Canada's Fruit Machine

Polishprince

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Messages
51,989
Reaction score
43,633
Points
3,615
The Dominion of Canada invented this highly technological device determined to discern LGBTQ+ people from normative folks.

Is it time to bring this technology to America, so the Homoamericans can be detected at an early age and hormone therapy be enacted to delay puberty?

I'm sure libs would think so, as it would give a scientific twist to their obsession with early 'supportive" care of trans minors.

 
The Dominion of Canada invented this highly technological device determined to discern LGBTQ+ people from normative folks.

Is it time to bring this technology to America, so the Homoamericans can be detected at an early age and hormone therapy be enacted to delay puberty?

I'm sure libs would think so, as it would give a scientific twist to their obsession with early 'supportive" care of trans minors.

The Right should love this too since children, once identified, can be made to feel abnormal and discriminated against as soon as possible.
 
The Right should love this too since children, once identified, can be made to feel abnormal and discriminated against as soon as possible.
It seems that subjective morals may not be everything they were cracked up to be. You make a really good argument. Too bad you don't have a leg to stand on.
 
It seems that subjective morals may not be everything they were cracked up to be. You make a really good argument. Too bad you don't have a leg to stand on.
I have the same leg as everyone else, my vote.
 
Do you know what you are talking about?
Yes. Your inability to take the moral high ground because morals are subjective. But you made a really good argument if morals were objective that is.
 
Yes. Your inability to take the moral high ground because morals are subjective. But you made a really good argument if morals were objective that is.
High ground is a relative, not absolute term.
 
Correct. There is no absolute morality for humans but there are some moral standards that are common across different cultures.
Perfect. You probably shouldn't be making moral arguments then.
 
How's that working out for you?
Great, if one can ignore hypocrisy. What he is really saying is that morals aren't absolute unless they are his morals. I know this because every argument he makes is a moral argument that he expects others to agree with.
 
15th post
Great, if one can ignore hypocrisy. What he is really saying is that morals aren't absolute unless they are his morals. I know this because every argument he makes is a moral argument that he expects others to agree with.
Is that worse than you making moral arguments that everyone has to agree with?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom