- Thread starter
- #241
Why is this level of theoretical 'GW' an issue?
Because of trends like this:

Keeling Curve - Wikipedia
and this:

Global surface temperature - Wikipedia
And consequences like this:
welcome | Sea Level Research Group
and this:

Mass balance of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets from 1992 to 2020
Abstract. Ice losses from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have accelerated since the 1990s, accounting for a significant increase in the global mean sea level. Here, we present a new 29-year record of ice sheet mass balance from 1992 to 2020 from the Ice Sheet Mass Balance...
and this:
and this:

Concurrent heat waves becoming more frequent
Multiple large heatwaves the size of Mongolia occurred at the same time nearly every day during the warm seasons of the 2010s across the Northern Hemisphere, according to a study led by Washington State University researchers.
and this:

Ocean heat content - Wikipedia
Where have you been hiding? We would address the issue by eliminating GHG emissions as quickly as possible. You know: solar and wind, EVs, other non-emitting energy technologies. We can also stop deforestation and even work on reforestation. There is the possibility of actively removing CO2 from the atmosphere and even of blocking small portions of the sun's radiation towards the Earth. Both of those are actions that can be stopped, so please don't charge me of risking the planet by excessively lowering CO2.How would we address the actual cause if it was proven?
Last edited: