WSJ: 'Nation Now Has Proof' of Hillary Scandals, But Leftist Media 'Devotes Front Pages to the Trump

Vigilante

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2014
51,327
18,077
2,290
Waiting on the Cowardly Dante!!
WikiLeaks has shown the collusion and corruption between the Beasty's campaign, and the LapDog media!!!!

The Wall Street Journal's Potomac Watch columnist Kimberley Strassel details the "devastating case against a Clinton presidency" that can be made by reviewing the WikiLeaks documents combined with what is already known in the public record. Strassel notes that although "the nation now has proof of pretty much everything [Hillary Clinton] has been accused of," the media "has almost uniformly ignored the flurry of bombshells, preferring to devote its front pages" to the story that Donald Trump "made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women."

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
 
"...preferring to devote its front pages" to the story that Donald Trump "made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women."

"Preferring" is a pretty goddamn p-whipped choice of words. What, are we really expected to be 8 year olds who don't understand how newspapers are owned and influenced by Big Money? It's bloody obvious both CNN and The Washington Post are nothing but mouth-pieces for Hillary. Same for fecken Google News. Do a search on her and 19 out of 20 stories are positive and do not mention the wikileaks emails.

It's disgraceful. I grew up with The Washington Post kicking ass on the corruption of Nixon...I naively thought they did it for ethical reasons. Here they are being blatantly and shamelessly tools for Hillary. They are in fact participating in a cover up. She deleted 33,000 emails after subpoena. She let 4 people needlessly die in Benghazi. She's been covering up Bill's sexual predatory behavior for decades. Anonymous will be releasing the sex vids on Halloween. Bill raping a 13 year old girl. I don't know how anyone will be able to legally watch it as it will be child porn, but perhaps the viewing numbers will be so astronomical as to make it unfair to prosecute anyone wanting to see the former leader of the free world raping a 13 year girl on Lolita Island.
 
"...preferring to devote its front pages" to the story that Donald Trump "made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women."

"Preferring" is a pretty goddamn p-whipped choice of words. What, are we really expected to be 8 year olds who don't understand how newspapers are owned and influenced by Big Money? It's bloody obvious both CNN and The Washington Post are nothing but mouth-pieces for Hillary. Same for fecken Google News. Do a search on her and 19 out of 20 stories are positive and do not mention the wikileaks emails.

It's disgraceful. I grew up with The Washington Post kicking ass on the corruption of Nixon...I naively thought they did it for ethical reasons. Here they are being blatantly and shamelessly tools for Hillary. They are in fact participating in a cover up. She deleted 33,000 emails after subpoena. She let 4 people needlessly die in Benghazi. She's been covering up Bill's sexual predatory behavior for decades. Anonymous will be releasing the sex vids on Halloween. Bill raping a 13 year old girl. I don't know how anyone will be able to legally watch it as it will be child porn, but perhaps the viewing numbers will be so astronomical as to make it unfair to prosecute anyone wanting to see the former leader of the free world raping a 13 year girl on Lolita Island.


Wow. Your head is just a big old ball of crazy string, isn't it?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
"...preferring to devote its front pages" to the story that Donald Trump "made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women."

"Preferring" is a pretty goddamn p-whipped choice of words. What, are we really expected to be 8 year olds who don't understand how newspapers are owned and influenced by Big Money? It's bloody obvious both CNN and The Washington Post are nothing but mouth-pieces for Hillary. Same for fecken Google News. Do a search on her and 19 out of 20 stories are positive and do not mention the wikileaks emails.

It's disgraceful. I grew up with The Washington Post kicking ass on the corruption of Nixon...I naively thought they did it for ethical reasons. Here they are being blatantly and shamelessly tools for Hillary. They are in fact participating in a cover up. She deleted 33,000 emails after subpoena. She let 4 people needlessly die in Benghazi. She's been covering up Bill's sexual predatory behavior for decades. Anonymous will be releasing the sex vids on Halloween. Bill raping a 13 year old girl. I don't know how anyone will be able to legally watch it as it will be child porn, but perhaps the viewing numbers will be so astronomical as to make it unfair to prosecute anyone wanting to see the former leader of the free world raping a 13 year girl on Lolita Island.


Wow. Your head is just a big old ball of crazy string, isn't it?
And you were hoping for a bowl of shit for lunch...surprise!!!
 
"...preferring to devote its front pages" to the story that Donald Trump "made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women."

"Preferring" is a pretty goddamn p-whipped choice of words. What, are we really expected to be 8 year olds who don't understand how newspapers are owned and influenced by Big Money? It's bloody obvious both CNN and The Washington Post are nothing but mouth-pieces for Hillary. Same for fecken Google News. Do a search on her and 19 out of 20 stories are positive and do not mention the wikileaks emails.

It's disgraceful. I grew up with The Washington Post kicking ass on the corruption of Nixon...I naively thought they did it for ethical reasons. Here they are being blatantly and shamelessly tools for Hillary. They are in fact participating in a cover up. She deleted 33,000 emails after subpoena. She let 4 people needlessly die in Benghazi. She's been covering up Bill's sexual predatory behavior for decades. Anonymous will be releasing the sex vids on Halloween. Bill raping a 13 year old girl. I don't know how anyone will be able to legally watch it as it will be child porn, but perhaps the viewing numbers will be so astronomical as to make it unfair to prosecute anyone wanting to see the former leader of the free world raping a 13 year girl on Lolita Island.


Wow. Your head is just a big old ball of crazy string, isn't it?
And you were hoping for a bowl of shit for lunch...surprise!!!

Nice try Vag, but your crap just isn't as funny as usual. Looks like you need new material.
 
"...preferring to devote its front pages" to the story that Donald Trump "made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women."

"Preferring" is a pretty goddamn p-whipped choice of words. What, are we really expected to be 8 year olds who don't understand how newspapers are owned and influenced by Big Money? It's bloody obvious both CNN and The Washington Post are nothing but mouth-pieces for Hillary. Same for fecken Google News. Do a search on her and 19 out of 20 stories are positive and do not mention the wikileaks emails.

It's disgraceful. I grew up with The Washington Post kicking ass on the corruption of Nixon...I naively thought they did it for ethical reasons. Here they are being blatantly and shamelessly tools for Hillary. They are in fact participating in a cover up. She deleted 33,000 emails after subpoena. She let 4 people needlessly die in Benghazi. She's been covering up Bill's sexual predatory behavior for decades. Anonymous will be releasing the sex vids on Halloween. Bill raping a 13 year old girl. I don't know how anyone will be able to legally watch it as it will be child porn, but perhaps the viewing numbers will be so astronomical as to make it unfair to prosecute anyone wanting to see the former leader of the free world raping a 13 year girl on Lolita Island.


Wow. Your head is just a big old ball of crazy string, isn't it?
Here's a new avie fer ya, Bullfrog.

 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
"...preferring to devote its front pages" to the story that Donald Trump "made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women."

"Preferring" is a pretty goddamn p-whipped choice of words. What, are we really expected to be 8 year olds who don't understand how newspapers are owned and influenced by Big Money? It's bloody obvious both CNN and The Washington Post are nothing but mouth-pieces for Hillary. Same for fecken Google News. Do a search on her and 19 out of 20 stories are positive and do not mention the wikileaks emails.

It's disgraceful. I grew up with The Washington Post kicking ass on the corruption of Nixon...I naively thought they did it for ethical reasons. Here they are being blatantly and shamelessly tools for Hillary. They are in fact participating in a cover up. She deleted 33,000 emails after subpoena. She let 4 people needlessly die in Benghazi. She's been covering up Bill's sexual predatory behavior for decades. Anonymous will be releasing the sex vids on Halloween. Bill raping a 13 year old girl. I don't know how anyone will be able to legally watch it as it will be child porn, but perhaps the viewing numbers will be so astronomical as to make it unfair to prosecute anyone wanting to see the former leader of the free world raping a 13 year girl on Lolita Island.


Wow. Your head is just a big old ball of crazy string, isn't it?
And you were hoping for a bowl of shit for lunch...surprise!!!

Nice try Vag, but your crap just isn't as funny as usual. Looks like you need new material.

Well don't let me shit on you...open your mouth!
 
Sorry. It's obvious you are full of shit. I didn't know you actually tried to aim it. You're just too dumb to laugh at lately.
 
"...preferring to devote its front pages" to the story that Donald Trump "made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women."

"Preferring" is a pretty goddamn p-whipped choice of words. What, are we really expected to be 8 year olds who don't understand how newspapers are owned and influenced by Big Money? It's bloody obvious both CNN and The Washington Post are nothing but mouth-pieces for Hillary. Same for fecken Google News. Do a search on her and 19 out of 20 stories are positive and do not mention the wikileaks emails.

It's disgraceful. I grew up with The Washington Post kicking ass on the corruption of Nixon...I naively thought they did it for ethical reasons. Here they are being blatantly and shamelessly tools for Hillary. They are in fact participating in a cover up. She deleted 33,000 emails after subpoena. She let 4 people needlessly die in Benghazi. She's been covering up Bill's sexual predatory behavior for decades. Anonymous will be releasing the sex vids on Halloween. Bill raping a 13 year old girl. I don't know how anyone will be able to legally watch it as it will be child porn, but perhaps the viewing numbers will be so astronomical as to make it unfair to prosecute anyone wanting to see the former leader of the free world raping a 13 year girl on Lolita Island.


Wow. Your head is just a big old ball of crazy string, isn't it?
Here's a new avie fer ya, Bullfrog.


I'll see of I can't whip one out for you when I get the chance.
 

Forum List

Back
Top