Yet Some Claim Ukraine isn’t Held Enthrall By Nazis

November 27, 2013. Ukrainians really want to kill Russians (The crowd shouts, "Hang the russians!", "Whoever doesn't jump is russian!", "One country, one nation, one language!"). This is even before Crimea's return to Russia.
Donbas and Crimea left when these guys seized power. They couldn't stand being treated like that.

You know, most duels, that is, armed conflicts, were rarely motivated by money. Mostly, they were motivated by insults. This gives a rough idea of the attitude of the residents of Crimea and Donbas toward the coup in Kyiv.

Here's another example: neo-nazis came to power in New York City by armed reviolt and declared the swastika the city's official coat of arms and Adolf Hitler an honorary citizen. I think that alone would have been enough to set Brooklyn ablaze...

 
A person reposted my YouTube video titled “Mariupol. After Hell.”
The person is being charged with the fact that the video “contains disapproving statements by the residents of Mariupol regarding the Ukrainian authorities of President Zelensky, which led to the destruction and deaths of the residents of Mariupol during the armed aggression.”

The sentence for this person is five years (!!!) in prison with confiscation.This is modern Ukraine. This is reality
 
The photo shows a Finnish concentration camp in Petrozavodsk (1944). The caption at the top is in Finnish. The same photo (with the caption cropped) appears in a fake Ukrainian textbook for 10th grade (2018) with the caption, "Child prisoners of the Gulag. Late 1930s."

The entire history of Ukraine is built on a lie.
G8VhAvhboAAhaXG


G8VhA2XacAAUU8z
 
Hitler knew the value of a good lie to fool stupid people. It still works!

AI Overview

Adolf Hitler was not a socialist; Nazism is historically classified as a far-right, fascist ideology. Hitler and the Nazi party were vehemently anti-socialist and anti-communist, actively persecuting and imprisoning members of leftist parties and trade unionists once they gained power.
The misconception that Hitler was a socialist stems primarily from two sources:

  • The name of his party: The official name was the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP).
  • Early party rhetoric: The party's initial 25-point program included some populist, anti-capitalist ideas to attract working-class voters away from Marxist parties.
However, the "socialist" aspects in the name and early platform were a "cynical trick of language and propaganda" rather than a genuine ideological commitment.
Key differences between Nazism and socialism include:

  • Private Property: Traditional socialism advocates for the public or community ownership of the means of production. The Nazis, however, preserved the capitalist economy and private property, collaborating with major industrialists who saw them as a bulwark against communism.
  • Class Struggle vs. Race: Socialism focuses on class struggle and equality among workers regardless of race. Nazism was centered on a hierarchical, race-based ideology (the "Aryan" master race) and ultra-nationalism, which sought to unite all "pure" Germans while persecuting those deemed "inferior" or "alien".
  • Political Persecution: Socialists and communists were among the first victims sent to concentration camps after Hitler seized power in 1933. The "left-wing" members within the Nazi party itself, such as Gregor Strasser and Ernst Röhm, were purged and executed during the Night of the Long Knives in 1934.
  • Dictatorship: Nazism established a one-party, totalitarian dictatorship under the Führer, fundamentally opposed to the democratic and internationalist aims of most socialist movements.
When the robot is smarter than its owner.

G_fz5sbXYAEcOcW
 
Elon has jumped the shark.
 
"Ukraine is the first country in the world that failed to complete the construction of a nazi state, because the money for its construction was stolen by jews." (c) Julius Caesar
 
On Ukrainian channel 24, host Fakhruddin Sharafmal first quotes SS Obersturmbannführer Adolf Eichmann, who said that the children of enemies must be destroyed because that is how their lineage will be ended.
He then expresses regret that the armed forces are not allowed to kill children, as this is prohibited by the Geneva Convention. Finally, he recalls that he is not a member of the armed forces and therefore can kill anyone he wants.

Of course, this is not nazism, it is something else.
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom