-Check #13: “ICUs are filled with the unvaccinated” It’s become a common meme to refer to ICU’s being “filled” with the unvaccinated, but is there any truth to that?​



". . . Television presenters and news headlines across the United Kingdom have commonly referred to hospitals being filled with unvaccinated covid19 patients.

As if it could ever be considered evidence of anything, an anonymous “doctor” wrote a piece for The Guardian, which he filled with nameless anecdotal evidence, and emotively headlined:


ICU is full of the unvaccinated – my patience with them is wearing thin

This claim is regularly used as an argument for vaccine mandates, and/or unvaxxed-only lockdowns.

But is it true?

In a word, no.

ICUs are not “full” of unvaccinated covid patients, they’re not even full of covid cases. In fact, they’re not even full at all.

As of last week, NHS England’s own bed statistics reported that England has 4330 available critical care beds, of which 894 (21%) are being used by Covid patients, 2608 (60%) non-Covid patients and 828 (19%) were empty.

So, England’s critical care beds are not even 90% full, let alone 90% full of unvaccinated covid patients.

But let’s be charitable and assume these people misspoke or communicated their point badly. Let’s assume they meant 90% of covid hospitalisations are unvaccinated.

That, at least, is true right? Wrong.

The actual number is 35.4%

According to the UK’s Health Security Agency data (page 31 of this document) 6639 patients were admitted to hospital “with Covid” in the weeks 44-47 of this year. Of those 6639, 2355 were unvaccinated.

So unvaccinated people do not even make up the majority of Covid cases, let alone the majority of ICU admissions in general.

So, even going by the official statistics – which we’ve previously shown are routinely inflated to make the “pandemic” appear frightening – the claim is incorrect.

And that doesn’t even account for the fact that, according to Public Health England, a “Covid hospitalisation” is anyone admitted to hospital for any reason within 28 days of a positive Covid test. This could include people who are admitted to hospital for something else and then happen to test positive while they are there. . . "



IOW. . . again. LIES LIES LIES.

Every intelligent person now knows this. This is a really really bad look, for you to even bring this corporate-interlocking directorate psyop on the global population up, as an excuse to try to elect your clown, who was complicit.

We all know the truth. Many forgive Trump for being duped. Personally? I don't. No person with such a grave responsibility should let petty bureaucrats interested more in person financial gain, and the destruction of our national sovereignty get away with killing Americans for their gain.

Disgusting.

Heads should roll. . . for what they did, and now, instead, you want us to all bleev that Trump had something to do with this crime?


Seriously? :rolleyes:

 

Coronavirus Fact-Check #8: “New daily cases” and the second wave The media are renewing panic thanks to a “second wave”, but are we really seeing one? And what does “daily cases” actually mean?​

 
Look at all those infected people returning from Europe and jammed into those airports before spewing out onto the general population.

Trump allowed that to happen

Coronavirus Fact-Check #17: Masks STILL Don’t Work They’re trying to bring mask mandates back – but a new study says masks do exactly what they’ve always done: Nothing.​

 

Forum List

Back
Top