- Thread starter
- #101
I am not here on this thread to discuss what each State did or did not do, this is about the overall benefit or consequence nationally.What did raising the minimum wage do in California?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am not here on this thread to discuss what each State did or did not do, this is about the overall benefit or consequence nationally.What did raising the minimum wage do in California?
You should learn how to read graphs.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Shows job growth steady under both Rep. and Dem. POTUS, when adjusting for events;
Sept. 11, 2001 dip down,
Housing loan bubble bust of @ 2008-2009,
COVID shutdowns/lockdowns 2020 (mostly by State Govenors, mostly Democrat ones).
Again, no distinguish between private/wealth creation sector or public/wealth "redistribution"(Guvmint) sector.
Another item essential to be measured but not much data presented by any here is the median wage and benefits changes over these timespans. Lots of minimum wage jobs not the same as ones with more livable wage and benefits.
Thanks for giving me your opinion. Nonetheless, your opinion is worthless because I am no communist. I was a Republican for 35 years and believe in many of the Republican ideals. I am not a fan of the Far Right (all extremes are bad) and I am not a fan of assumptions or speculation. Give me data, statistics and facts. Otherwise,Inflation is inflation. Taxes are taxes. Communists you are.
Raising the minimum wage would work nationally the same way it works in California.I am not here on this thread to discuss what each State did or did not do, this is about the overall benefit or consequence nationally.
Words, words, and more words. Show me articles that prove your words.
All they have are excuses.
Bill Clinton stated this evening that since 1989, 51 million new jobs have been created and under the Democrats, of those 51, 49 million were created under Democratic presidents and only 2 million were created under Republican presidents.
Clinton said he had to check it 3 times but that it was confirmed.
Here is a link to one of the articles that confirms that information:
“Since 1989 and a new age of globalization began, 51 million jobs have been created in America. 49 million, 96%, have been created under Democratic presidents.”
This means that more Americans were working under Democratic rule than under Republican presidents. More people working means a better economy, better lives, and better life for all.
This is also something that is true and that has been confirmed 100%
View attachment 999299
Oh yeah, they want something like this to changeRaising the minimum wage would work nationally the same way it works in California.
After many years of listening to the fol de rol of Raising the minimum wage (by the way, never a benefit to the poor) I conclude that no one cares about the minimum wage. They want the business owners to make less profit.
The "far right" as you so glibly and ignorantly;y refer to them, are no more "right" than 1980s democrats.Thanks for giving me your opinion. Nonetheless, your opinion is worthless because I am no communist. I was a Republican for 35 years and believe in many of the Republican ideals. I am not a fan of the Far Right (all extremes are bad) and I am not a fan of assumptions or speculation. Give me data, statistics and facts. Otherwise,
View attachment 999423
That's a serious overdose of straw right there.
I’m a white, male, 60+ years old… I have no chance of getting another job capable of supporting my family if I were to lose the one I have.
1980 Democrats, eh?The "far right" as you so glibly and ignorantly;y refer to them, are no more "right" than 1980s democrats.
Your "statics and data" are leftist partisan hack GIGO.
So YOU....
![]()
No it’s a reflection on the anti-male, anti-white, ageist business culture we liive in today. I can see it in the company I work for currently. The “diversity” candidate pretty much always gets the job, regardless of qualifications.That's a reflection on you, not the job market.
You most likely were not a Republican. Once elected many politicians forget who voted them in. America First has shown us who the sell outs are in the Progressive and Republican parties. They are either compromised or are globalists. We are moving more and more into a surveillance and tracking society. Next year if you have no Real ID, you will not be able to fly unless you have a passport. We need IDs for everything except voting. The situation is so nasty, that Trump is running as a populist. Not a right-wing conservative. Which we have not seen anything close to since Reagan. And Reagan was not as far right wing as promoted. We were fronted endless RINOS/NEO CONS since Reagan, and we fell for it.Thanks for giving me your opinion. Nonetheless, your opinion is worthless because I am no communist. I was a Republican for 35 years and believe in many of the Republican ideals. I am not a fan of the Far Right (all extremes are bad) and I am not a fan of assumptions or speculation. Give me data, statistics and facts. Otherwise,
View attachment 999423
Nice post hoc fallacy you have there.This is also something that is true and that has been confirmed 100%
No it’s a reflection on the anti-male, anti-white, ageist business culture we liive in today. I can see it in the company I work for currently. The “diversity” candidate pretty much always gets the job, regardless of qualifications.
You communicate with cartoons?
Sure, you must be right, given how convinced you are.You most likely were not a Republican. Once elected many politicians forget who voted them in. America First has shown us who the sell outs are in the Progressive and Republican parties. They are either compromised or are globalists. We are moving more and more into a surveillance and tracking society. Next year if you have no Real ID, you will not be able to fly unless you have a passport. We need IDs for everything except voting. The situation is so nasty, that Trump is running as a populist. Not a right-wing conservative. Which we have not seen anything close to since Reagan. And Reagan was not as far right wing as promoted. We were fronted endless RINOS/NEO CONS since Reagan, and we fell for it.