You all complain when we compare Trump to Hitler in any way, what happens when Trump does it?

Ah, yes. Again, he does something inconvenient for you, you just pass it off as "trolling".

I'm wondering what he'd have to do to make you people worry.

Go to war after getting you all cheering that he's the peace president and he wouldn't go to war. Nope

Telling everyone that he won the war, and then giving in to all the demands of the country he supposed defeated months later. Nope.

It's not us he's trolling. It's the MAGA crowd.
You uneducated idiot's believe the comparisons. Both of my Grandfathers fought against real fascist during WWII. If alive today is would be a toss up between laughing their asses off or slapping the shit out of you people.
 
You uneducated idiot's believe the comparisons. Both of my Grandfathers fought against real fascist during WWII. If alive today is would be a toss up between laughing their asses off or slapping the shit out of you people.
Depends what the comparison is.

I've never said Trump is exactly the same as Hitler. I doubt anyone has.

Take a look at the "Truth" Social post in the OP.

When I've compared Trump to Hitler, I've looked at how both were/are populists, how both lied, how both pointed to groups of people and blamed them for the problems that exist. How their supporters cheered when they took action against those they perceived as causing those problems.

A valid comparison.

But you people, you "uneducated idiots" (not "uneducated idiot's", always fun when an idiot who doesn't know basic grammar attacks people for being uneducated, but anyway) can't understand what a comparison is.

For you it's all or nothing. You want to defend Trump no matter what. Any connection with Hitler needs to be shot down immediately.

And of course there are people "laughing their asses off", people will laugh at others who know the truth, and you believe something that isn't true. It's something we deal with on a daily basis and ignore because it's like little child laughing at an adult about shit they have no idea what they're talking about.
 
" Equitable Doctrine And Representation By Proxy Through Empathy For Suffering "

* Transcendental Mobility Currently Unavailable Given Maturity *

You are the sick "people" who condone sex change experimentation on children.
Hell, even Mengele did not think of that.
In fact I'd say you one-uped the Nazis.
There are significant differences between children , adolescents and adults for legally entering into a social civil agreements , as social civil agreements are made valid through informed consent , where developmental ages are correlated with rites and privileges .

Us republic is founded upon principles of individualism , through equal protection of negative liberties among individuals , which is limited for valid protections of safety or of security , where an individual would be a citizen , an immigrant , a corporation , or collection of individuals such as a us state , or us federate , or a civil litigant .

A compelling perspective would be that in the interest for independence of the individual and competence for informed consent for safety and security , both direct and existential , is that for non adults , states have a legitimate interest in limiting cosmetic surgery to correcting significant disfigurements , whether with or without parental consent .

In roe v wade decision , second trimester abortions could be regulated to ensure safety of the procedures .

* Contending Against Cruelties Of Natural Existence *

It is rather difficult to one up those intentionally exposing prisoners to the elements with a purpose of inducing hypothermia , so as to test methods for resuscitating them , to save kindred soldiers , while mostly failing .
 
Depends what the comparison is.

I've never said Trump is exactly the same as Hitler. I doubt anyone has.

Take a look at the "Truth" Social post in the OP.

When I've compared Trump to Hitler, I've looked at how both were/are populists, how both lied, how both pointed to groups of people and blamed them for the problems that exist. How their supporters cheered when they took action against those they perceived as causing those problems.

A valid comparison.

But you people, you "uneducated idiots" (not "uneducated idiot's", always fun when an idiot who doesn't know basic grammar attacks people for being uneducated, but anyway) can't understand what a comparison is.

For you it's all or nothing. You want to defend Trump no matter what. Any connection with Hitler needs to be shot down immediately.

And of course there are people "laughing their asses off", people will laugh at others who know the truth, and you believe something that isn't true. It's something we deal with on a daily basis and ignore because it's like little child laughing at an adult about shit they have no idea what they're talking about.
Bernie Sanders, AOC, and a slew of other politicians are socialist, using your reasoning they are like Mao and Stalin.

I'm not defending Trump I pointing out ignorant comparisons
 
Bernie Sanders, AOC, and a slew of other politicians are socialist, using your reasoning they are like Mao and Stalin.

I'm not defending Trump I pointing out ignorant comparisons

If you can find valid comparisons with them and Mao and Stalin, then go ahead and make them.

The problem is, many of the MAGA people couldn't tell you much about Mao and Stalin to actually make such a comparison. They'd be as you just said "They're socialist and Mao and Stalin were socialist, so they're the same".

Not "Well, Mao had this policy and AOC supports that same policy too, and here's the reason why."

It'd take doing research and MAGA can't even spell "research".
 
You are the sick "people" who condone sex change experimentation on children.

Hell, even Mengele did not think of that.

In fact I'd say you one-uped the Nazis.

You guys were so outraged that we would compare Trump to Hitler or Putin or Bush but that's exactly who he's trying to be. Not Gandi, MLK or Churchill.

In an interview with reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan, Trump showed a document written by a business associate (and former caddie) that ranked him above past figures like Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan, Napoleon, Stalin, Mao, and Hitler. The core arguments of the text included:

  • Trump is the "most powerful person that has ever walked this planet".
  • Past figures maintained power through fear and conquest too but lacked global reach.
  • Trump has superior control over modern manpower, logistics, and global economic muscle, making his global reach historically unprecedented
While Trump and his supporters used these comparisons to boast about his immense global influence and strength, political opponents and historians have repeatedly expressed alarm. Critics point out that his self-comparison to such leaders fuels debates about authoritarianism, noting his frequent use of political rhetoric often compared to historical dictators.


For a look at the historical comparisons and the debates surrounding Trump's language and rhetoric:



The enemy within? Calling liberals Vermin? The language he's using is purposely authoritarian. Stalin, Mao, all used language like Trump uses.
 
There are parts of the book that deal with trump comparing himself favorably with Stalin and Hitler from the perspective of the power trump wields. Morality never enters the equation.

 
There are parts of the book that deal with trump comparing himself favorably with Stalin and Hitler from the perspective of the power trump wields. Morality never enters the equation.


Just keep sucking up the exhaust emitted from the Propanda Machine.
Your TDS is overwhelming. And pathetic.
 
Back
Top Bottom