2012 election the year that proved the TEA party is a sham

how about the facts that show the republican party has cheated in elections for decades?

Do you buy those cold hard court documented facts?

Face it you dont want honest
 
how about the facts that show the republican party has cheated in elections for decades?

Do you buy those cold hard court documented facts?

Face it you dont want honest

I'm calling for Reform, which you obstruct. You are a Fraud and a Cheat, you Charlatan you. :evil: :razz:
 
how about the facts that show the republican party has cheated in elections for decades?

Do you buy those cold hard court documented facts?

Face it you dont want honest

Face it you dont want honest

The only fact about you is that you look the other way when it comes to democrats.
 
from where i sit, it appears that the tea party has become a republican method of getting their politicians back in office. it's now far from what it was originally started for. but then again, is there anyone in the US that couldn't see what was going to happen to it?
 
from where i sit, it appears that the tea party has become a republican method of getting their politicians back in office. it's now far from what it was originally started for. but then again, is there anyone in the US that couldn't see what was going to happen to it?

Actually it represents the split between the Blue Bloods in the Party, both Parties, and those in the trenches. This is about restoration of sanity on the Political Spectrum. We are taking our Country back. Deal with it.
 
from where i sit, it appears that the tea party has become a republican method of getting their politicians back in office. it's now far from what it was originally started for. but then again, is there anyone in the US that couldn't see what was going to happen to it?

Actually it represents the split between the Blue Bloods in the Party, both Parties, and those in the trenches. This is about restoration of sanity on the Political Spectrum. We are taking our Country back. Deal with it.

This is about restoration of sanity on the Political Spectrum. We are taking our Country back.

Would newt and Romney be politics as usual?:lol:
I am sorry but that's was the first thing that flashed through my mind
 
from where i sit, it appears that the tea party has become a republican method of getting their politicians back in office. it's now far from what it was originally started for. but then again, is there anyone in the US that couldn't see what was going to happen to it?

Actually it represents the split between the Blue Bloods in the Party, both Parties, and those in the trenches. This is about restoration of sanity on the Political Spectrum. We are taking our Country back. Deal with it.

This is about restoration of sanity on the Political Spectrum. We are taking our Country back.

Would newt and Romney be politics as usual?:lol:
I am sorry but that's was the first thing that flashed through my mind

Yeah, sorta reminds me of when Dole ran. The Power of Legislation is with Congress, not the President. Supreme Court Nominations is another matter.

I'm less uncomfortable with Romney, though I am not into his Political view, I think he is a more honorable decent human being. The Puppet Masters do a good job of muddying up the waters. I don't like Handlers. We should expose them for who and what they are and expose their ties to both Parties.
 
Our country is in trouble...I think the reason they are behind Romney and Grinch is because they look to be the strongest...maybe not the best..but the strongest. We have to get rid of Obama...I am a Independent...If the dems put up a candidate that I felt could do the job I would vote for them. I am not happy with the whole bunch...I wanted a regular person to win like Cain...with a VP who had the foreign affairs experience. I will hold my nose and pull the lever for anyone but Obama. The Congress and Senate is a joke...get prepared my friends we are in for a hell of a ride.
 
Actually it represents the split between the Blue Bloods in the Party, both Parties, and those in the trenches. This is about restoration of sanity on the Political Spectrum. We are taking our Country back. Deal with it.

This is about restoration of sanity on the Political Spectrum. We are taking our Country back.

Would newt and Romney be politics as usual?:lol:
I am sorry but that's was the first thing that flashed through my mind

Yeah, sorta reminds me of when Dole ran. The Power of Legislation is with Congress, not the President. Supreme Court Nominations is another matter.

I'm less uncomfortable with Romney, though I am not into his Political view, I think he is a more honorable decent human being. The Puppet Masters do a good job of muddying up the waters. I don't like Handlers. We should expose them for who and what they are and expose their ties to both Parties.

Presidents appoint Justices which a activist justice is more dangerous than a congressman when it comes to right and liberty's
 
I have been to many Tea Party meetings...I would say the majority are blue collar, those that don't work are retired and the majority of them were blue collar.

You mean all those retired people that are surviving by socialism?

Living off the government dole?

Those retired people?
 
Define activism, bigreb.

0805_sotomayor-confirmed.jpg

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGssHxQ8FcU]Supreme Court Nominee Sonia Sotomayor advocates legislating from the bench - YouTube[/ame]
 
I have been to many Tea Party meetings...I would say the majority are blue collar, those that don't work are retired and the majority of them were blue collar.

You mean all those retired people that are surviving by socialism?

Living off the government dole?

Those retired people?

surviving on money they gave to the government to hold for them until it was time for them to retire.
 
surviving on money they gave to the government to hold for them until it was time for them to retire.

You mean the 3% of their income they gave, as opposed to the 6% people have to give today?

That 3% of their income that they then turned around and used for other expenses, claiming that they had only "borrowed" the money?

That money?

Yeah, that's gone. They spent it, and now they're using other peoples contributions.

So, they're living via socialism.
 
Last edited:
I only throw my support behind honest people.

And you support Romney?

True (21)
Mostly True (18)
Half True (29)
Mostly False (14)
False (16)
Pants on Fire (10)

Truth-O-Meter

She said Honest people Not totally honest people for a politician those are pretty good stats.:lol:
Compared to obama Romney's a Saint.

You might want to rethink that after reviewing the facts...

True (81)
Mostly True (77)
Half True (85)
Mostly False (42)
False (51)
Pants on Fire (5)

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/barack-obama/
 
And you support Romney?

True (21)
Mostly True (18)
Half True (29)
Mostly False (14)
False (16)
Pants on Fire (10)

Truth-O-Meter

She said Honest people Not totally honest people for a politician those are pretty good stats.:lol:
Compared to obama Romney's a Saint.

You might want to rethink that after reviewing the facts...

True (81)
Mostly True (77)
Half True (85)
Mostly False (42)
False (51)
Pants on Fire (5)

PolitiFact | Barack Obama's file

No I think I got it right.

List of Obama's Lies | Barack Obama Lies
 
surviving on money they gave to the government to hold for them until it was time for them to retire.

You mean the 3% of their income they gave, as opposed to the 6% people have to give today?

That 3% of their income that they then turned around and used for other expenses, claiming that they had only "borrowed" the money?

That money?

Yeah, that's gone. They spent it, and now they're using other peoples contributions.

So, they're living via socialism.

That was the deal do you support break the deal that was first promised from the government?
 
That was the deal do you support break the deal that was first promised from the government?

No, that wasn't the deal. The deal was changed.

The government started borrowing from the fund, and then turned up the rate of contribution.

And then people started having less children, later in life, and living to be longer.

So, if we were to stick to the deal, those people should have all the money that was "borrowed" to pay for other things deducted from their benefits.

Again, they are living off of the largess of the state at this point, because they didn't pay in enough to justify what they are receiving, and they spent it anyway.
 
The solution being to cut off the rate of contribution from any more increases until the budget is balanced, and to raise the retirement age until the generation that didn't contribute enough dies out.

But the Tea Party members that are living off of socialism would never go for that, now would they?
 
That was the deal do you support break the deal that was first promised from the government?

No, that wasn't the deal. The deal was changed.

The government started borrowing from the fund, and then turned up the rate of contribution.

And then people started having less children, later in life, and living to be longer.

So, if we were to stick to the deal, those people should have all the money that was "borrowed" to pay for other things deducted from their benefits.

Again, they are living off of the largess of the state at this point, because they didn't pay in enough to justify what they are receiving, and they spent it anyway.
You don't break a deal after it has been made. So tell me if they raise the rate after you retire then what?
 

Forum List

Back
Top