Grand jury declines to indict the 6 congress-critters who reminded servicemen that they are not to follow illegal orders.

[Crepitus]

Ironclad case? Have you never heard the wise old saying "A prosecutor could indict a ham sandwich"?

Unlawful laws and unlawful orders need not be obeyed. Old news indeed.

Well, they failed to indict this ham sandwich. What does that say about their case?

 

[Mack The Finger]

"You're"

You're kidding me !

 

[ThisIsMe]

This would be unheard of in any other administration.

The DOJ only goes to the grand jury when they have an ironclad case.

Until now.

Grand jury declines criminal charges against 6 Democrats who urged military to reject illegal orders

A federal grand jury refused to indict six Democrats who drew President Trump's ire by taping a video telling members of the military that they must reject "illegal orders," three sources told CBS News.

www.cbsnews.com

I didn’t expect anything less. I’ve no fear though, I’m sure our service members are smart enough to know their duty and they already know what is and isn’t an illegal order. Abiding by the law isn’t an illegal order

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The rapist charity thief traitor who tried to steal our presidential election and peaceful transition of power isn't fit to carry Kelly's piss bag to the launch pad.

And everyone knows it, including his mindless cult sheep.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I didn’t expect anything less. I’ve no fear though, I’m sure our service members are smart enough to know their duty and they already know what is and isn’t an illegal order. Abiding by the law isn’t an illegal order

Not good enough, sadly.

As we saw when trump illegally deployed our military to our cities.

The soldiers need assurance and swifter action.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Not good enough, sadly.

As we saw when trump illegally deployed our military to our cities.

The soldiers need assurance and swifter action.

the president can use the NG to protect federal officers on US soil. It’s legal.

10 U.S. Code § 12406 - National Guard in Federal service: call

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

the president can use the NG to protect federal officers on US soil. It’s legal.

10 U.S. Code § 12406 - National Guard in Federal service: call

www.law.cornell.edu

Irrelevant, bad faith post. The usual.

His deployments were illegal, as noted at the time and as finally decided by our court system, way too long after the fact.

Not good enough.

 

[Mac-7]

What bad advice?

To disobey lawful orders

 

[PeterPilot]

Crepitus

A Grand Jury Nullification of Malicious Tyranny – The Future of Freedom Foundation

In what can be called an act of grand-jury nullification, a federal grand jury has rebuffed an effort by the U.S. Justice Department to seek criminal indictments of six members of Congress for having the audacity to remind American military personnel of their duty to refuse to obey unlawful...

www.fff.org

 

[Marener]

To disobey lawful orders

No wonder they couldn’t convince a grand jury.

You are claiming they said the exact opposite of what they actually said.

 

[JimH52]

This would be unheard of in any other administration.

The DOJ only goes to the grand jury when they have an ironclad case.

Until now.

Grand jury declines criminal charges against 6 Democrats who urged military to reject illegal orders

A federal grand jury refused to indict six Democrats who drew President Trump's ire by taping a video telling members of the military that they must reject "illegal orders," three sources told CBS News.

www.cbsnews.com

Just another stop on the Felon’s vengeance tour.

 

[JimH52]

They told them the exact same thing they are told when they sign up.

These people twist into pretzels in order to defend the Felon.

 

[Mac-7]

No wonder they couldn’t convince a grand jury.

You are claiming they said the exact opposite of what they actually said.

I never said they America-hating dems broke the law

What I am saying is that any service member who listens to them is almost sure to regret it

 

[ThisIsMe]

Irrelevant, bad faith post. The usual.

His deployments were illegal, as noted at the time and as finally decided by our court system, way too long after the fact.

Not good enough.

You just call everything you don’t like “bad faith” but don’t explain why you feel that way. This, it’s just words.

Trump using NG to protect federal agents is 100% legal, I posted the law that says so, what else do you need?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

To disobey lawful orders

See what I mean? You shamelessly lie the way others breathe. You didn't use to be this way.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You just call everything you don’t like “bad faith” but don’t explain why you feel that way.

Because I don't have to explain.

In this case you pretended not to know what I was talking about and sharted an irrelevant statement that you expected me to do work to explain and dismiss.

No interest in honest discussion. Only an onterest in taking discussion backwards.

But you knew all of that and compulsivley posted in bad faith again to pretend you did not.

You can't help yourself.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Because I don't have to explain.

Which is why I don’t know what you are talking about when you say it.

In this case you pretended not to know what I was talking about and sharted an irrelevant statement that you expected me to do work to dismiss.

No interest in honest discussion.

But you knew all of that and compulsivley posted in bad faith again to pretend you did not.

You can't help yourself.

I’m giving you straight answers as I see them. You seem to think I have some ulterior motive or that I’m trying to troll you, I’m not. I’m answering your questions as I understand them, as they appear to me by your words. If I misunderstand, then maybe I quite, instead of throwing your hands up in the air and saying “bad faith!” or “sea lion!”.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Which is why I don’t know what you are talking about when you say it.

Yes you do.

I've watched you repeat yourself and start over with other posters.

It's an old act.

But enough about that. I won't mention it again. I also won't play the game.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Yes you do.

I've watched you repeat yourself and start over with other posters.

It's an old act.

But enough about that. I won't mention it again. I also won't play the game.

I think you totally have me wrong lol, you accuse me of some sun tzu tactic that I am completely unaware of…

 

[JimH52]

Because I don't have to explain.

In this case you pretended not to know what I was talking about and sharted an irrelevant statement that you expected me to do work to explain and dismiss.

No interest in honest discussion. Only an onterest in taking discussion backwards.

But you knew all of that and compulsivley posted in bad faith again to pretend you did not.

You can't help yourself.

It’s the Felon’s disease. The inability to tell the truth.