2020 outlook

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Tommy Tainant, Nov 6, 2019.

  1. Pogo
    Offline

    Pogo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2012
    Messages:
    111,027
    Thanks Received:
    15,422
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    Fennario
    Ratings:
    +55,419
    No shit. And you just tried to put it "under" the POTUS on no other basis than temporal coincidence.
    Are you on drugs?
     
  2. Jitss617
    Offline

    Jitss617 Gold Member

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2019
    Messages:
    24,802
    Thanks Received:
    2,290
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Ratings:
    +15,679
    I’m dead serious name somebody that was influenced
     
  3. HappyJoy
    Offline

    HappyJoy Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2015
    Messages:
    22,306
    Thanks Received:
    1,863
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +9,804
    By asshole I mean trustworthy, he already has an unhealthy relationship with Russia.

    It's also not a 'crackpot' conspiracy theory if multiple agencies have found it to be so. To blame it on some insider would be the unfounded conspiracy.
     
  4. Pogo
    Offline

    Pogo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2012
    Messages:
    111,027
    Thanks Received:
    15,422
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    Fennario
    Ratings:
    +55,419
    What will fuck us more than anything will prolly be what fucked us the last time ----- voters checking the box on the basis of "I've heard of this guy, I've seen him on TV, all hail TV, TV is my Master, must ... obey...TV".

    --which reminds us that POTUS elections are all about marketing and advertising, which in turn reminds us that advertising is the process of persuading the masses to buy stuff they don't need.

    As well as the age-old truism that "nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public".
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2019
  5. MisterBeale
    Offline

    MisterBeale Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2012
    Messages:
    23,131
    Thanks Received:
    4,530
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +19,665
    You are such a moron.

    That wasn't "Russian meddling."

    That was her own damn words.

    On top of that, no where has it ever even been proved that the Russians hacked the server. You idiots can take CrowdStrike at their word, the FBI can do so, but intelligent folks don't have to.

    THERE IS NO FORENSIC EVIDENCE. . . JUST, uh, yeah, it seems like it might be true.


    IOW FUCKING PROPAGANDA

    ‘Too Big to Fail’: Russia-gate One Year After VIPS Showed a Leak, Not a Hack

    ‘Too Big to Fail’: Russia-gate One Year After VIPS Showed a Leak, Not a Hack
    ‘Too Big to Fail’: Russia-gate One Year After VIPS Showed a Leak, Not a Hack
    'Too Big to Fail': Russia-gate One Year After VIPS Showed a Leak, Not a Hack

    A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack
    A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack – Patrick Lawrence

    Clinging to Collusion: Why Evidence Will Probably Never Be Produced in the Indictments of ‘Russian Agents’
    Clinging to Collusion: Why Evidence Will Probably Never Be Produced in the Indictments of 'Russian Agents'

    Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence
    Intel Vets Challenge 'Russia Hack' Evidence
     
  6. CWayne
    Offline

    CWayne VIP Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2019
    Messages:
    1,746
    Thanks Received:
    232
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Ratings:
    +1,193
    Is the recount already over?
     
  7. g5000
    Offline

    g5000 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    91,258
    Thanks Received:
    14,197
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Ratings:
    +53,488
    Wow. Such powerful delusions you have!
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  8. Jitss617
    Offline

    Jitss617 Gold Member

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2019
    Messages:
    24,802
    Thanks Received:
    2,290
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Ratings:
    +15,679
    Well she should have held on to her emails and not take a hammer to them
     
  9. kyzr
    Offline

    kyzr Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2009
    Messages:
    12,278
    Thanks Received:
    2,455
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +12,075
    One president is working hard to prevent opioid deaths and the others did not.
    Ending America's Opioid Crisis | The White House
    So is that temporal death graph indicative of policy or not?
    We need to see 2018-2019 deaths to confirm the death rate drop.
     
  10. MisterBeale
    Offline

    MisterBeale Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2012
    Messages:
    23,131
    Thanks Received:
    4,530
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +19,665
    First off, there is NO credible person on the planet that doubts the legitimacy of what is in the leaked emails.

    The corporate and government media want every compulsory educated, brainwashed serf on the planet to argue about whether those emails were stolen by an insider, or hacked by Russians.

    Do you know why? Because it distracts from the CONTENTS OF THE EMAILS, and their very, hugely corrupt and damaging implications.

    Defenders of the establishment, the DNC, the Democrats and liberals probably need to go back and read them. Otherwise, they are living in an alternate reality.

    THE CONTENTS ARE FAR MORE IMPORTANT THAN WHERE THE HELL THEY CAME FROM.

    Nobody influenced the election more than the corrupt DNC and Hillary herself. If they weren't? There would be no slime to reveal.

    It is that fucking simple.

    Nothing has been revealed, leaked or whistle blown on Trump that is as disgusting as what was released in those Wikileaks emails.

    Arguing about whether it was a leak or a hack is a giant distraction from the fact that you should run as from away from such a loathsome bunch of creepy corrupt people as run the DNC, THAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT.

    [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
    • Winner Winner x 1

Share This Page