You are unemployed and want a new job, under a Democratic president you have a better chance of getting one!

[Stryder50]

No, it is not. What a strange world you live in.

It was the world of the working class~middle class.
Not the welfare class you are in.

 

[protectionist]

LOL You're blaming Dems for high rents? The Dems are the first ones that advocate for rent-controls and lowering rent prices, while right-wing Republicans fight tooth and nail to stop rent control and lowering rents. You're all for subsidizing the rich:

Rank	Parent	Subsidy Value	Number of Awards
1	Boeing	$15,496,865,703	958
2	Intel	$8,421,707,656	135
3	Ford Motor	$7,742,056,086	703
4	General Motors	$7,524,714,800	792
5	Micron Technology	$6,790,131,915	21
6	Amazon.com	$5,823,705,434	460
7	Alcoa	$5,727,691,764	134
8	Cheniere Energy	$5,617,152,523	43
9	Foxconn Technology Group (Hon Hai Precision Industry Company)	$4,820,110,112	74
10	Venture Global LNG	$4,338,702,441	8
11	Texas Instruments	$4,286,328,869	69
12	Volkswagen	$3,977,630,513	217
13	Sempra Energy	$3,828,022,782	51
14	NRG Energy	$3,415,751,518	266
15	NextEra Energy	$3,008,691,129	116
16	Sasol	$2,836,049,845	72
17	Tesla Inc.	$2,829,855,494	114
18	Stellantis	$2,795,436,436	213
19	Walt Disney	$2,543,219,673	265
20	Nucor	$2,538,761,123	176
21	Iberdrola	$2,380,558,984	110
22	Rivian Automotive Inc.	$2,364,054,012	7
23	Hyundai Motor	$2,349,743,470	18
24	Oracle	$2,272,418,288	96
25	Shell PLC	$2,211,676,001	132
26	Mubadala Investment Company	$2,124,035,097	62
27	Nike	$2,104,917,829	153
28	Meta Platforms Inc.	$2,098,261,272	82
29	Toyota	$2,071,010,689	239
30	Alphabet Inc.	$2,054,325,527	125
31	Brookfield Corporation	$1,979,408,388	288
32	Paramount Global	$1,974,249,897	342
33	Comcast	$1,927,402,844	405
34	Exxon Mobil	$1,917,119,478	241
35	Samsung Electronics	$1,891,136,597	41
36	Apple Inc.	$1,845,004,670	63
37	Nissan	$1,842,814,165	98
38	Berkshire Hathaway	$1,830,986,253	1,200
39	Summit Power	$1,783,593,414	6
40	JPMorgan Chase	$1,740,972,699	1,151
41	Energy Transfer	$1,736,836,843	175
42	Cleveland-Cliffs	$1,705,497,604	129
43	Southern Company	$1,694,958,172	45
44	General Electric	$1,645,135,367	958
45	Vornado Realty Trust	$1,623,857,336	33
46	Duke Energy	$1,580,421,869	86
47	Wolfspeed Inc.	$1,563,595,610	64
48	General Atomics	$1,510,875,891	112
49	IBM Corp.	$1,497,901,697	368
50	Lockheed Martin	$1,462,674,082	325
51	OGE Energy	$1,427,570,182	15
52	SCS Energy	$1,419,011,796	5
53	Corning Inc.	$1,391,603,359	401
54	Panasonic	$1,384,147,584	61
55	Microsoft	$1,366,243,159	113
56	Sagamore Development	$1,320,000,000	2
57	Northrop Grumman	$1,284,014,883	285
58	Vingroup	$1,254,000,000	1
59	Continental AG	$1,244,875,478	111
60	RTX Corporation	$1,193,950,954	797
61	CF Industries	$1,134,394,215	131
62	Valero Energy	$1,053,812,692	207
63	Dow Inc.	$1,049,354,213	640
64	AES Corp.	$1,039,510,135	136
65	Air Products & Chemicals	$1,025,557,482	88
66	Exelon	$986,892,877	98
67	Pyramid Companies	$973,565,278	93
68	SK Holdings	$960,550,283	8
69	SkyWest	$944,296,654	339
70	Centene	$916,607,054	60
71	Mazda Toyota Manufacturing, U.S.A., Inc.	$900,000,000	1
72	Apollo Global Management	$897,750,089	594
73	Delta Air Lines	$871,485,833	13
74	Jefferies Financial Group	$871,137,335	16
75	SK Hynix	$866,700,000	2
76	Bayer	$852,475,226	217
77	Honda	$849,832,301	93
78	Shin-Etsu Chemical	$828,683,936	106
79	Enterprise Products Partners	$826,988,371	89
80	SunEdison	$817,425,725	115
81	Goldman Sachs	$800,873,386	253
82	Bank of America	$798,426,128	956
83	E.ON	$786,865,473	40
84	Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.	$786,835,708	219
85	EDF-Electricite de France	$774,590,441	36
86	Triple Five Worldwide	$748,000,000	4
87	EDP-Energias de Portugal	$733,674,868	14
88	Related Companies	$714,675,504	8
89	Koch Industries	$683,066,388	510
90	Caithness Energy	$672,688,888	30
91	Dell Technologies	$658,417,951	185
92	Wells Fargo	$657,333,216	542
93	FedEx	$647,035,546	633
94	Entergy	$638,533,387	235
95	OCI N.V.	$627,879,406	5
96	Eli Lilly	$623,326,368	79
97	Chevron Phillips Chemical	$619,839,444	20
98	Bedrock Detroit	$618,000,000	1
99	Dominion Energy	$615,436,089	79

Download results as CSV or XML or Save your search

And you constantly flip the finger to the working class. You're for socialism for the wealthy and "FU" for the working class, "pick yourself up by your own bootstraps bucko, you fukn bum, get to work, stop complaining...". You're for a "fiscal responsible economic policy", when the government is serving the needs of the American working class, asking questions like "whose going to pay for it?"..."we're running out of money, OMG! We're going broke! OMG!"...But when it comes to subsidizing the wealthiest people in our society, not one peep from you. You remain quiet.

View attachment 999683

View attachment 999685​

Spend trillions bailing out the rich, subsidizing them, with public funds, and you never ask "whose going to pay for it", only when the government spends money, on the working class, do you start whining. You hypocrites.

​

Well that was a marvelous rant imitation impersonation of ME, during my 40 years as a far left Democrat (1969-2009). Ho hum. All the words I used to say, before I grew up.

Here's a few things you might be interested to know >>

• Trump cut taxes more for the lower income groups than for the rich - 3 & 4 % than the rich top bracket > 2.6%
• after 3.5 years of Biden's presidency, we have seen no change in taxation on the rich. Still a relatively low 37%.
• Previous Republican presidents had MUCH higher tax rates on the rich.
• Federal income tax rates and brackets | Internal Revenue Service
• Blue states with bans on rent control, include these states that Biden won in 2020 >> Washington, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Virginia, Georgia, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut,
• Blue states without a ban, but they also DON'T HAVE rent control >> Nevada, Nebraska, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, New York, Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island, Hawaii.
• So out of 27 blue states, 22 either don't have rent control statewide, or have a ban on it (13 of them).
• In 2016, Hillary Clinton got more $$$ from Wall St fat cats than Trump & Sanders.

 

[Stryder50]

This is a chart you need to see

View attachment 999720

You are making one BIG mistake. The Democrats are not looking to be a socialist country. They believe in Democratic Socialism, such as Norway has. In addition, no one is trying to get rid of Capitalism. All that is being done is to have some controls and restrictions, so that it is not "unfettered" as the chart shows.

This is what our forefathers wanted when they made the Constitution. They wanted compromise between the parties so no extremes were able to be reached. Uncontrolled Socialism (Communism) is as bad and Uncontrolled Capitalism. Both have to be restricted and controlled so the good comes out and is used and the bad of each is not given a chance to come out.

Do you understand????? It is the center of politics. Not the Far Right or the Far Left.

You are comparing a grape to a watermelon. metaphor.
Norway has a population less than most states.
It is a more homogeneous population than in the USA.
It also has an exception dose of natural resources for it's size and population;
....
Norwegians enjoy the second-highest GDP per capita among European countries (after Luxembourg), and the sixth-highest GDP (PPP) per capita in the world. Norway ranks as the second-wealthiest country in monetary value, with the largest capital reserve per capita of any nation.[153] According to the CIA World Factbook, Norway is a net external creditor of debt.
....
The country is richly endowed with natural resources including petroleum, hydropower, fish, forests, and minerals. Large reserves of petroleum and natural gas were discovered in the 1960s, which led to an economic boom.[citation needed] Norway has obtained one of the highest standards of living in the world in part by having a large amount of natural resources compared to the size of the population.[citation needed] In 2011, 28% of state revenues were generated from the petroleum industry.
...

Norway - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Socialism is socialism.
Putting lipstick on it doesn't change or improve it.
No such thing as uncontrolled socialism, since socialism is all about control.

 

[protectionist]

Well that was a marvelous rant imitation impersonation of ME, during my 40 years as a far left Democrat (1969-2009). Ho hum. All the words I used to say, before I grew up.

Here's a few things you might be interested to know >>

• Trump cut taxes more for the lower income groups than for the rich - 3 & 4 % than the rich top bracket > 2.6%
• after 3.5 years of Biden's presidency, we have seen no change in taxation on the rich. Still a relatively low 37%.
• Previous Republican presidents had MUCH higher tax rates on the rich.
• Federal income tax rates and brackets | Internal Revenue Service
• Blue states with bans on rent control, include these states that Biden won in 2020 >> Washington, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Virginia, Georgia, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut,
• Blue states without a ban, but they also DON'T HAVE rent control >> Nevada, Nebraska, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, New York, Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island, Hawaii.
• So out of 27 blue states, 22 either don't have rent control statewide, or have a ban on it (13 of them).
• So much for Democrats advocating for rent control, and what did the Bidens do while rents skyrocketed faster and higher than anyone has ever seen ?
• In 2016, Hillary Clinton got more $$$ from Wall St fat cats than Trump & Sanders.

 

[TruthNotBS]

Well that was a marvelous rant imitation impersonation of ME, during my 40 years as a far left Democrat (1969-2009). Ho hum. All the words I used to say, before I grew up.

Here's a few things you might be interested to know >>

• Trump cut taxes more for the lower income groups than for the rich - 3 & 4 % than the rich top bracket > 2.6%
• after 3.5 years of Biden's presidency, we have seen no change in taxation on the rich. Still a relatively low 37%.
• Previous Republican presidents had MUCH higher tax rates on the rich.
• Federal income tax rates and brackets | Internal Revenue Service
• Blue states with bans on rent control, include these states that Biden won in 2020 >> Washington, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Virginia, Georgia, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut,
• Blue states without a ban, but they also DON'T HAVE rent control >> Nevada, Nebraska, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, New York, Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island, Hawaii.
• So out of 27 blue states, 22 either don't have rent control statewide, or have a ban on it (13 of them).
• In 2016, Hillary Clinton got more $$$ from Wall St fat cats than Trump & Sanders.

Protectionist, your attempt to dismiss my arguments with a condescending tone doesn’t change the fact that your claims are riddled with inaccuracies and half-truths. Let’s address them point by point.

1. Trump's Tax Cuts:

You claim that Trump cut taxes more for the lower income groups than for the rich. While it’s true that Trump's tax cuts included reductions for all income brackets, the reality is that the wealthiest Americans received a much larger absolute benefit from these cuts. The top 1% saw their after-tax income increase significantly more than any other group. Additionally, the corporate tax rate was slashed from 35% to 21%, overwhelmingly benefiting the wealthy and large corporations. These tax cuts also contributed to ballooning the deficit, which Republicans conveniently ignore when they benefit the rich but use as a pretext to cut social programs that help the working class.

Despite the tax cuts under the Trump administration, other expenses for the working class have increased, effectively negating any benefits that the tax cuts might have provided. Here are some key points to consider:

1. Healthcare Costs:
   
   • Under the Trump administration, there were efforts to undermine the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which led to uncertainty and rising healthcare costs for many Americans. Premiums for health insurance, prescription drug prices, and out-of-pocket healthcare expenses continued to rise, putting a strain on working-class families despite the tax cuts.
2. Housing Costs:
   
   • The cost of housing has continued to rise, particularly in urban areas. Rent and home prices have increased significantly, outpacing wage growth. The tax cuts did nothing to address the housing affordability crisis, and in some cases, the reduction in federal revenue contributed to cuts in programs that could have helped alleviate these issues.
3. Education Costs:
   
   • College tuition and student loan debt have continued to skyrocket, placing an increasing burden on working-class families. The Trump administration rolled back some consumer protections for student borrowers, which further exacerbated the financial challenges related to education.
4. State and Local Taxes:
   
   • The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 capped the state and local tax (SALT) deduction at $10,000, disproportionately affecting middle-class taxpayers in states with higher taxes. This cap increased the effective tax burden for many working- and middle-class households in those states.
5. Public Services and Infrastructure:
   
   • The federal tax cuts led to reduced revenue for the government, which in turn resulted in budget cuts at the state and local levels. This has affected public services like education, transportation, and infrastructure, leading to higher costs for the working class, who often rely on these services.
6. Inflation and Cost of Living:
   
   • While the Trump tax cuts provided a short-term boost in take-home pay for some, the longer-term effects included increased deficits and national debt, which can contribute to inflationary pressures. As a result, the cost of living has continued to rise, particularly for essential goods and services, effectively diminishing the purchasing power of the tax cuts.

2. Biden and Taxation:

Your claim that there has been "no change in taxation on the rich" under Biden is misleading. The Biden administration has proposed several tax increases on the wealthiest Americans and corporations, including raising the corporate tax rate and increasing the top marginal tax rate for high earners. The challenge, however, lies in the Senate, where Republican obstruction and a few conservative Democrats have stalled these proposals. The fact remains that Biden's administration is working to increase taxes on the wealthy to fund essential social programs and infrastructure investments that benefit everyone, not just the rich.

3. Rent Control in Blue States:

You cherry-pick examples of blue states with bans on rent control or without statewide rent control laws, but this doesn’t tell the whole story. Many blue states and cities have strong tenant protections and rent control measures in place, especially in areas with significant housing affordability issues. For example, New York City and San Francisco have well-established rent control policies. Furthermore, Democrats at the federal level have consistently advocated for increased affordable housing and rental assistance programs. Republicans, on the other hand, have largely opposed these measures, favoring market-based solutions that have proven ineffective in addressing the housing crisis.

Republicans complaining about Dem rent control policies:

Democrats are more likely to be pro-rent control than Republicans. To pretend otherwise is disingenuous at best.
​

4. Wall Street Donations:

Yes, Hillary Clinton received significant donations from Wall Street during her campaign, which is a point of criticism from progressives and socialists alike. However, this doesn’t change the fact that Democratic policies generally favor stronger regulations on financial institutions, protections for consumers, and support for working families. In contrast, Republicans have consistently pushed for deregulation, which led to the 2008 financial crisis, and continue to advocate for policies that benefit the wealthy elite at the expense of the working class.

5. Comparing Red and Blue States:

Comparing red and blue states on rent control is a disingenuous tactic. The reality is that rent control and tenant protection policies are typically stronger in blue states and cities, where Democrats have more control. The absence of statewide rent control in some blue states doesn’t negate the fact that Democratic lawmakers and city governments in these states are actively working to address housing affordability through various means, including rent control, affordable housing initiatives, and rental assistance programs.

On the other hand, Republican-controlled states and cities often reject these measures, leading to higher rents and fewer protections for tenants.

Protectionist, your arguments rely on selective data and misleading claims. The truth is that Democratic policies are far more aligned with protecting the working class, advocating for affordable housing, and regulating the excesses of the wealthy and powerful. Republicans, including Trump, have consistently prioritized tax cuts for the rich, deregulation, and policies that exacerbate income inequality and housing insecurity. Your attempt to paint the Democratic Party as hypocritical while ignoring the blatant pro-wealthy policies of the Republican Party doesn’t hold up under scrutiny.

 

[HeyNorm]

Sigh, another blind-by-choice that refuses data, statistics and facts and that his response is to blame others and insult.

One more Trump minion, unable to think for himself

Science.

 

[TruthNotBS]

You are comparing a grape to a watermelon. metaphor.
Norway has a population less than most states.
It is a more homogeneous population than in the USA.
It also has an exception dose of natural resources for it's size and population;
....
Norwegians enjoy the second-highest GDP per capita among European countries (after Luxembourg), and the sixth-highest GDP (PPP) per capita in the world. Norway ranks as the second-wealthiest country in monetary value, with the largest capital reserve per capita of any nation.[153] According to the CIA World Factbook, Norway is a net external creditor of debt.
....
The country is richly endowed with natural resources including petroleum, hydropower, fish, forests, and minerals. Large reserves of petroleum and natural gas were discovered in the 1960s, which led to an economic boom.[citation needed] Norway has obtained one of the highest standards of living in the world in part by having a large amount of natural resources compared to the size of the population.[citation needed] In 2011, 28% of state revenues were generated from the petroleum industry.
...

Norway - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Socialism is socialism.
Putting lipstick on it doesn't change or improve it.
No such thing as uncontrolled socialism, since socialism is all about control.

Capitalism is all about control over workers and public resources. So your views couldn't be more warped. Norway is the way it is partly yes to its natural wealth, however, also due to its social democratic values and policies. It's a socialistic society, that has a mixed economy. Some capitalism with some socialism. What anti-socialist polemicists like you refuse to recognize is that socialism and communism, come in different forms, despite your objections to that fact.

The countries that consistently rank highest in terms of standard of living, satisfaction, and happiness are those that have mixed economies—combining elements of market capitalism with strong social welfare systems. These nations provide their citizens with a robust social safety net, which includes comprehensive healthcare, education, unemployment benefits, and pensions, among other social services.

Examples include:

1. Scandinavian Countries (Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Iceland):
   
   • These countries are often cited as examples of successful mixed economies. They combine a free-market capitalist system with extensive social welfare programs, including universal healthcare, free or heavily subsidized education, generous parental leave, and strong labor protections. As a result, they consistently rank high on the World Happiness Report and have some of the highest standards of living in the world.
2. Germany:
   
   • Germany has a strong social market economy, which blends free-market capitalism with a comprehensive social safety net. The country provides universal healthcare, free higher education, and robust unemployment benefits. Germany's economy is also characterized by strong labor unions and cooperative relationships between employers and employees, which contribute to high levels of worker satisfaction.
3. Canada:
   
   • Canada combines a market-based economy with a wide range of social services, including universal healthcare, social security, and various forms of social assistance. Canadians benefit from a strong public education system and programs that help reduce poverty and inequality. Canada consistently ranks high in global quality of life indexes.
4. Netherlands:
   
   • The Netherlands has a mixed economy with a strong welfare state. The country provides universal healthcare, excellent public education, and substantial social benefits, including unemployment and disability insurance. The Dutch system promotes a high standard of living and ranks high on happiness and well-being measures.
5. Switzerland:
   
   • Switzerland has a mixed economy with a strong focus on social insurance and public services. While it has a highly developed free-market economy, the country also provides extensive healthcare coverage, a well-functioning pension system, and various social protections. Switzerland frequently ranks high in terms of quality of life and happiness.

These countries demonstrate that a balanced approach, combining a well-regulated market capitalism with the equity and security provided by socialism, can lead to a prosperous, satisfied, and happy populace. The key is to ensure that economic growth and wealth are distributed in a way that benefits society as a whole, rather than just a select few. This model contrasts sharply with more laissez-faire capitalist systems, like we have here in the US, where the lack of a strong social safety net, has led to higher levels of inequality, poverty, and social dissatisfaction.

Now don't tell me to go to these other countries, NO. I'm an American and I have just as much a right to advance my political ideology and social values, as you do. So spare me the nasty stupid comments against democratic socialists like me, demanding that we leave our country and go live somewhere else. No, I live here, this is my country just as much as it is yours, and I'm a democratic council-socialist. If anyone should leave, why not you? You leave, I stay.

 

[Luckyone]

You are comparing a grape to a watermelon. metaphor.
Norway has a population less than most states.
It is a more homogeneous population than in the USA.
It also has an exception dose of natural resources for it's size and population;
....
Norwegians enjoy the second-highest GDP per capita among European countries (after Luxembourg), and the sixth-highest GDP (PPP) per capita in the world. Norway ranks as the second-wealthiest country in monetary value, with the largest capital reserve per capita of any nation.[153] According to the CIA World Factbook, Norway is a net external creditor of debt.
....
The country is richly endowed with natural resources including petroleum, hydropower, fish, forests, and minerals. Large reserves of petroleum and natural gas were discovered in the 1960s, which led to an economic boom.[citation needed] Norway has obtained one of the highest standards of living in the world in part by having a large amount of natural resources compared to the size of the population.[citation needed] In 2011, 28% of state revenues were generated from the petroleum industry.
...

Norway - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Socialism is socialism.
Putting lipstick on it doesn't change or improve it.
No such thing as uncontrolled socialism, since socialism is all about control.

Bottom line is their approach to the type of governing that is best for the people, Are you saying that because of their resources, they have that type of approach. That is hilarious.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Bottom line is their approach to the type of governing that is best for the people, Are you saying that because of their resources, they have that type of approach. That is hilarious.

Move there.

 

[Luckyone]

Move there.

Thanks for the sarcastic response but I am American and I love my country and what I am doing is fighting for it. Trying to stop people that will hurt it (Trump and his minions)

I put my life at risk for my country and I will die trying to defend it. Showing you (and all the others that don't have a brain) how things could be better, is my intention.

This meme shows where I am at

 

[SeaMajor7]

Thanks for the sarcastic response but I am American and I love my country and what I am doing is fighting for it. Trying to stop people that will hurt it (Trump and his minions)

I put my life at risk for my country and I will die trying to defend it. Showing you (and all the others that don't have a brain) how things could be better, is my intention.

This meme shows where I am at

View attachment 999926

You vote with the Marxist LEFT.
You are a threat to this country.
No sarcasm.
GTFOH

 

[Luckyone]

You vote with the Marxist LEFT.
You are a threat to this country.
No sarcasm.
GTFOH

Marxist left, eh?

Well, being nice to you (not attacking you as you are attacking me without knowing who I am and what I believe in), you need to prove that Marxism is what the left is promoting. I do not see it that way.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Marxist left, eh?

Well, being nice to you (not attacking you as you are attacking me without knowing who I am and what I believe in), you need to prove that Marxism is what the left is promoting. I do not see it that way.

Yuri Bezmenov warned us......
There's your clue.

 

[Luckyone]

Yuri Bezmenov warned us......
There's your clue.

If you cannot debate, don't address my posts. I won't talk to those that can't present their views in a way where they actually make their point.

This response of yours is ridiculous and plain stupid. Yuri Bezmency warned us? Does that mean that you are the kind of a person that heeds what others say, without having proof that what they say is true?

Then again, perhaps that is who you are

 

[GMCGeneral]

If you cannot debate, don't address my posts. I won't talk to those that can't present their views in a way where they actually make their point.

This response of yours is ridiculous and plain stupid. Yuri Bezmency warned us? Does that mean that you are the kind of a person that heeds what others say, without having proof that what they say is true?

Then again, perhaps that is who you are

View attachment 999937

He is right. You are a far Left Communist and an enemy of the country. If you enlisted, then you are a disgrace to the uniform. You want Norway or some other socialist shithole, move there

 

[SeaMajor7]

If you cannot debate, don't address my posts. I won't talk to those that can't present their views in a way where they actually make their point.

This response of yours is ridiculous and plain stupid. Yuri Bezmency warned us? Does that mean that you are the kind of a person that heeds what others say, without having proof that what they say is true?

Then again, perhaps that is who you are

View attachment 999937

The Marxists have been infiltrating our edu, media, and governance for the last ONE HUNDRED YEARS. If you CHOOSE to not believe that FACT, that's on YOU.
Look up Yuri Bezmenov, he'll explain it clearly to you from way back in 1985.
We are at the threshold and it's fucking OBVIOUS.
The demented LEFT have embraced Marxism and want to FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE this country, just like Obama told us.
It's not even debatable at this point.

 

[Luckyone]

He is right. You are a far Left Communist and an enemy of the country. If you enlisted, then you are a disgrace to the uniform. You want Norway or some other socialist shithole, move there

You are entitled to your opinion, as misinformed as it is

 

[Luckyone]

The Marxists have been infiltrating our edu, media, and governance for the last ONE HUNDRED YEARS. If you CHOOSE to not believe that FACT, that's on YOU.
Look up Yuri Bezmenov, he'll explain it clearly to you from way back in 1985.
We are at the threshold and it's fucking OBVIOUS.
The demented LEFT have embraced Marxism and want to FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE this country, just like Obama told us.
It's not even debatable at this point.

You deliver pure biased BS. You are blind-by-choice and given that you believe what you want to believe (not open to facts, data, and statistics), you are not worth dedicating any more of my time on you. I do not visit fantasy worlds and debate with those living there.

 

[SeaMajor7]

You deliver pure biased BS. You are blind-by-choice and given that you believe what you want to believe (not open to facts, data, and statistics), you are not worth dedicating any more of my time on you. I do not visit fantasy worlds and debate with those living there.

View attachment 999940

IRONY

 

[22lcidw]

Thanks for the sarcastic response but I am American and I love my country and what I am doing is fighting for it. Trying to stop people that will hurt it (Trump and his minions)

I put my life at risk for my country and I will die trying to defend it. Showing you (and all the others that don't have a brain) how things could be better, is my intention.

This meme shows where I am at

View attachment 999926

That picture to the right does not have the reality with it. Many of the people have drugs, alcohol, children out of wedlock, prison records, many abortions, not very good at work, lower educations, and anything related. If they surpass this and make amends, then you are right. And tell the rich Progressives to give up their wealth. To accept illegals and poorer people into their living areas. There are many. None have done that. Marthas Vinyard and the expulsion of illegals is an example what Prog truly are. Talkers. Not walkers except to promote discord among people.