YAY! STEVE BANNON INDICTED by federal grand jury!!!

[Nostra]

Weli...if he did not plan the riot and he did not know about the attack on the Capitol...he should have not problem testifying to the Select Committee. I think we would all like to know what he meant when he said "all Hell is gonna break loose."

But he sure is throwing a wrench in the assumption that he did not know about the attempted insurrection, as he stonewalls the investigation. Like trump said many, many times "What is he hiding?"

BackAgain: You are a hopeless trump humping MAGA liar.....how do you sleep at night?

Funny shit. Someone doesn't want to participate in Nazi Pelousy's sham hearings, and that proves he is guilty of insurrection.

You are an idiot.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Wrong. It’s not.

Sorry. It is. Stop embarrassing yourself.

 

[JimH52]

Bannon is a useful substitute club for Trump
It’s deranged
It’s TDS.

How do you know that there isn't an investigation to find out what trump's involvement in the January 6th attack on the Capitol already taking place. My Gosh! He and Bannon are butt buddies....Bannon knew what was going to happen....trump knew what was going to happen. The records will show they communicated numerous times. That is why they are desperately trying to keep the records secret.

The repub party is SCUM for allowing a tin Mafia Boss like trump to drag them around by the nose.

 

[Nostra]

How do you know that there isn't an investigation to find out what trump's involvement in the January 6th attack on the Capitol already taking place. My Gosh! He and Bannon are butt buddies....Bannon knew what was going to happen....trump knew what was going to happen. The records will show they communicated numerous times. That is why they are desperately trying to keep the records secret.

The repub party is SCUM for allowing a tin Mafia Boss like trump to drag them around by the nose.

Seems to me all you have for evidence is mind reading.

Not sure that's gonna stand up in court, Skippy.

 

[Batcat]

Oops, you're confused again. People babbling isn't evidence.

You have none. Zero. Nobody has any. You are a liar being used by liars.

Your wonderful liberal Washington Post just retracted a lot of the lies it has been telling gullible people like you.

And you claim I have no evidence of the liberal media lying to us. The truth is you are unable to admit you were misled and your ego will prevent you from ever admitting that fact.

Washington Post makes major retraction, correction on years-old stories related to Steele dossier | Blaze Media

The Washington Post revealed Friday the newspaper had removed and corrected "large portions" of years-old stories about the infamous Christopher Steele dossier, which the mainstream media used as alleged evidence to claim Donald Trump's presidential campaign colluded with Russia.What is the...

www.theblaze.com

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/media-washington-post-steele-dossier/2021/11/12/f7c9b770-43d5-11ec-a88e-2aa4632af69b_story.html

 

[BackAgain]

Weli...if he did not plan the riot and he did not know about the attack on the Capitol...he should have not problem testifying to the Select Committee. I think we would all like to know what he meant when he said "all Hell is gonna break loose."

But he sure is throwing a wrench in the assumption that he did not know about the attempted insurrection, as he stonewalls the investigation. Like trump said many, many times "What is he hiding?"

BackAgain: You are a hopeless trump humping MAGA liar.....how do you sleep at night?

You remain an utter hack and you are perpetually stalled in the unpersuasive lane.

Our discussion has had nothing at all to do with whether Bannon should have chosen to testify.

Like one of your fellow idiot liberal troll colleagues, you are also somehow imagining that my dispute with your mindless monkey-chittering banalities concerning Bannon somehow means this a Trump discussion. You are just a simpleton TDS SUFFERER.

Must be painful.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yes, exactly like Holder. He ignored a lawful subpoena and was held in contempt of Congress.

After having already testified multiple times, dope.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Let's see the videos.

GO!

I don’t know how you do it so easily but you continue to just make yourself a bigger moron with each post.

 

[Nostra]

After having already testified multiple times, dope.

So? It is a fact he ignored a subpoena and was held in contempt.

What he did previously doesn't matter, Dumbass.

 

[Nostra]

I don’t know how you do it so easily but you continue to just make yourself a bigger moron with each post.

So you have no videos.

Dismissed.

 

[BackAgain]

Sorry. It is. Stop embarrassing yourself.

Don’t worry. you’re the one being embarrassed skippy.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So? It is a fact he ignored a subpoena and was held in contempt.

What he did previously doesn't matter, Dumbass.

Of course it does. There is no context in which they could ever be the same.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So you have no videos.

Dismissed.

Nearly a year out and you’re still asking for other grown men to educate you. Do you ever feel shame?

 

[Nostra]

Nearly a year out and you’re still asking for other grown men to educate you. Do you ever feel shame?

Still no videos......

Cameras all over the place, supposedly 140 cops beaten up, and you can't produce a single video.

Odd.

 

[Nostra]

Of course it does. There is no context in which they could ever be the same.

So, if someone doesn't kill someone in the past he can kill someone and just say "I didn't commit that crime in the past so I'm didn't do it this time".

 

[Lastamender]

Are you ever not a dumbfuck?

Do you ever stop believing liars?

 

[cnm]

Some people claim that accepting a pardon is somehow an admission of guilt. It isn’t. But I can understand how it looks that way.

according to a Supreme Court majority opinion in Burdick v. United States a pardon "carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance a confession of it". ​

Federal pardons in the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

​

​

How to Read a U.S. Supreme Court Opinion​

When more than half of the justices agree, the Court issues a majority opinion. Other times, there is no majority, but a plurality, so the Court issues a plurality opinion. Typically, one justice is identified as the author of the main opinion.​

 

[JimH52]

You remain an utter hack and you are perpetually stalled in the unpersuasive lane.

Our discussion has had nothing at all to do with whether Bannon should have chosen to testify.

Like one of your fellow idiot liberal troll colleagues, you are also somehow imagining that my dispute with your mindless monkey-chittering banalities concerning Bannon somehow means this a Trump discussion. You are just a simpleton TDS SUFFERER.

Must be painful.

It is beyond belief that a fellow American is cheering for a man that wants to "bring it all down."

You are a treasonous SOB.

 

[JimH52]

Do you ever stop believing liars?

Wait....did a trump bumper use the word liars....with a straight face? The Serial Liar who had now been pushing the Big Lie for over a year?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Do you ever stop believing liars?

Was Bannon lying when he said that?