Y chromosome article may answer some questions.

As so often the case, lack of precise wording and expression results in confusion and cross-channel communications.
....
Gender includes the social, psychological, cultural and behavioral aspects of being a man, woman, or other gender identity.[1][2] Depending on the context, this may include sex-based social structures (i.e. gender roles) and gender expression.[3][4][5] Most cultures use a gender binary, in which gender is divided into two categories, and people are considered part of one or the other (boys/men and girls/women);[6][7][8] those who are outside these groups may fall under the umbrella term non-binary. Some societies have specific genders besides "man" and "woman", such as the hijras of South Asia; these are often referred to as third genders (and fourth genders, etc.). Most scholars agree that gender is a central characteristic for social organization.[9]

In the mid-20th century, a terminological distinction in modern English (known as the sex and gender distinction) between biological sex and gender began to develop in the academic areas of psychology, sexology, and feminism.[10][11] Before the mid-20th century, it was uncommon to use the word gender to refer to anything but grammatical categories.[3][1] In the 1970s, feminist theory embraced the concept of a distinction between biological sex and the social construct of gender. The distinction between gender and sex is made by most contemporary social scientists in western countries,[12][13][14] behavioral scientists and biologists,[15] many legal systems and government bodies,[16] and intergovernmental agencies such as WHO.[17]

The social sciences have a branch devoted to gender studies. Other sciences, such as psychology, sociology, sexology and neuroscience, are interested in the subject. The social sciences sometimes approach gender as a social construct, and gender studies particularly do, while research in the natural sciences investigates whether biological differences in females and males influence the development of gender in humans; both inform the debate about how far biological differences influence the formation of gender identity and gendered behavior. Biopsychosocial approaches to gender include biological, psychological, and social/cultural aspects.[18][19]
...
Ya, “gender” has been taken over by liberal boneheads who believe they are smarter than the science.
 
I'm not confused and don't care what everyone else is doing like you.

Why is that?
To make science god you have to kill the magic. So, what your kind are doing is trying to kill the creation. Especially Adam and Eve. It’s not working. People are figuring this out.
 
To make science god you have to kill the magic. So, what your kind are doing is trying to kill the creation. Especially Adam and Eve. It’s not working. People are figuring this out.
Magic?

Like a virgin birth?
 
So, not the literal interpretation of the mythical bible then.

Okay, how did moses part the waters?
Natural processes that only God could do. To the faithful, it was God. To the non-believer faithless, it was magic. That’s why the Pharaoh and others with Moses didn’t recognize it as God doing it. They saw it as magic.
 
Natural processes that only God could do. To the faithful, it was God. To the non-believer faithless, it was magic. That’s why the Pharaoh and others with Moses didn’t recognize it as God doing it. They saw it as magic.
So, magic.

Like a bush burning without burning.

Or putting every animal on earth in an ark.

Or creating the water to flood the earth.
 
So, magic.

Like a bush burning without burning.

Or putting every animal on earth in an ark.

Or creating the water to flood the earth.
You are self and privately interpreting. The scriptures are not for private interpretation. Nothing was created to flood the earth. It was already above and below the earth. Every animal that God wanted preserved. The brightness of God like a fire is burning. Uggg…
 
You are self and privately interpreting. The scriptures are not for private interpretation. Nothing was created to flood the earth. It was already above and below the earth. Every animal that God wanted preserved. The brightness of God like a fire is burning. Uggg…
So, again not a literal interpretation of the bible, but excuses for its errors.

Which account in the bible do believe for people who went to jesus’ tomb after he “rose”? It gives three different stories.
 
So, again not a literal interpretation of the bible, but excuses for its errors.

Which account in the bible do believe for people who went to jesus’ tomb after he “rose”? It gives three different stories.
The only errors is between your unbelieving ears and sunken spirituality dark eyes.
Are you a literary infant? Three different people gave an account of what they witnessed and remembered that was important to them. Your excuses for your unbelief has no power over the believers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top