bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,328
- 2,180
The courts support a policy that expands their power?And the courts. And normal adults. Only desperate cultists make shit up as you are.
I am so shocked!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The courts support a policy that expands their power?And the courts. And normal adults. Only desperate cultists make shit up as you are.
Naturally, since you are a big fan of executive power and authoritarianism.The courts support a policy that expands their power?
I am so shocked!
No banana, turd. Why would they need a warrant to log phone numbers of calls to the victims house? Does it say the victim protested the use of the pen register? I seriously doubt itThis is the big one: Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979)
Maybe you don't understand...because you don't understand. Maybe it's not the rest of the world that is crazy, and you are just ignorant.No banana, turd. Why would they need a warrant to log phone numbers of calls to the victims house? Does it say the victim protested the use of the pen register? I seriously doubt it
In other words, you can't come up with a logical reason for the victim to object to the use of the pen register.Maybe you don't understand...because you don't understand. Maybe it's not the rest of the world that is crazy, and you are just ignorant.
If there is one thing I am not, it's a fan of executive authority.Naturally, since you are a big fan of executive power and authoritarianism.
Yes, unfortunately for McCarthy the lying weasel, no laws would be broken. That's why he wont name one.
You used the right word. Everything is about Distraction now, Factual info has been losing the battle.They're not. It's already been alluded to and Gym Jordan himself has said he was in contact with Trump several times that day, wanting him to deploy the National Guard..(riiiighhtttt.....).
What they are scared of is a public relations nightmare. Standing members of Congress aiding and abetting an insurrection, probably calling Trump to coordinate and tell him to keep up the good fight.
The worst would be if they found that any Republican member actually gave directions for the protesters that would have threatened the lives of Democrats in the building..or worse, the Vice President
and his family.
They have a huge distraction in Afghanistan that isn't going to last as long as they think it will. This would stop that momentum in its tracks.
If there is one thing I am not, it's a fan of executive authority.Naturally, since you are a big fan of executive power and authoritarianism.
Yes, unfortunately for McCarthy the lying weasel, no laws would be broken. That's why he wont name one.
You can? Okay, go to court and lose like the others, then. Why are you just sitting there?In other words, you can't come up with a logical reason for the victim to object to the use of the pen register.
Well okay then. Then i would think you would appreciate congressional oversight.If there is one thing I am not, it's a fan of executive authority.
McCarthy is not the official authority on the Constitution.
No I can't, but unlike you I'm not trying. You're the one claiming there is, not me.You can? Okay, go to court and lose like the others, then. Why are you just sitting there?
What the hell does congressional oversight have to do with this subject?Well okay then. Then i would think you would appreciate congressional oversight.
I dont k ow what you imagine i am trying. They can subpoena those phone records. It is what it is.No I can't, but unlike you I'm not trying. You're the one claiming there is, not me.
I can only imagine the depth of denial required to play act such a goofy position.What the hell does congressional oversight have to do with this subject?
You're the one who claimed it was OK for Congress to subpoena private records. So far you haven't provided any evidence to support that contention.I dont k ow what you imagine i am trying. They can subpoena those phone records. It is what it is.
You don't have to imagine a thing. You're the one who is denying the facts.I can only imagine the depth of denial required to play act such a goofy position.
And it is. And they have. More than once. Not sure which reality you woke up in this morning... join us in this one. Even the trump SCOTUS just ruled they could have trump's tax returns. You are running out of lies and distractions.You're the one who claimed it was OK for Congress to subpoena private records.
So far you haven't proved it. When has Congress ever subpoenaed private records?And it is. And they have. More than once. Not sure which reality you woke up in this morning... join us in this one.
To you. That's right. I never try to prove anything to you. Waste of time.So far you haven't proved it.
Remember earlier this year, when Adam Schiff apparently obtained phone records of some people? And they squawked that he got some sort of "private warrant?So far you haven't proved it. When has Congress ever subpoenaed private records?