Thats comical coming from an Alex Jones groupie.
WTC building 7
- Thread starter eots
- Start date
KokomoJojo
VIP Member
- Oct 2, 2013
- 2,180
- 185
- 85
your first pic isnt the core
the second has a nice clean cut that you are hiding.
in fact its one of the all time favs for proving explosive demolition!
yer doing great! keep up the good work!
lol.. you do not give a shit what you post do you..did you even watch that 15 sec video ? it couldn't be anymore pointless...you should be fired.. you should at least be required to try to put up some kind of coherent counter argument
You poor, dear. Your cult of conspiracy theory loons has been made a laughing stock and you're angry.
what a dumb fucking thing to say, so you do not know the difference between a conspiracy and forensic evidence.
Sorry, I did not look at all 105 pages here.
And, I am an independent. I have no political entity and I'm not dependent on religions too.
I got this information years ago. It is possible that true or this is conspiracy theory? ( English language speaking in video)
Sure is, its 'way' beyond theory.
yep thats a good starter video. I am more into the physics end of it but they hit on the main points quite well.
KokomoJojo
VIP Member
- Oct 2, 2013
- 2,180
- 185
- 85
yeh several truthers are afflicted with trying to reason with and explain physics to tarded pantomime political posers
Actually, you twoofers have never gone past conspiracy theory. That's why you loons are still cutting and pasting the same goofy YouTube videos that you were cutting and pasting a decade ago.
So where are the 9/11 hijackers that you conspiracy theory loons claim are alive and well?
You're not in any way equipped to address the physics issues. Neither is your cult leader Alex Jones.
Capstone
Gold Member
- Feb 14, 2012
- 5,502
- 953
- 290
Hmm..."phony melodrama"; now that's a thinker. I can't decide whether it's more indicative of your subconscious mind tattling on you (and you don't actually believe what I wrote was truly melodramatic) or you were simply inept in your choice of phrasing there.
In any case, there's no melodrama underpinning my choices of words and phrases, such as "atrocities" and "draconian measures", because they perfectly fit the circumstances and events they were used to describe. I've never been one to call a spade anything other than a spade. In my view, "torture" will always mean torture, no matter how often western leaders have referred to it as "enhanced interrogation" in the post-9/11 era. If you'd like, I could post some death tolls, a buttload of gory images (some involving innocent civilians, including children), and a list of the publicly known legislative measures that have been written and implemented in the wake of 9/11/01, to support my "phony melodrama", but I don't feel that's necessary, not only because such things are common knowledge in this day and age, but because it seems to me that you already know (at least on some level) that my language has been entirely appropriate in those regards.
hollie said:
Let's get one thing straight right off the bat; I haven't made a contention of a "vast conspiracy" in this thread or anywhere else in the forums.
That you're unable (or perhaps unwilling) to fathom how the 9/11 false flag operation could have been planned, funded, and carried out in a carefully compartmentalized fashion, specifically to limit the number of individuals in-the-know, is a multifaceted failure of imagination and critical thinking on your part. This is especially true in light of the nature of the world in which you live, Hollie - a world where fewer than 1% of the population wields virtually all of the power and deep-seated influence over the sociopolitical circumstances that ultimately rule the events in the day-to-day lives of the unwashed masses, and in very large part, perched on positions of near complete anonymity.
As to what I've offered in this thread in terms of support for the contentions I have made WRT 9/11/01, Newton's Third Law of Motion is authoritative and clear enough on its own to unambiguously dispel the myths in the official explanation of Building 7's "collapse". No YouTube videos required. End of story.
Unfortunately, at least from the perspective of those who deployed the NIST group to fabricate a physically viable explanation for the inexplicable symmetry and speed of Building 7's demise, the "collapse" was caught on video from every angle. This is why they had to admit the 2.25 seconds of freefall in their revised, November 2008, edition of their final report. Equally unfortunate (for them), is the fact that their explanation doesn't fit their own observations and charting of that admission, which makes their report self-refuting. More plainly, since their fire-induced progressive collapse model cannot produce a remotely plausible scenario in which the physical conditions required to account for the observed symmetry and speed of the "collapse" could have arisen, it can and should be rejected as the transparent fraud it has always been. Q.E.D.
hollie said:
And you're free to continue propagating the officially authorized myths of long fallen dominoes and fully collapsed cardhouses.
As for me, I'm through with pissing in the wind at people like you, as you stand clueless amid the scattered blocks and playing cards, so have fun with that.
My, but you twoofers do like to sling off your cliches' and slogans. That long winded series of histrionics was reminiscent of most every Alex Jones diatribe.
Hmm..."phony melodrama"; now that's a thinker. I can't decide whether it's more indicative of your subconscious mind tattling on you (and you don't actually believe what I wrote was truly melodramatic) or you were simply inept in your choice of phrasing there.
In any case, there's no melodrama underpinning my choices of words and phrases, such as "atrocities" and "draconian measures", because they perfectly fit the circumstances and events they were used to describe. I've never been one to call a spade anything other than a spade. In my view, "torture" will always mean torture, no matter how often western leaders have referred to it as "enhanced interrogation" in the post-9/11 era. If you'd like, I could post some death tolls, a buttload of gory images (some involving innocent civilians, including children), and a list of the publicly known legislative measures that have been written and implemented in the wake of 9/11/01, to support my "phony melodrama", but I don't feel that's necessary, not only because such things are common knowledge in this day and age, but because it seems to me that you already know (at least on some level) that my language has been entirely appropriate in those regards.
hollie said:
Let's get one thing straight right off the bat; I haven't made a contention of a "vast conspiracy" in this thread or anywhere else in the forums.
That you're unable (or perhaps unwilling) to fathom how the 9/11 false flag operation could have been planned, funded, and carried out in a carefully compartmentalized fashion, specifically to limit the number of individuals in-the-know, is a multifaceted failure of imagination and critical thinking on your part. This is especially true in light of the nature of the world in which you live, Hollie - a world where fewer than 1% of the population wields virtually all of the power and deep-seated influence over the sociopolitical circumstances that ultimately rule the events in the day-to-day lives of the unwashed masses, and in very large part, perched on positions of near complete anonymity.
As to what I've offered in this thread in terms of support for the contentions I have made WRT 9/11/01, Newton's Third Law of Motion is authoritative and clear enough on its own to unambiguously dispel the myths in the official explanation of Building 7's "collapse". No YouTube videos required. End of story.
Unfortunately, at least from the perspective of those who deployed the NIST group to fabricate a physically viable explanation for the inexplicable symmetry and speed of Building 7's demise, the "collapse" was caught on video from every angle. This is why they had to admit the 2.25 seconds of freefall in their revised, November 2008, edition of their final report. Equally unfortunate (for them), is the fact that their explanation doesn't fit their own observations and charting of that admission, which makes their report self-refuting. More plainly, since their fire-induced progressive collapse model cannot produce a remotely plausible scenario in which the physical conditions required to account for the observed symmetry and speed of the "collapse" could have arisen, it can and should be rejected as the transparent fraud it has always been. Q.E.D.
hollie said:
And you're free to continue propagating the officially authorized myths of long fallen dominoes and fully collapsed cardhouses.
As for me, I'm through with pissing in the wind at people like you, as you stand clueless amid the scattered blocks and playing cards, so have fun with that.
What a shame that you conspiracy theorists haven't been able to offer anything meaningfull to your tired, discredited conspiracy theories in more than a decade.
LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 50,938
- 18,222
- 2,250
someone farted in here.^
LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 50,938
- 18,222
- 2,250
Hmm..."phony melodrama"; now that's a thinker. I can't decide whether it's more indicative of your subconscious mind tattling on you (and you don't actually believe what I wrote was truly melodramatic) or you were simply inept in your choice of phrasing there.
In any case, there's no melodrama underpinning my choices of words and phrases, such as "atrocities" and "draconian measures", because they perfectly fit the circumstances and events they were used to describe. I've never been one to call a spade anything other than a spade. In my view, "torture" will always mean torture, no matter how often western leaders have referred to it as "enhanced interrogation" in the post-9/11 era. If you'd like, I could post some death tolls, a buttload of gory images (some involving innocent civilians, including children), and a list of the publicly known legislative measures that have been written and implemented in the wake of 9/11/01, to support my "phony melodrama", but I don't feel that's necessary, not only because such things are common knowledge in this day and age, but because it seems to me that you already know (at least on some level) that my language has been entirely appropriate in those regards.
hollie said:
Let's get one thing straight right off the bat; I haven't made a contention of a "vast conspiracy" in this thread or anywhere else in the forums.
That you're unable (or perhaps unwilling) to fathom how the 9/11 false flag operation could have been planned, funded, and carried out in a carefully compartmentalized fashion, specifically to limit the number of individuals in-the-know, is a multifaceted failure of imagination and critical thinking on your part. This is especially true in light of the nature of the world in which you live, Hollie - a world where fewer than 1% of the population wields virtually all of the power and deep-seated influence over the sociopolitical circumstances that ultimately rule the events in the day-to-day lives of the unwashed masses, and in very large part, perched on positions of near complete anonymity.
As to what I've offered in this thread in terms of support for the contentions I have made WRT 9/11/01, Newton's Third Law of Motion is authoritative and clear enough on its own to unambiguously dispel the myths in the official explanation of Building 7's "collapse". No YouTube videos required. End of story.
Unfortunately, at least from the perspective of those who deployed the NIST group to fabricate a physically viable explanation for the inexplicable symmetry and speed of Building 7's demise, the "collapse" was caught on video from every angle. This is why they had to admit the 2.25 seconds of freefall in their revised, November 2008, edition of their final report. Equally unfortunate (for them), is the fact that their explanation doesn't fit their own observations and charting of that admission, which makes their report self-refuting. More plainly, since their fire-induced progressive collapse model cannot produce a remotely plausible scenario in which the physical conditions required to account for the observed symmetry and speed of the "collapse" could have arisen, it can and should be rejected as the transparent fraud it has always been. Q.E.D.
hollie said:
And you're free to continue propagating the officially authorized myths of long fallen dominoes and fully collapsed cardhouses.
As for me, I'm through with pissing in the wind at people like you, as you stand clueless amid the scattered blocks and playing cards, so have fun with that.
anything that shoots down agent hollie wants a crackers ramblings,he covers his ears and closes his eyes and wont read what you post,none of your links, or watch any videos you post either.
Shot down what? The 9/11 conspiracy theories you loons still hope to prop up are a decade old now and even more outrageously silly and irrelevant now than before.
Hmm..."phony melodrama"; now that's a thinker. I can't decide whether it's more indicative of your subconscious mind tattling on you (and you don't actually believe what I wrote was truly melodramatic) or you were simply inept in your choice of phrasing there.
In any case, there's no melodrama underpinning my choices of words and phrases, such as "atrocities" and "draconian measures", because they perfectly fit the circumstances and events they were used to describe. I've never been one to call a spade anything other than a spade. In my view, "torture" will always mean torture, no matter how often western leaders have referred to it as "enhanced interrogation" in the post-9/11 era. If you'd like, I could post some death tolls, a buttload of gory images (some involving innocent civilians, including children), and a list of the publicly known legislative measures that have been written and implemented in the wake of 9/11/01, to support my "phony melodrama", but I don't feel that's necessary, not only because such things are common knowledge in this day and age, but because it seems to me that you already know (at least on some level) that my language has been entirely appropriate in those regards.
hollie said:
Let's get one thing straight right off the bat; I haven't made a contention of a "vast conspiracy" in this thread or anywhere else in the forums.
That you're unable (or perhaps unwilling) to fathom how the 9/11 false flag operation could have been planned, funded, and carried out in a carefully compartmentalized fashion, specifically to limit the number of individuals in-the-know, is a multifaceted failure of imagination and critical thinking on your part. This is especially true in light of the nature of the world in which you live, Hollie - a world where fewer than 1% of the population wields virtually all of the power and deep-seated influence over the sociopolitical circumstances that ultimately rule the events in the day-to-day lives of the unwashed masses, and in very large part, perched on positions of near complete anonymity.
As to what I've offered in this thread in terms of support for the contentions I have made WRT 9/11/01, Newton's Third Law of Motion is authoritative and clear enough on its own to unambiguously dispel the myths in the official explanation of Building 7's "collapse". No YouTube videos required. End of story.
Unfortunately, at least from the perspective of those who deployed the NIST group to fabricate a physically viable explanation for the inexplicable symmetry and speed of Building 7's demise, the "collapse" was caught on video from every angle. This is why they had to admit the 2.25 seconds of freefall in their revised, November 2008, edition of their final report. Equally unfortunate (for them), is the fact that their explanation doesn't fit their own observations and charting of that admission, which makes their report self-refuting. More plainly, since their fire-induced progressive collapse model cannot produce a remotely plausible scenario in which the physical conditions required to account for the observed symmetry and speed of the "collapse" could have arisen, it can and should be rejected as the transparent fraud it has always been. Q.E.D.
hollie said:
And you're free to continue propagating the officially authorized myths of long fallen dominoes and fully collapsed cardhouses.
As for me, I'm through with pissing in the wind at people like you, as you stand clueless amid the scattered blocks and playing cards, so have fun with that.
anything that shoots down agent hollie wants a crackers ramblings,he covers his ears and closes his eyes and wont read what you post,none of your links, or watch any videos you post either.
You're the loon that reports seeing Elvis at Walmart, right?
LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 50,938
- 18,222
- 2,250
someone farted in here.^
That's the best way to rid the discussion of conspiracy theory loons - hold the loons accountable for their goofy conspiracy theories.someone farted in here.^
LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 50,938
- 18,222
- 2,250
someone farted in here.^
Carla_Danger
Platinum Member
someone farted in here.^
You've been smelling that fart for quite a while now. You must be enjoying it.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Some of the 30,000 98's surrendered by Germany in Norway after the surrender.- Started by the watcher
- Replies: 2
-
-
ICE Confirms 65,000 Deportations, Majority With Criminal Records- Started by Mack The Finger
- Replies: 11
-
Bondi claims 1/3 of all Americans would have died in last 100 days if not for Trump.- Started by BULLDOG
- Replies: 20
