frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 54,959
- 15,097
- 2,180
The matter of definitions. Ukronazism type I can be more or less called "nazionalism" in the western meaning of the word (while it, among other things, promote inferiority of Slavic people comparing with German people). Ukronazism type II is more of "fascism" - "people should be changed because the government said so". And Ukronazism type III ("Mongols and Finno-Hungarians are subhumans and should be killed") is more or less western Neo-Nazism.
As I said, it depends. If you good to Russia, Russia is good to you.
Washington (and American people) may recognise formal independence of Texas, but there is no way that American people may allow discrimination and open genocide of English-speaking Texans (including demonstrative human sacrifices in the worst Indian and Spanish inquisition traditions) or American decision-makers can allow Chinese medium-range missiles there after joining Texas to Shanghai block.
And how many people in the Ukraine are "Nazis"?
And how many people in Russia are "Nazis"?
And how many people, on average, in other countries, are "Nazis"?
