1,000s of negative responses to Huckabee's defense of Child Molester Josh Duggar

[Statistikhengst]

He likes young girls, did Bill Clinton friend him on Facebook?

Please show us where Bill Clinton did anything with an underage girl. Oh, and there's also that consent thing...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Statistikhengst]

What part of younger sisters do you fail to grasp? What part of without consent do you fail to grasp?

I fail to grasp none of it.

None of the parties involved were legally competent, with respect to Consent.

Including the so-called perpetrator.

Bullshit. A fourteen year old is old enough to know that molesting his younger sisters is wrong.

Thank you for your opinion.

Both the police and the judge who chose to expunge the record thought differently.

Your mileage may vary.

An expungement practically unheard of in Arkansas history, but when you are part of a now rich "Christian" family with deep political ties to powerful people, looks like anything is possible.

So much for morals and ethics.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

That's ironic coming from the Female Intern Humidor Cheerleading Section

Batshit crazy people like you might think this...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Statistikhengst]

And again, first time I heard of these clowns was when the LMSM needed to distract from the Obama Failures and Clinton scandals

Sure.... riiiiight....

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Wry Catcher]

Mike Huckabee attacked on Facebook for post DEFENDING Josh Duggar Daily Mail Online

Subtitle:

'You sir just lost my vote!': GOP presidential candidate Mike Huckabee attacked on Facebook for post DEFENDING Josh Duggar amid child molestation scandal

Some of the text:

Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee was hit with a barrage of furious criticism this weekend after he pledged his support to reality TV star Josh Duggar in the wake of his molestation scandal.

Several Arkansas Republicans have rallied behind the Duggar family, which is still engaged in state politics. Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar attended the kickoff event earlier this month for Huckabee, who supported the family in a post on Friday.

'Those who have enjoyed revealing this long ago sins in order to discredit the Duggar family have actually revealed their own insensitive bloodthirst,' wrote Huckabee.

Soon after, Huckabee himself became the focus of considerable bloodthirst.

'I respectfully disagree. His behavior is unforgivable to me and so is covering it up and allowing it to continue. Can't hide behind Jesus to excuse all bad behavior,' wrote Andy Dittmaier on Friday.


His comment has since received over 7,000 likes and is among thousands of other responses, many of them far angrier, to the former governor's post.

'You're DEFENDING these despicable people,' posted Kevin Carden. 'This is a big part of the reason you have never been successful in your campaign for the presidency.'

'You're DEFENDING these despicable people?' raged Facebook user Kevin Carden. 'This is a big part of the reason you have never been successful in your campaign for the presidency.'

'SIXTEEEN people executed in Arkansas while you were Governor, where was your belief in redemption then' Steve Scarborough asked the avowed evangelical politician. ....

I suspect that for GOP candidates riding the Evangelical circuit and milking the Evangelical cow, this is an issue that will not go immediately away.

I personally can understand that Huckabee wants to stick with his friends, but calling criticism of a now known child molester is not "bloodlust".

Do you support Mike Huckabee's continued support of Child Molester Josh Duggar?

Explain your reasons for YES or NO.

I can't answer yes or no, as facts necessary for me to make an informed judgement is missing in the reports I've seen on the news. Here's the problem:

• The age of the victims is unknown by me
• The police report was illegally released
• The Court disposition is unknown by me
• The elements of a crime are unknown by me
• The State and it's laws where the crime occurred is unknown to me
• No evidence that he is required to register as a sex offender has been posted
• Statutory Rape is no longer a crime gender specific, if two minors engage in sexual intercourse, both parties are guilty

 

[chikenwing]

yes greed is a christian value...look at the mega churches.....yes they all know who the duggars are...and they lie poorly even with all the practice they have had
.
There you go making up shit again,greed isn't a Christian value,where do you get this nonsense?? Its a human fault,not a value. Your bigotry is showing its self again?
I don't know who these Duggers are,and don't care.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

He likes young girls, did Bill Clinton friend him on Facebook?

Please show us where Bill Clinton did anything with an underage girl. Oh, and there's also that consent thing...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

Riiiiiiiiiight. He made multiple trips to his friends Epstein's Lolita Island to minister to the troubled underage sex slaves.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight

 

[Muhammed]

Democrats think the only appropriate "sex" possible is to screw an animal of the same sex in the butthole. And they must also have VD.

 

[Katzndogz]

There are thousands of leftists paid and unpaid.

 

[JoshuaZ]

Huckabee is not going to get the Republican nomination in 2016, so, I don't think it really matters much.

However, Huckabee's support had 'qualifiers' the size of Texas.

Did he not say that Duggar's conduct was 'inexecusable', albeit 'forgiveable'?

Is this not in keeping with a Christian pastor's ministry?

Are we not dealing with someone who was 14 years old at the time he reportedly fondled those young girls?

Are we not dealing with a situation where some measure of intervention was undertaken but in which no substantive charges were filed and in which the records of a juvenile 'suspect' were expunged so that - at law - it never happened?

Yes, the Liberals are having a field day with this one.

Tough break for the family, and the kid, not to mention the children who were fondled, now that this has come to light.

Primarily in agreement here, although I think there's a more serious issue that your post (and Huckabee) are not paying attention to, which is the general fact that the family in question never reacted to deal with the situation in any substantial way, in particular keeping the son well away from other young children.

I do think this isn't that important in that they are the lowest of celebrities and not really politically important at all. And I agree with your assessment that Huckabee is unlikely to win.

But, in another manner of speaking, it diverts some portion of Liberals' attention and energies away from more serious contenders.

While, at the same time, reinforcing for much of the rest of the country, just how petty and vindictive and vicious these little wankers can be.

Just in time to drive another nail into the Liberal political coffin, in the context of the 2016 General Election.

The cup is half-full, after all, even in bogus scenarios like this one.

I think you are underestimating how many of the people reacting to this are actually people who are fairly right-wing. This is not some liberal specific thing. I'm curious though, given your comment about the Liberal political coffin, does this mean you assign a very low probability to the Democrats winning the general election in 2016? How low?

 

[Statistikhengst]

He likes young girls, did Bill Clinton friend him on Facebook?

Please show us where Bill Clinton did anything with an underage girl. Oh, and there's also that consent thing...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

Riiiiiiiiiight. He made multiple trips to his friends Epstein's Lolita Island to minister to the troubled underage sex slaves.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight

Feel free to provide the video and audio evidence, also the court docket numbers, the legal complaints and the jury verdicts.

thanks!

 

[mudwhistle]

First, what ever happened to the word "alleged" before your descriptor of Duggar? I guess the court of opinion's verdict is final when the person in question is someone you don't like.

2nd, all we have so far is an admission something happened, not exactly what happened, so any opinions on Huckabee are moot at this point because we don't know exactly what the hell he is defending.

3rd, finally, how much of this criticism is from people who couldn't stand Huckabee BEFORE all this stuff came out.

This is coming from me, a person more in the Walker camp than anything else, and someone who has no use for evangelicals in general.

"Alleged" is not needed.

He AND his parents have already admitted that it happened. That makes him quite verifiably a Child Molester, exactly as I described him.

Nice try.

Or were you under a rock the last 7 days or so?

The admitted "something" happened, have we gotten the details yet?

If all this happened when he was 14, it is different from if it happened when he was in his late teens or 20's. I guess your feelings of compassion for juvenile defendants ends when you can score political points.

But keep this up, its typical for progressives to have to expand on something they see as political advantageous by overblowing the situation without further facts.

A fourteen year old is certainly old enough to realize that sexually abusing his younger sisters is wrong.

But he is not legally as liable as an adult. and again, we don't know exactly what happened yet.

No, he isn't as legally liable as an adult. That doesn't change the fact that he is an admitted child molester.

Sort like the prophet the honorable Elijah Mohammed, peace be upon him and his family.....

 

[rdean]

The Duggars are simply out of place. They should have known that, if one lives in Utah, one has several wives. If one lives in West Virginia, one practices incest. If they move, they may find themselves rehabilitated.

Does incest take practice?

 

[Ravi]

"Alleged" is not needed.

He AND his parents have already admitted that it happened. That makes him quite verifiably a Child Molester, exactly as I described him.

Nice try.

Or were you under a rock the last 7 days or so?

The admitted "something" happened, have we gotten the details yet?

If all this happened when he was 14, it is different from if it happened when he was in his late teens or 20's. I guess your feelings of compassion for juvenile defendants ends when you can score political points.

But keep this up, its typical for progressives to have to expand on something they see as political advantageous by overblowing the situation without further facts.

A fourteen year old is certainly old enough to realize that sexually abusing his younger sisters is wrong.

But he is not legally as liable as an adult. and again, we don't know exactly what happened yet.

No, he isn't as legally liable as an adult. That doesn't change the fact that he is an admitted child molester.

We still don't know what went on. If he is indeed a clinical child molester, other instances will come out of the woodwork, pathological child molesters don't stop. What actually happened needs to be released.

Unless not releasing it protects the innocent. IMO his life after he reached adulthood should be gone over with a fine toothed comb.

 

[rdean]

"Alleged" is not needed.

He AND his parents have already admitted that it happened. That makes him quite verifiably a Child Molester, exactly as I described him.

Nice try.

Or were you under a rock the last 7 days or so?

The admitted "something" happened, have we gotten the details yet?

If all this happened when he was 14, it is different from if it happened when he was in his late teens or 20's. I guess your feelings of compassion for juvenile defendants ends when you can score political points.

But keep this up, its typical for progressives to have to expand on something they see as political advantageous by overblowing the situation without further facts.

A fourteen year old is certainly old enough to realize that sexually abusing his younger sisters is wrong.

But he is not legally as liable as an adult. and again, we don't know exactly what happened yet.

No, he isn't as legally liable as an adult. That doesn't change the fact that he is an admitted child molester.

Sort like the prophet the honorable Elijah Mohammed, peace be upon him and his family.....

Except he's not a prophet and he's not Muslim.

 

[Ravi]

How many times have each of us heard about sexual dalliances between siblings? To some extent or another.

Are all of those who so-engage in their formative years to be considered 'child molesters'?

Personally, I find the concept abhorrent, as do a great many people, and have not experienced such things myself, but I know those amongst several families of our old acquaintance who have, and, of course, we are dealing with matters of law here.

What is the legal basis for such scrutinization? And by whom? Who passes judgment on a non-existent case? Who is qualified to do so?

What part of younger sisters do you fail to grasp? What part of without consent do you fail to grasp?

I fail to grasp none of it.

None of the parties involved were legally competent, with respect to Consent.

Including the so-called perpetrator.

Bullshit. A fourteen year old is old enough to know that molesting his younger sisters is wrong.

Thank you for your opinion.

Both the police and the judge who chose to expunge the record thought differently.

Your mileage may vary.

An expungement practically unheard of in Arkansas history, but when you are part of a now rich "Christian" family with deep political ties to powerful people, looks like anything is possible.

So much for morals and ethics.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

Not to mention that it happened just a couple of days ago. Something really stinks here.

 

[Ravi]

"Alleged" is not needed.

He AND his parents have already admitted that it happened. That makes him quite verifiably a Child Molester, exactly as I described him.

Nice try.

Or were you under a rock the last 7 days or so?

The admitted "something" happened, have we gotten the details yet?

If all this happened when he was 14, it is different from if it happened when he was in his late teens or 20's. I guess your feelings of compassion for juvenile defendants ends when you can score political points.

But keep this up, its typical for progressives to have to expand on something they see as political advantageous by overblowing the situation without further facts.

A fourteen year old is certainly old enough to realize that sexually abusing his younger sisters is wrong.

But he is not legally as liable as an adult. and again, we don't know exactly what happened yet.

No, he isn't as legally liable as an adult. That doesn't change the fact that he is an admitted child molester.

Sort like the prophet the honorable Elijah Mohammed, peace be upon him and his family.....

Yes, exactly like Mo. And you defend Duggar just like Mo's followers defend him.

 

[mudwhistle]

The Duggars are simply out of place. They should have known that, if one lives in Utah, one has several wives. If one lives in West Virginia, one practices incest. If they move, they may find themselves rehabilitated.

Ain't that the truth....

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

They should have known. It is all covered in chapter 2 of the book, "A Guide to Exploiting your Female Property".

Binders full of...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

Strawman......

 

[mudwhistle]

The admitted "something" happened, have we gotten the details yet?

If all this happened when he was 14, it is different from if it happened when he was in his late teens or 20's. I guess your feelings of compassion for juvenile defendants ends when you can score political points.

But keep this up, its typical for progressives to have to expand on something they see as political advantageous by overblowing the situation without further facts.

A fourteen year old is certainly old enough to realize that sexually abusing his younger sisters is wrong.

But he is not legally as liable as an adult. and again, we don't know exactly what happened yet.

No, he isn't as legally liable as an adult. That doesn't change the fact that he is an admitted child molester.

Sort like the prophet the honorable Elijah Mohammed, peace be upon him and his family.....

Yes, exactly like Mo. And you defend Duggar just like Mo's followers defend him.

Nope.....I just can see the motivations for the story.

There are more important issues out there folks.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Mike Huckabee attacked on Facebook for post DEFENDING Josh Duggar Daily Mail Online

Subtitle:

'You sir just lost my vote!': GOP presidential candidate Mike Huckabee attacked on Facebook for post DEFENDING Josh Duggar amid child molestation scandal

Some of the text:

Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee was hit with a barrage of furious criticism this weekend after he pledged his support to reality TV star Josh Duggar in the wake of his molestation scandal.

Several Arkansas Republicans have rallied behind the Duggar family, which is still engaged in state politics. Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar attended the kickoff event earlier this month for Huckabee, who supported the family in a post on Friday.

'Those who have enjoyed revealing this long ago sins in order to discredit the Duggar family have actually revealed their own insensitive bloodthirst,' wrote Huckabee.

Soon after, Huckabee himself became the focus of considerable bloodthirst.

'I respectfully disagree. His behavior is unforgivable to me and so is covering it up and allowing it to continue. Can't hide behind Jesus to excuse all bad behavior,' wrote Andy Dittmaier on Friday.


His comment has since received over 7,000 likes and is among thousands of other responses, many of them far angrier, to the former governor's post.

'You're DEFENDING these despicable people,' posted Kevin Carden. 'This is a big part of the reason you have never been successful in your campaign for the presidency.'

'You're DEFENDING these despicable people?' raged Facebook user Kevin Carden. 'This is a big part of the reason you have never been successful in your campaign for the presidency.'

'SIXTEEEN people executed in Arkansas while you were Governor, where was your belief in redemption then' Steve Scarborough asked the avowed evangelical politician. ....

I suspect that for GOP candidates riding the Evangelical circuit and milking the Evangelical cow, this is an issue that will not go immediately away.

I personally can understand that Huckabee wants to stick with his friends, but calling criticism of a now known child molester is not "bloodlust".

Do you support Mike Huckabee's continued support of Child Molester Josh Duggar?

Explain your reasons for YES or NO.

That is a completely dishonest OP by a dishonest partisan.

 

[pwjohn]

mudd its been all over the news.....and no one is telling anyone to be shocked....i find the whole think shocking and disgusting..his so call...apology is just a serious of 'i' and 'me' ......very little concern for his victims or the truth...this is truly not a left or right issue....this is simply a child molester who has been exposed...his parents did him no favors covering hits up for all these years...and i just dont believe there were only 5 victims but that will come out....as this has....and as i have said they did what parents do...protect their son...but where was the protection for their daughters....and knowing you have this secret you go on nation tv

I don't watch "The News".

Basically a liberal press.....bought and paid for by Democrats...spoonfeeding your news to you so they can shape your opinions and warp your morals along with your sense of what is right and what is wrong. Turning decent people into total idiots.
Nope.....Don't watch it.

Why is that ?