27 Months Or 104 Days

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
Americans pay the lion’s share of everything the United Nations and its agencies do. If that is not enough to satisfy the quislings, they are a heartbeat away from giving the UN taxing authority over the American people. Every United Nations treaty is a scheme formulated to achieve that goal. Democrats, and RINO, pretend that altruism guides their desire to ratify this or that treaty.

Informed Americans know that the federal government surrendered America’s absolute sovereignty to the UNIC (United Nations/International Community) a long time ago. Quislings laugh at common knowledge in that instance because the record shows they got away with it. Getting nailed for handing taxing authority to the UN is another matter. That’s why every one of them would bite off their own tongue before admitting they favor United Nations taxing authority.

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is the one they think might get job done because it contains everything propagandists dream about. I posted this message on December 3, 2012:



Let’s look at the CRPD today:

Remember Justina Pelletier’s predicament? Taken into “custody” more or less by doctors who changed her own physician’s diagnosis of a health concern, threw her parents to the wind, and said they – and only they – would be determining her treatment and future.

XXXXX

That, according to an organization that is opposing the move, is what would result more and more often should the U.S. Senate adopt the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.”

According to Taqiyya the Liar, and Typhoid Nancy, illegal alien children pouring into this country is for the children. The CRPD takes away parental Rights —— while it, too, is for the children:

Homeschooling and parental rights are endangered, the group explains, because “it would override existing state laws, seriously damaging state’s rights. It would surrender our nation’s sovereignty to unelected U.N. bureaucrats. And it is unnecessary because of the strong protections for people with disabilities provided by the Americans with Disabilities Act and other U.S. laws.”

Not that endorsements from Bob Dole or Samantha Power mean anything, but notice that Power is representing the United Nations over what is best for the American people. That is the Administration’s position and she’s just the America-hater to push it:

Politico reported this week on Sen. Bob Dole and his fight for the treaty, . . .

“Dole, U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power, more than 700 disabilities, veterans and business groups and a bipartisan group of senators are pushing for the treaty …” the report said. “They know they’ve built a much bigger, more expansive coalition than Farris and his allies – but they don’t underestimate Farris’ devoted base and the sway homeschool and pro-life groups have with many Senate Republicans.”

Parental rights in bull's-eye of Senate fight
Dire warnings issued as supporters try to advance 'disabilities' treaty
Published: 18 hours ago
BOB UNRUH

Parental rights in bull?s-eye of Senate fight

The polls open in 104 days. I do not think the quislings can get a UN treaty ratified in that time. Should the Democrats hold on to the senate they get an additional two years to ratify something. I’m convinced that ratifying a UN treaty is Taqiyya the Liar’s top priority at this point. I believe that because he does not talk about it. He talks about everything else and does whatever he wants to do in everything else, but he cannot ratify a treaty with an EO or a regulation.

I’ll close with a few excerpts from a column by Phyllis Schlafly written before Karl Rove’s Republicans handed the Senate to the Democrats in 2012 rather than help conservatives win seats:

The Republican Party platform may be the best one ever adopted. The party has long since learned that fiscal, social and sovereignty issues cannot be ignored or separated, but must be addressed as all part of a national campaign.

XXXXX

The platform endorses “American military superiority” as the cornerstone of our strategy to deter aggression and protect national security. Superiority disappeared from the Republican platform in recent years, but it’s now more than ever necessary because of Mr. Obama’s foolish statements about wanting a nuclear-free world, which would leave America at the mercy of dictatorships that ignore all treaties and promises.

It rejects a long list of United Nations treaties, including the treaty on women’s rights, the treaty on the rights of the child, the treaty on persons with disabilities, the arms trade treaty and the Law of the Sea treaty. The platform also rejects Agenda 21, including its proposal for a global tax and various U.N. declarations on the environment.

SCHLAFLY: Republican Party platform best yet
Reagan’s three-legged stool upheld
By Phyllis Schlafly - The Washington Times
Monday, August 27, 2012

SCHLAFLY: Republican Party platform best yet - Washington Times
 

Forum List

Back
Top