Oooooo.
A biologist throwing in her two cents. Remind me the next time I need a structural analysis done or loads calculated. I'll call on a biologist.
WTC-7 Was A Controlled Demolition Inside Job
- Thread starter Terral
- Start date
Oooooo.
A biologist throwing in her two cents. Remind me the next time I need a structural analysis done or loads calculated. I'll call on a biologist.
eots
no fly list
Oooooo.
A biologist throwing in her two cents. Remind me the next time I need a structural analysis done or loads calculated. I'll call on a biologist.
it is one of the finest minds in the country with a clear ability to research and and a keen understanding of scientific procedure and echos the beliefs of many exceptional scientist and engineers...denier
Dec. 13, 2007: Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9/11 Investigation – Official Account of 9/11 "Impossible", "Hogwash", "Fatally Flawed"
PDF Version Article on OpEdNews
Summary: Seven senior Federal engineers and scientists call for a new 9/11 investigation and denounce the official account of 9/11 as: "impossible", "hogwash", "fatally flawed", "false", "does not match the available facts", and "politically driven".
These senior engineers and scientists served in the Federal government for decades. Their primary functions were the responsible application of technology and the pursuit of scientific truth. Their statements demonstrate that the desire for a new, thorough, and independent investigation of 9/11 is not a matter of partisan politics, nor the demand of irresponsible, deranged, or disloyal Americans. It is instead a matter of the utmost importance for America’s security and the future of the entire world. We must not now ignore their stunning condemnation of the official account of 9/11.OpEdNews - Article: Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9/11 Investigation
Last edited:
Oooooo.
A biologist throwing in her two cents. Remind me the next time I need a structural analysis done or loads calculated. I'll call on a biologist.
it is one of the finest minds in the country with a clear ability to research and and a keen understanding of scientific procedure and echos the beliefs of many exceptional scientist and engineers...denier
Dec. 13, 2007: Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9/11 Investigation Official Account of 9/11 "Impossible", "Hogwash", "Fatally Flawed"
PDF Version Article on OpEdNews
Summary: Seven senior Federal engineers and scientists call for a new 9/11 investigation and denounce the official account of 9/11 as: "impossible", "hogwash", "fatally flawed", "false", "does not match the available facts", and "politically driven".
These senior engineers and scientists served in the Federal government for decades. Their primary functions were the responsible application of technology and the pursuit of scientific truth. Their statements demonstrate that the desire for a new, thorough, and independent investigation of 9/11 is not a matter of partisan politics, nor the demand of irresponsible, deranged, or disloyal Americans. It is instead a matter of the utmost importance for Americas security and the future of the entire world. We must not now ignore their stunning condemnation of the official account of 9/11.OpEdNews - Article: Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9/11 Investigation
It sounds like she researched it. She read the book and stopped there.
Much like what you do and your fellow truthers do.
eots
no fly list
Oooooo.
A biologist throwing in her two cents. Remind me the next time I need a structural analysis done or loads calculated. I'll call on a biologist.
it is one of the finest minds in the country with a clear ability to research and and a keen understanding of scientific procedure and echos the beliefs of many exceptional scientist and engineers...denier
Dec. 13, 2007: Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9/11 Investigation Official Account of 9/11 "Impossible", "Hogwash", "Fatally Flawed"
PDF Version Article on OpEdNews
Summary: Seven senior Federal engineers and scientists call for a new 9/11 investigation and denounce the official account of 9/11 as: "impossible", "hogwash", "fatally flawed", "false", "does not match the available facts", and "politically driven".
These senior engineers and scientists served in the Federal government for decades. Their primary functions were the responsible application of technology and the pursuit of scientific truth. Their statements demonstrate that the desire for a new, thorough, and independent investigation of 9/11 is not a matter of partisan politics, nor the demand of irresponsible, deranged, or disloyal Americans. It is instead a matter of the utmost importance for Americas security and the future of the entire world. We must not now ignore their stunning condemnation of the official account of 9/11.OpEdNews - Article: Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9/11 Investigation
It sounds like she researched it. She read the book and stopped there.
Much like what you do and your fellow truthers do.
right ...people of this esteem in science and engineering are well known for their un-thought out and non-analytical responses to questions of such extreme importance and contreversy....lol...unlike gavin from popular mechanics...lol
- Banned
- #887
you mean it isnt?xÞx;1652111 said:
the CT forum is for laughs
isn't it?
I thought this was the Routers RSS Feed?
No wonder everyone keeps looking at me funny when i bring up current events
eots
no fly list
Summary: Seven senior Federal engineers and scientists call for a new 9/11 investigation and denounce the official account of 9/11 as: "impossible", "hogwash", "fatally flawed", "false", "does not match the available facts", and "politically driven".
These senior engineers and scientists served in the Federal government for decades. Their primary functions were the responsible application of technology and the pursuit of scientific truth. Their statements demonstrate that the desire for a new, thorough, and independent investigation of 9/11 is not a matter of partisan politics, nor the demand of irresponsible, deranged, or disloyal Americans. It is instead a matter of the utmost importance for America’s security and the future of the entire world. We must not now ignore their stunning condemnation of the official account of 9/11.OpEdNews - Article: Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9/11 Investigation
One of America’s most prominent scientists, Dr. Margulis is Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts - Amherst. She was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1983 and served as Chairman of the Academy’s Space Science Board Committee on Planetary Biology and Chemical Evolution. In 1999, President Bill Clinton presented Dr. Margulis with the National Medal of Science, America's highest honor for scientific achievement, "for her outstanding contributions to understanding of the development, structure, and evolution of living things, for inspiring new research in the biological, climatological, geological and planetary sciences, and for her extraordinary abilities as a teacher and communicator of science to the public."
In her statement on PatriotsQuestion911.com, Dr. Margulis referred to 9/11 as “this new false-flag operation, which has been used to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as unprecedented assaults on research, education, and civil liberties”. She compared 9/11 to several self-inflicted attacks that had been used in the past to arouse people’s fear and hatred and justify war, including the sinking of the USS Maine in Havana Harbor, the Reichstag Fire, and Operation Himmler, which Germany used to justify the invasion of Poland, the trigger for World War II.
In her statement on PatriotsQuestion911.com, Dr. Margulis referred to 9/11 as “this new false-flag operation, which has been used to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as unprecedented assaults on research, education, and civil liberties”. She compared 9/11 to several self-inflicted attacks that had been used in the past to arouse people’s fear and hatred and justify war, including the sinking of the USS Maine in Havana Harbor, the Reichstag Fire, and Operation Himmler, which Germany used to justify the invasion of Poland, the trigger for World War II.
In her statement, Dr. Margulis cites “the research and clear writing by David Ray Griffin in his fabulous books about 9/11” as a useful source of information and analysis of problems with the official account of 9/11. She specifically lauded The New Pearl Harbor and The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, “which provides overwhelming evidence that the official story is contradictory, incomplete, and unbelievable.”Internationally acclaimed for her ground-breaking scientific work, Dr. Margulis is an elected member of The World Academy of Art and Science, an organization of 500 of the world’s leading thinkers, chosen for eminence in art, the natural and social sciences, and the humanities. And in 2006, she was selected as one of “The 20th Century's 100 Most Important Inspirational Leaders” by the editors of Resurgence magazine.
Dr. Margulis’ full statement can be read at PatriotsQuestion911.com. More information about Dr. Margulis’ career can be found at Sciencewriters.
OpEdNews - Article: National Academy of Sciences Member Calls for New 9/11 Investigation
ya but ditz con says you all is just funny and that yer morons..so checkmate bitch yuk yuk
These senior engineers and scientists served in the Federal government for decades. Their primary functions were the responsible application of technology and the pursuit of scientific truth. Their statements demonstrate that the desire for a new, thorough, and independent investigation of 9/11 is not a matter of partisan politics, nor the demand of irresponsible, deranged, or disloyal Americans. It is instead a matter of the utmost importance for America’s security and the future of the entire world. We must not now ignore their stunning condemnation of the official account of 9/11.OpEdNews - Article: Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9/11 Investigation
One of America’s most prominent scientists, Dr. Margulis is Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts - Amherst. She was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1983 and served as Chairman of the Academy’s Space Science Board Committee on Planetary Biology and Chemical Evolution. In 1999, President Bill Clinton presented Dr. Margulis with the National Medal of Science, America's highest honor for scientific achievement, "for her outstanding contributions to understanding of the development, structure, and evolution of living things, for inspiring new research in the biological, climatological, geological and planetary sciences, and for her extraordinary abilities as a teacher and communicator of science to the public."
In her statement on PatriotsQuestion911.com, Dr. Margulis referred to 9/11 as “this new false-flag operation, which has been used to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as unprecedented assaults on research, education, and civil liberties”. She compared 9/11 to several self-inflicted attacks that had been used in the past to arouse people’s fear and hatred and justify war, including the sinking of the USS Maine in Havana Harbor, the Reichstag Fire, and Operation Himmler, which Germany used to justify the invasion of Poland, the trigger for World War II.
In her statement on PatriotsQuestion911.com, Dr. Margulis referred to 9/11 as “this new false-flag operation, which has been used to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as unprecedented assaults on research, education, and civil liberties”. She compared 9/11 to several self-inflicted attacks that had been used in the past to arouse people’s fear and hatred and justify war, including the sinking of the USS Maine in Havana Harbor, the Reichstag Fire, and Operation Himmler, which Germany used to justify the invasion of Poland, the trigger for World War II.
In her statement, Dr. Margulis cites “the research and clear writing by David Ray Griffin in his fabulous books about 9/11” as a useful source of information and analysis of problems with the official account of 9/11. She specifically lauded The New Pearl Harbor and The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, “which provides overwhelming evidence that the official story is contradictory, incomplete, and unbelievable.”Internationally acclaimed for her ground-breaking scientific work, Dr. Margulis is an elected member of The World Academy of Art and Science, an organization of 500 of the world’s leading thinkers, chosen for eminence in art, the natural and social sciences, and the humanities. And in 2006, she was selected as one of “The 20th Century's 100 Most Important Inspirational Leaders” by the editors of Resurgence magazine.
Dr. Margulis’ full statement can be read at PatriotsQuestion911.com. More information about Dr. Margulis’ career can be found at Sciencewriters.
OpEdNews - Article: National Academy of Sciences Member Calls for New 9/11 Investigation
ya but ditz con says you all is just funny and that yer morons..so checkmate bitch yuk yuk
Last edited:
SFC Ollie
Still Marching
Dr. Margulis is Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts - Amherst. She was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1983 and served as Chairman of the Academys Space Science Board Committee on Planetary Biology and Chemical Evolution. In 1999, President Bill Clinton presented Dr. Margulis with the National Medal of Science, America's highest honor for scientific achievement, "for her outstanding contributions to understanding of the development, structure, and evolution of living things, for inspiring new research in the biological, climatological, geological and planetary sciences, and for her extraordinary abilities as a teacher and communicator of science to the public."
So this means she knows exactly what about explosives or Buildings or Structural
engineering?
Nada, Nix, Nothing......DUH
So this means she knows exactly what about explosives or Buildings or Structural
engineering?
Nada, Nix, Nothing......DUH
eots
no fly list
well duh it means she has a brilliant mind and a keen understanding of scientific procedure and research and the fact is her conclusions are echoed be many engineers 8 of them listed above
Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter. U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). Former Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. 22-year Air Force career. Also taught Mathematics and English at the University of Southern California, the University of Maryland, and Phillips University.
Member: Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth Association Statement:
"Scholars and professionals with various kinds of expertise---including architects, engineers, firefighters, intelligence officers, lawyers, medical professionals, military officers, philosophers, religious leaders, physical scientists, and pilots---have spoken out about radical discrepancies between the official account of the 9/11 attacks and what they, as independent researchers, have learned.
They have established beyond any reasonable doubt that the official account of 9/11 is false and that, therefore, the official investigations have really been cover-up operations.
Thus far, however, there has been no response from political leaders in Washington or, for that matter, in other capitals around the world. Our organization, Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth, has been formed to help bring about such a response.
We believe that the truth about 9/11 needs to be exposed now---not in 50 years as a footnote in the history books---so the policies that have been based on the Bush-Cheney administrations interpretation of the 9/11 attacks can be changed.
We are, therefore, calling for a new, independent investigation of 9/11 that takes account of evidence that has been documented by independent researchers but thus far ignored by governments and the mainstream media."
Video 9/11/04: "A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. Its impossible. Theres a second group of facts having to do with the cover up. Taken together these things prove that high levels of our government dont want us to know what happened and whos responsible.
Who gained from 9/11? Who covered up crucial information about 9/11? And who put out the patently false stories about 9/11 in the first place? When you take those three things together, I think the case is pretty clear that its highly placed individuals in the administration with all roads passing through Dick Cheney.
I think the very kindest thing that we can say about George W. Bush and all the people in the U.S. Government that have been involved in this massive cover-up, the very kindest thing we can say is that they were aware of impending attacks and let them happen. Now some people will say thats much too kind, however even that is high treason and conspiracy to commit murder." http://video.go
Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers to question. As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:
An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article
Dwain Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Before this appointment, he served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden. Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award and the Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988). Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics, a distinguished speaking engagement sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) (1986). Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000. Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology. 37 year NASA career.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:
"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Center]." AE911Truth
Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 900 Architects and Engineers:
"On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe that there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore that the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that may have been the actual cause behind the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC Building 7." Sign the Petition
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report
SFC Ollie
Still Marching
And for every person with any kind of credentials you can name that is a truther I'll bet I can find 5 who are not. It's all a matter of intelligence One of the truthers showed me a poll that actually stated:
"people with only a high school education and Democrats were especially likely to suspect federal involvement in 9/11."
LOL you gotta love you guys.
"people with only a high school education and Democrats were especially likely to suspect federal involvement in 9/11."
LOL you gotta love you guys.
eots
no fly list
well I bet you cant and would simply post popular mechanics in one form or another
again, there is nothing WRONG with using PM, because they got it right
not like the assholes you keep copy & pasting all over the place
eots
no fly list
priceless...lol
it was 4 fucking years ago they published that
and they got the basics right
there might be some minutia they got wrong, but thats it
you asswipes point out the minutia and scream "SEEE!!!!!!!!!!"
Hey eots? Is this what your posting has become? You can't debate the facts presented here so you just post other people's garbage?
Let's try again. If steel isn't affected by fire and cannot cause any type of collapse whatsoever, then what caused the collapse of the steel structure in the Windsor building pictured below?
Hey Terral.
Got a question for you. Why did you lie in this post at this forum here. The YBBS - View Single Post - 9/11 Was Definitely An Inside Job
Here is your post.
Can you explain why you used THAT picture to try and get people to believe that it was a picture of WTC7 as it fell at free fall speed, but had no broken windows from damage, thus being evidence AGAINST fires causing damage?
Why did you lie and use that picture above when it clearly shows the PENTHOUSE ON THE LEFT has not COLLAPSED INTO THE BUILDING yet? Telling us that the collapse has not yet even started, yet you tried to pass it off as a photo of WTC7 DURING collapse?
What a despicable liar you are?
Got a question for you. Why did you lie in this post at this forum here. The YBBS - View Single Post - 9/11 Was Definitely An Inside Job
Here is your post.
Terral said:1. The pictures of WTC-7 falling at almost freefall speed . . .
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors...wtc/WTC_ch5.htm
. . . do not even show evidence of fire in the unbroken windows. Remember our massive columns and beams are located very near these windows and require 2,800 degrees to begin melting.
Can you explain why you used THAT picture to try and get people to believe that it was a picture of WTC7 as it fell at free fall speed, but had no broken windows from damage, thus being evidence AGAINST fires causing damage?
Why did you lie and use that picture above when it clearly shows the PENTHOUSE ON THE LEFT has not COLLAPSED INTO THE BUILDING yet? Telling us that the collapse has not yet even started, yet you tried to pass it off as a photo of WTC7 DURING collapse?
What a despicable liar you are?
Hey Terral.
Why all the changes in your past stories? Here's an excerpt from this site. Christian-Forum.net - Discuss Bible prophecy, news, doctrine. Make friends
Then you change to say this here.
Now, after I posted the real video that INCLUDES the penthouse collapse, you say this.
A matter of hours, 6.6 seconds, mere seconds....
Keep changing the story Terral. Sooner or later you'll get it right.
Why all the changes in your past stories? Here's an excerpt from this site. Christian-Forum.net - Discuss Bible prophecy, news, doctrine. Make friends
Terral said:
. . . in just a matter of hours.
Then you change to say this here.
Remember that a gigantic skyscraper like this . . .
. . . was transformed into a neat little pile like this . . .
. . . in 6.6 seconds.
Now, after I posted the real video that INCLUDES the penthouse collapse, you say this.
reduced to this little pile . . .
. . . in mere seconds.
A matter of hours, 6.6 seconds, mere seconds....
Keep changing the story Terral. Sooner or later you'll get it right.
WTC-7 is already imploding at free fall speed, but there is 'no' sign of any building fires through any of the unbroken windows! And yet, this same skyscraper was reduced to this little pile . . .
Wow. I just noticed that you carry the same lie over here to this forum. Trying to pass off a picture showing "no damage" and claiming that photo shows WTC7 "already imploding at free fall speed" when the PENTHOUSE hasn't even collapsed yet in that photo.
The lengths you guys go to...
Nothing wrong with a few little lies, eh Terral?
Terral
Terral Corp CEO
- Mar 4, 2009
- 2,493
- 92
- 83
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #900
Hi Gam:
WTC-7 Was Definitely Taken Down Using Controlled Demolition (my OP). Period. The time from the WTC-1 and WTC-2 Demolition Implosions to the WTC-7 Demolition Implosion, later that afternoon, was 'hours.' However, the Controlled Demolition of WTC-7 from the 'start' of the implosion to the 'collapse' was exactly "6.6 seconds" (story and story and story). My choice of terms and phrases are understood through the 'context' of each statement.
Gam
confused is trying to cast the shadow of doubt upon my person (#3), because of the folly of his "Building Fires Did It" explanations. :0)
GL,
Terral
WTC-7 Was Definitely Taken Down Using Controlled Demolition (my OP). Period. The time from the WTC-1 and WTC-2 Demolition Implosions to the WTC-7 Demolition Implosion, later that afternoon, was 'hours.' However, the Controlled Demolition of WTC-7 from the 'start' of the implosion to the 'collapse' was exactly "6.6 seconds" (story and story and story). My choice of terms and phrases are understood through the 'context' of each statement.
Gam
confused is trying to cast the shadow of doubt upon my person (#3), because of the folly of his "Building Fires Did It" explanations. :0)GL,
Terral
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
IT’S NAPTIME IN AMERICA: TWO Democrat Congresswomen Fall Sound Asleep During the Same Committee Hearing!- Started by Doc7505
- Replies: 1
-
One of the South Africans who trump is allowing into the US has some strong views about Jews- Started by JimH52
- Replies: 5
-
Kristi Noem Appearing Before Congress Today....Painful To Watch, She Won't Answer A Simple Question Honestly- Started by Dr. Phosphorous
- Replies: 60
