111th Congress Added More Debt Than First 100 Congresses Combined: $10,429 Per Person

teapartysamurai

Gold Member
Mar 27, 2010
20,056
2,562
290
(CNSNews.com) - The federal government has accumulated more new debt--$3.22 trillion ($3,220,103,625,307.29)—during the tenure of the 111th Congress than it did during the first 100 Congresses combined, according to official debt figures published by the U.S. Treasury.

That equals $10,429.64 in new debt for each and every one of the 308,745,538 people counted in the United States by the 2010 Census.

The total national debt of $13,858,529,371,601.09 (or $13.859 trillion), as recorded by the U.S. Treasury at the close of business on Dec. 22, now equals $44,886.57 for every man, woman and child in the United States.

In fact, the 111th Congress not only has set the record as the most debt-accumulating Congress in U.S. history, but also has out-stripped its nearest competitor, the 110th, by an astounding $1.262 trillion in new debt.

111th Congress Added More Debt Than First 100 Congresses Combined: $10,429 Per Person in U.S. | CNSnews.com

And then liberals think the answer to every problem is adding MORE spending? Adding more debt?

They wonder why Republicans won so big in November?

Goodbye 111th Congress! We will NOT miss you! :tongue:
 
Would you prefer that the democrats have let Bush Jr's depression wipe out the economy and replace it with bread lines?

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEh1ODkdn14[/ame]

So yes, they poured money into the economy but there was a very good reason for doing so. The alternative, thanks to Bush Jr and the republican "free marketeers," would have been far worse.
 
Granny says mebbe we could lay off a few o' dem politicians...
:tongue:
What happens if Congress doesn't rein in national debt?
March 8, 2011 - With the national debt at 90% of gross domestic product, the US could face a crisis if creditors raise interest rates, experts say.
What happens if Congress does not rein in the record $14.2 trillion national debt? A “crash landing,” cautions one business think tank. “If the US does not put its fiscal house in order, the reckoning will be sure and the devastation severe," said Eriskine Bowles and former Sen. Alan Simpson, cochairs of the president's deficit commission at a Senate Budget Committee hearing Tuesday. The country is "headed for the cliff," said Sen. Kent Conrad (D) of North Dakota, chairman of the Senate Budget Committee at the hearing.

The budget panel's top Republican, Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, speaks with equal urgency. The debt problem "runs the risk of a cataclysmic event, and it can happen very quickly,... just like it did in Greece." The trigger could be something simple, such as the US Treasury offers bonds for sale but there aren't enough buyers. Last year, the Treasury sold $8.4 trillion in securities at relatively low interest rates. But if bidders ever shy away, those rates have to rise. The United States, in effect, would need to pay creditors more to borrow from them. Because of the nation's skyrocketing debt base, the cost of a big rate increase could be ruinous.

"The simplest way is to put it in human terms: Your creditors decide that they don't trust you anymore. Your credit-card rate goes up to 29.999 percent per year," says Joseph Minarik of the Committee for Economic Development, the aforementioned business think tank. "In national terms, the question is: What if the Treasury threw an auction and nobody came?" The danger point is reached when gross national debt equals 90 percent of annual gross national product, say economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff, who studied the experience of 44 countries through 200 years. Their book, "This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly," has become a reference work for lawmakers in both parties – many of whom note the US crossed that threshold for the first time this year. (Gross national debt is debt held by the public plus money the US government owes to itself, such as commitments to fund Social Security and Medicare.)

Hitting that debt level probably does not endanger US solvency, but it may well tamp down economic growth, says Ms. Reinhart. Countries where debt levels have jumped above 90 percent of their GDPs have median growth rates that are 1 percent lower than countries with lower debt levels. "So there is reason to be concerned about a debt overhang, even if we don't have a full-fledged blowout under our nose," she says.

When might the 'cataclysm' happen?

It's impossible to know, but it has happened to countries whose debt, relative to the size of their economies, is less than that of the US. "The cataclysmic event," says senior fellow Alice Rivlin at the Brookings Institution in Washington, "is the perception that we're not a creditworthy partner.... At some point – and it seems likely to be very soon – our creditors will begin to worry that we're not credit-worthy, they will demand a higher price, and interest rates will go up."

Source
 
And the reason we are in so much trouble today is according to the Left and their GOD economist Paul
Krugman is that we just didn't spend enough...The look of disgust on his face is priceless when he says this.

These people are insane.Plain and simple.
 
So what? It is just paper. They can print more. Ask all the Jews on this board. We can print all the money we need to defend Israel. The international system will lend us all the money we want to defend Israel. Ask them. Central banking is good. The Fed is good. Printing money is good. Going to war for Israel is good. Killing Muslims is good. Fighting Iran on borrowed money is good. Giving Israeli advanced weapon systems from which they can sell the secrets to China is good. Knowing the truth about Palestine is bad.
 
And the reason we are in so much trouble today is according to the Left and their GOD economist Paul
Krugman is that we just didn't spend enough...The look of disgust on his face is priceless when he says this.

These people are insane.Plain and simple.

It was Cheney who said, "Deficits don't matter.", when he was stumping for Bush spending. So, I guess Obama took him at his word.

Go to Youtube and type: "Cheney deficits don't matter". You can get it straight for the horses' mouth. So, was he lying then or did he just believe his stupidity?

What you fail to realize is that both the GOP and Dems are Keynesians.
 
And the reason we are in so much trouble today is according to the Left and their GOD economist Paul Krugman is that we just didn't spend enough...The look of disgust on his face is priceless when he says this.

These people are insane. Plain and simple.

Krugman-in-Wonderland: Paul Krugman Smears Tom DiLorenzo and Ron Paul

So, if he is against Ron Paul, then is he right or is Ron Paul right?
 

Forum List

Back
Top