1,000s of negative responses to Huckabee's defense of Child Molester Josh Duggar

[pwjohn]

This is interesting. First off I don't consider huckabee a true candidate in the primary process because he's more like a messenger in search of a soapbox to promote his agenda.

As for huckabee stupidly offering his support for the duggar family, he knows full well he's gonna have to throw them under the bus where they belong, and soon, or risk losing that all important and very expensive soapbox he needs to promote his agenda during the primary process.

As for the duggar family brand name, they're now damaged goods for obvious reasons and should disappear into the woodwork where they belong.

It's a shame to see the high & mighty fall so far, and so fast, but you know what they say. Shit happens. The duggar family, based on their own professed beliefs, failed the victims in this case in the worst sort of way, and so are more than deserving of the beat down they are now receiving. Again based on their own professed beliefs.

 

[mudwhistle]

mudd its been all over the news.....and no one is telling anyone to be shocked....i find the whole think shocking and disgusting..his so call...apology is just a serious of 'i' and 'me' ......very little concern for his victims or the truth...this is truly not a left or right issue....this is simply a child molester who has been exposed...his parents did him no favors covering hits up for all these years...and i just dont believe there were only 5 victims but that will come out....as this has....and as i have said they did what parents do...protect their son...but where was the protection for their daughters....and knowing you have this secret you go on nation tv

I don't watch "The News".

Basically a liberal press.....bought and paid for by Democrats...spoonfeeding your news to you so they can shape your opinions and warp your morals along with your sense of what is right and what is wrong. Turning decent people into total idiots.
Nope.....Don't watch it.

 

[Statistikhengst]

yes greed is a christian value...look at the mega churches.....yes they all know who the duggars are...and they lie poorly even with all the practice they have had

Must be a bitch, sittin' on the outside, lookin' in, eh?

Uhm, no.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[martybegan]

Mike Huckabee attacked on Facebook for post DEFENDING Josh Duggar Daily Mail Online

Subtitle:

'You sir just lost my vote!': GOP presidential candidate Mike Huckabee attacked on Facebook for post DEFENDING Josh Duggar amid child molestation scandal

Some of the text:

Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee was hit with a barrage of furious criticism this weekend after he pledged his support to reality TV star Josh Duggar in the wake of his molestation scandal.

Several Arkansas Republicans have rallied behind the Duggar family, which is still engaged in state politics. Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar attended the kickoff event earlier this month for Huckabee, who supported the family in a post on Friday.

'Those who have enjoyed revealing this long ago sins in order to discredit the Duggar family have actually revealed their own insensitive bloodthirst,' wrote Huckabee.

Soon after, Huckabee himself became the focus of considerable bloodthirst.

'I respectfully disagree. His behavior is unforgivable to me and so is covering it up and allowing it to continue. Can't hide behind Jesus to excuse all bad behavior,' wrote Andy Dittmaier on Friday.


His comment has since received over 7,000 likes and is among thousands of other responses, many of them far angrier, to the former governor's post.

'You're DEFENDING these despicable people,' posted Kevin Carden. 'This is a big part of the reason you have never been successful in your campaign for the presidency.'

'You're DEFENDING these despicable people?' raged Facebook user Kevin Carden. 'This is a big part of the reason you have never been successful in your campaign for the presidency.'

'SIXTEEEN people executed in Arkansas while you were Governor, where was your belief in redemption then' Steve Scarborough asked the avowed evangelical politician. ....

I suspect that for GOP candidates riding the Evangelical circuit and milking the Evangelical cow, this is an issue that will not go immediately away.

I personally can understand that Huckabee wants to stick with his friends, but calling criticism of a now known child molester is not "bloodlust".

Do you support Mike Huckabee's continued support of Child Molester Josh Duggar?

Explain your reasons for YES or NO.

First, what ever happened to the word "alleged" before your descriptor of Duggar? I guess the court of opinion's verdict is final when the person in question is someone you don't like.

2nd, all we have so far is an admission something happened, not exactly what happened, so any opinions on Huckabee are moot at this point because we don't know exactly what the hell he is defending.

3rd, finally, how much of this criticism is from people who couldn't stand Huckabee BEFORE all this stuff came out.

This is coming from me, a person more in the Walker camp than anything else, and someone who has no use for evangelicals in general.

"Alleged" is not needed.

He AND his parents have already admitted that it happened. That makes him quite verifiably a Child Molester, exactly as I described him.

Nice try.

Or were you under a rock the last 7 days or so?

The admitted "something" happened, have we gotten the details yet?

If all this happened when he was 14, it is different from if it happened when he was in his late teens or 20's. I guess your feelings of compassion for juvenile defendants ends when you can score political points.

But keep this up, its typical for progressives to have to expand on something they see as political advantageous by overblowing the situation without further facts.

A fourteen year old is certainly old enough to realize that sexually abusing his younger sisters is wrong.

But he is not legally as liable as an adult. and again, we don't know exactly what happened yet.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Huckabee as irrelevant as Hillary soon will be

Yeah, you keep on believing that.... lol....

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Vandalshandle]

The Duggars are simply out of place. They should have known that, if one lives in Utah, one has several wives. If one lives in West Virginia, one practices incest. If they move, they may find themselves rehabilitated.

 

[Statistikhengst]

...Child molesters apparently never grow away from their desire to molest children. This guy's life should be scrutinized to the extreme.

How many times have each of us heard about sexual dalliances between siblings? To some extent or another.

Are all of those who so-engage in their formative years to be considered 'child molesters'?

Personally, I find the concept abhorrent, as do a great many people, and have not experienced such things myself, but I know those amongst several families of our old acquaintance who have, and, of course, we are dealing with matters of law here.

What is the legal basis for such scrutinization? And by whom? Who passes judgment on a non-existent case? Who is qualified to do so?

Yeah, what's wrong with "stick yer something something in her pussy" among siblings, right? Whee!!!

... that is just utterly batshit crazy.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Statistikhengst]

wasnt he 9 years older than the victims?

Yeah... I thought I heard something to that effect... sounds creepy, to me, if it's true.

It is true.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Statistikhengst]

...Child molesters apparently never grow away from their desire to molest children. This guy's life should be scrutinized to the extreme.

How many times have each of us heard about sexual dalliances between siblings? To some extent or another.

Are all of those who so-engage in their formative years to be considered 'child molesters'?

Personally, I find the concept abhorrent, as do a great many people, and have not experienced such things myself, but I know those amongst several families of our old acquaintance who have, and, of course, we are dealing with matters of law here.

What is the legal basis for such scrutinization? And by whom? Who passes judgment on a non-existent case? Who is qualified to do so?

What part of younger sisters do you fail to grasp? What part of without consent do you fail to grasp?

I fail to grasp none of it.

None of the parties involved were legally competent, with respect to Consent.

Including the so-called perpetrator.

Bullshit. A fourteen year old is old enough to know that molesting his younger sisters is wrong.

Especially considering the fine Christian upbringing he was supposed to be enjoying.

The apple does not fall far from the tree.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Ravi]

Mike Huckabee attacked on Facebook for post DEFENDING Josh Duggar Daily Mail Online

Subtitle:

Some of the text:

I suspect that for GOP candidates riding the Evangelical circuit and milking the Evangelical cow, this is an issue that will not go immediately away.

I personally can understand that Huckabee wants to stick with his friends, but calling criticism of a now known child molester is not "bloodlust".

Do you support Mike Huckabee's continued support of Child Molester Josh Duggar?

Explain your reasons for YES or NO.

First, what ever happened to the word "alleged" before your descriptor of Duggar? I guess the court of opinion's verdict is final when the person in question is someone you don't like.

2nd, all we have so far is an admission something happened, not exactly what happened, so any opinions on Huckabee are moot at this point because we don't know exactly what the hell he is defending.

3rd, finally, how much of this criticism is from people who couldn't stand Huckabee BEFORE all this stuff came out.

This is coming from me, a person more in the Walker camp than anything else, and someone who has no use for evangelicals in general.

"Alleged" is not needed.

He AND his parents have already admitted that it happened. That makes him quite verifiably a Child Molester, exactly as I described him.

Nice try.

Or were you under a rock the last 7 days or so?

The admitted "something" happened, have we gotten the details yet?

If all this happened when he was 14, it is different from if it happened when he was in his late teens or 20's. I guess your feelings of compassion for juvenile defendants ends when you can score political points.

But keep this up, its typical for progressives to have to expand on something they see as political advantageous by overblowing the situation without further facts.

A fourteen year old is certainly old enough to realize that sexually abusing his younger sisters is wrong.

But he is not legally as liable as an adult. and again, we don't know exactly what happened yet.

No, he isn't as legally liable as an adult. That doesn't change the fact that he is an admitted child molester.

 

[martybegan]

First, what ever happened to the word "alleged" before your descriptor of Duggar? I guess the court of opinion's verdict is final when the person in question is someone you don't like.

2nd, all we have so far is an admission something happened, not exactly what happened, so any opinions on Huckabee are moot at this point because we don't know exactly what the hell he is defending.

3rd, finally, how much of this criticism is from people who couldn't stand Huckabee BEFORE all this stuff came out.

This is coming from me, a person more in the Walker camp than anything else, and someone who has no use for evangelicals in general.

"Alleged" is not needed.

He AND his parents have already admitted that it happened. That makes him quite verifiably a Child Molester, exactly as I described him.

Nice try.

Or were you under a rock the last 7 days or so?

The admitted "something" happened, have we gotten the details yet?

If all this happened when he was 14, it is different from if it happened when he was in his late teens or 20's. I guess your feelings of compassion for juvenile defendants ends when you can score political points.

But keep this up, its typical for progressives to have to expand on something they see as political advantageous by overblowing the situation without further facts.

A fourteen year old is certainly old enough to realize that sexually abusing his younger sisters is wrong.

But he is not legally as liable as an adult. and again, we don't know exactly what happened yet.

No, he isn't as legally liable as an adult. That doesn't change the fact that he is an admitted child molester.

We still don't know what went on. If he is indeed a clinical child molester, other instances will come out of the woodwork, pathological child molesters don't stop. What actually happened needs to be released.

 

[Statistikhengst]

...Child molesters apparently never grow away from their desire to molest children. This guy's life should be scrutinized to the extreme.

How many times have each of us heard about sexual dalliances between siblings? To some extent or another.

Are all of those who so-engage in their formative years to be considered 'child molesters'?

Personally, I find the concept abhorrent, as do a great many people, and have not experienced such things myself, but I know those amongst several families of our old acquaintance who have, and, of course, we are dealing with matters of law here.

What is the legal basis for such scrutinization? And by whom? Who passes judgment on a non-existent case? Who is qualified to do so?

What part of younger sisters do you fail to grasp? What part of without consent do you fail to grasp?

I fail to grasp none of it.

None of the parties involved were legally competent, with respect to Consent.

Including the so-called perpetrator.

Bullshit. A fourteen year old is old enough to know that molesting his younger sisters is wrong.

Thank you for your opinion.

Both the police and the judge who chose to expunge the record thought differently.

Your mileage may vary.

An expungement practically unheard of in Arkansas history, but when you are part of a now rich "Christian" family with deep political ties to powerful people, looks like anything is possible.

So much for morals and ethics.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Statistikhengst]

How many times have each of us heard about sexual dalliances between siblings? To some extent or another.

Are all of those who so-engage in their formative years to be considered 'child molesters'?

Personally, I find the concept abhorrent, as do a great many people, and have not experienced such things myself, but I know those amongst several families of our old acquaintance who have, and, of course, we are dealing with matters of law here.

What is the legal basis for such scrutinization? And by whom? Who passes judgment on a non-existent case? Who is qualified to do so?

What part of younger sisters do you fail to grasp? What part of without consent do you fail to grasp?

I fail to grasp none of it.

None of the parties involved were legally competent, with respect to Consent.

Including the so-called perpetrator.

Bullshit. A fourteen year old is old enough to know that molesting his younger sisters is wrong.

Thank you for your opinion.

Both the police and the judge who chose to expunge the record thought differently.

Your mileage may vary.

Adding unethical behavior to unethical behavior. Priceless.

Seems to be in among some Christians these days.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Statistikhengst]

The Duggars are simply out of place. They should have known that, if one lives in Utah, one has several wives. If one lives in West Virginia, one practices incest. If they move, they may find themselves rehabilitated.

Ain't that the truth....

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Statistikhengst]

First, what ever happened to the word "alleged" before your descriptor of Duggar? I guess the court of opinion's verdict is final when the person in question is someone you don't like.

2nd, all we have so far is an admission something happened, not exactly what happened, so any opinions on Huckabee are moot at this point because we don't know exactly what the hell he is defending.

3rd, finally, how much of this criticism is from people who couldn't stand Huckabee BEFORE all this stuff came out.

This is coming from me, a person more in the Walker camp than anything else, and someone who has no use for evangelicals in general.

"Alleged" is not needed.

He AND his parents have already admitted that it happened. That makes him quite verifiably a Child Molester, exactly as I described him.

Nice try.

Or were you under a rock the last 7 days or so?

The admitted "something" happened, have we gotten the details yet?

If all this happened when he was 14, it is different from if it happened when he was in his late teens or 20's. I guess your feelings of compassion for juvenile defendants ends when you can score political points.

But keep this up, its typical for progressives to have to expand on something they see as political advantageous by overblowing the situation without further facts.

A fourteen year old is certainly old enough to realize that sexually abusing his younger sisters is wrong.

But he is not legally as liable as an adult. and again, we don't know exactly what happened yet.

No, he isn't as legally liable as an adult. That doesn't change the fact that he is an admitted child molester.

Spot-on.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Vandalshandle]

The Duggars are simply out of place. They should have known that, if one lives in Utah, one has several wives. If one lives in West Virginia, one practices incest. If they move, they may find themselves rehabilitated.

Ain't that the truth....

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

They should have known. It is all covered in chapter 2 of the book, "A Guide to Exploiting your Female Property".

 

[CrusaderFrank]

He likes young girls, did Bill Clinton friend him on Facebook?

 

[Statistikhengst]

The Duggars are simply out of place. They should have known that, if one lives in Utah, one has several wives. If one lives in West Virginia, one practices incest. If they move, they may find themselves rehabilitated.

Ain't that the truth....

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

They should have known. It is all covered in chapter 2 of the book, "A Guide to Exploiting your Female Property".

Binders full of...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[CrusaderFrank]

How many times have each of us heard about sexual dalliances between siblings? To some extent or another.

Are all of those who so-engage in their formative years to be considered 'child molesters'?

Personally, I find the concept abhorrent, as do a great many people, and have not experienced such things myself, but I know those amongst several families of our old acquaintance who have, and, of course, we are dealing with matters of law here.

What is the legal basis for such scrutinization? And by whom? Who passes judgment on a non-existent case? Who is qualified to do so?

What part of younger sisters do you fail to grasp? What part of without consent do you fail to grasp?

I fail to grasp none of it.

None of the parties involved were legally competent, with respect to Consent.

Including the so-called perpetrator.

Bullshit. A fourteen year old is old enough to know that molesting his younger sisters is wrong.

Thank you for your opinion.

Both the police and the judge who chose to expunge the record thought differently.

Your mileage may vary.

An expungement practically unheard of in Arkansas history, but when you are part of a now rich "Christian" family with deep political ties to powerful people, looks like anything is possible.

So much for morals and ethics.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

That's ironic coming from the Female Intern Humidor Cheerleading Section

 

[CrusaderFrank]

And again, first time I heard of these clowns was when the LMSM needed to distract from the Obama Failures and Clinton scandals