- Jun 22, 2020
- 23,173
- 26,364
- 2,288
And you, the biggest gullible dumbfuck on the site. Keep crying about the weather, it's funny as **** watching your intellectual impotence on display.
Wrong Again: 2020’s Failed Climate Doomsaying
- Thread starter Sunsettommy
- Start date
- Jun 22, 2020
- 23,173
- 26,364
- 2,288
You run a website from your mom's basement? That explains a lot.
alpine
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 3,535
- 809
- 130
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to liewww.theguardian.com
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
You come up with a scientific paper of a climate experiment that has gone through peer review where that experiment has been replicated and confirmed by other scientists.
Come on Einstein, show everyone your robust information.
He doesn't even try to defend Dr. Hansen's 1988 paper here in the thread....., warmist/alarmists stupidly think Scenario B is correct....
it is accurate enough for a study done 30 years ago...
it demonstrated the type of increase we should expect in a linear co2 emission increase quite well...
i also showed you how well it fits in once you adjust the model with the knowledge which he didnt have 30 years ago and had to assume...
the stupidity in your copy/paste post that expects to prove anything to anyone by bashing an unlikely scenario in a 30 year old study stands however...
alpine
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 3,535
- 809
- 130
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
You come up with a scientific paper of a climate experiment that has gone through peer review where that experiment has been replicated and confirmed by other scientists.
Come on Einstein, show everyone your robust information.
He doesn't even try to defend Dr. Hansen's 1988 paper here in the thread....., warmist/alarmists stupidly think Scenario B is correct....
so i decided to create categories for you folks so i can keep track of all you, since you are not the only dumb ***** i have to deal on this board, unavoidably i lose track of you...
so here are the categories you will have to mention before expecting a response from now on;
df1. what climate change, my grand pa always told me about hot summers and cold winters...
df2. ahh that climate change, so what, it does change all the time...
df3. so what if the planet is warming, we dont have any control over it and i like it hot anyways...
df4. ok, planet is warming and it is going to shift the climate outside of the comfort zone for humans and survival zone for tons of species that sustains the life on the planet, but models predictions are off by X years, so why bother now, and this dude writing on this website from his basement thinks it will take another X years, so relaxxx...
so please let me know which dumb **** you are before i can make points to your brain farts here...
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
You come up with a scientific paper of a climate experiment that has gone through peer review where that experiment has been replicated and confirmed by other scientists.
Come on Einstein, show everyone your robust information.
He doesn't even try to defend Dr. Hansen's 1988 paper here in the thread....., warmist/alarmists stupidly think Scenario B is correct....
it is accurate enough for a study done 30 years ago...
it demonstrated the type of increase we should expect in a linear co2 emission increase quite well...
i also showed you how well it fits in once you adjust the model with the knowledge which he didnt have 30 years ago and had to assume...
the stupidity in your copy/paste post that expects to prove anything to anyone by bashing an unlikely scenario in a 30 year old study stands however...
No, it's not. It is catastrophically wrong. That makes it crap.
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 16,278
- 13,995
- 2,400
- Thread starter
- #86
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
You come up with a scientific paper of a climate experiment that has gone through peer review where that experiment has been replicated and confirmed by other scientists.
Come on Einstein, show everyone your robust information.
He doesn't even try to defend Dr. Hansen's 1988 paper here in the thread....., warmist/alarmists stupidly think Scenario B is correct....
it is accurate enough for a study done 30 years ago...
it demonstrated the type of increase we should expect in a linear co2 emission increase quite well...
i also showed you how well it fits in once you adjust the model with the knowledge which he didnt have 30 years ago and had to assume...
the stupidity in your copy/paste post that expects to prove anything to anyone by bashing an unlikely scenario in a 30 year old study stands however...
You made clear you have no idea what Scenario B really is. Go read about it at post 16 and learn why I am LAUGHING at your ignorance.
Go tell everyone HERE what Scenario B is about, I dare you!
alpine
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 3,535
- 809
- 130
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
You come up with a scientific paper of a climate experiment that has gone through peer review where that experiment has been replicated and confirmed by other scientists.
Come on Einstein, show everyone your robust information.
He doesn't even try to defend Dr. Hansen's 1988 paper here in the thread....., warmist/alarmists stupidly think Scenario B is correct....
it is accurate enough for a study done 30 years ago...
it demonstrated the type of increase we should expect in a linear co2 emission increase quite well...
i also showed you how well it fits in once you adjust the model with the knowledge which he didnt have 30 years ago and had to assume...
the stupidity in your copy/paste post that expects to prove anything to anyone by bashing an unlikely scenario in a 30 year old study stands however...
No, it's not. It is catastrophically wrong. That makes it crap.
ahh, let me guess, df4 here...
no it is not, thats just your opinion...
alpine
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 3,535
- 809
- 130
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
You come up with a scientific paper of a climate experiment that has gone through peer review where that experiment has been replicated and confirmed by other scientists.
Come on Einstein, show everyone your robust information.
He doesn't even try to defend Dr. Hansen's 1988 paper here in the thread....., warmist/alarmists stupidly think Scenario B is correct....
it is accurate enough for a study done 30 years ago...
it demonstrated the type of increase we should expect in a linear co2 emission increase quite well...
i also showed you how well it fits in once you adjust the model with the knowledge which he didnt have 30 years ago and had to assume...
the stupidity in your copy/paste post that expects to prove anything to anyone by bashing an unlikely scenario in a 30 year old study stands however...
You made clear you have no idea what Scenario B really is. Go read about it at post 16 and learn why I am LAUGHING at your ignorance.
Go tell everyone HERE what Scenario B is about, I dare you!
it is a linear increase scenario, which is what it was in reality...
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 16,278
- 13,995
- 2,400
- Thread starter
- #89
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
You come up with a scientific paper of a climate experiment that has gone through peer review where that experiment has been replicated and confirmed by other scientists.
Come on Einstein, show everyone your robust information.
He doesn't even try to defend Dr. Hansen's 1988 paper here in the thread....., warmist/alarmists stupidly think Scenario B is correct....
it is accurate enough for a study done 30 years ago...
it demonstrated the type of increase we should expect in a linear co2 emission increase quite well...
i also showed you how well it fits in once you adjust the model with the knowledge which he didnt have 30 years ago and had to assume...
the stupidity in your copy/paste post that expects to prove anything to anyone by bashing an unlikely scenario in a 30 year old study stands however...
You made clear you have no idea what Scenario B really is. Go read about it at post 16 and learn why I am LAUGHING at your ignorance.
Go tell everyone HERE what Scenario B is about, I dare you!
it is a linear increase scenario, which is what it was in reality...
You can't answer the dare because you have no idea what Scenario B is.
alpine
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 3,535
- 809
- 130
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
You come up with a scientific paper of a climate experiment that has gone through peer review where that experiment has been replicated and confirmed by other scientists.
Come on Einstein, show everyone your robust information.
He doesn't even try to defend Dr. Hansen's 1988 paper here in the thread....., warmist/alarmists stupidly think Scenario B is correct....
it is accurate enough for a study done 30 years ago...
it demonstrated the type of increase we should expect in a linear co2 emission increase quite well...
i also showed you how well it fits in once you adjust the model with the knowledge which he didnt have 30 years ago and had to assume...
the stupidity in your copy/paste post that expects to prove anything to anyone by bashing an unlikely scenario in a 30 year old study stands however...
You made clear you have no idea what Scenario B really is. Go read about it at post 16 and learn why I am LAUGHING at your ignorance.
Go tell everyone HERE what Scenario B is about, I dare you!
it is a linear increase scenario, which is what it was in reality...
You can't answer the dare because you have no idea what Scenario B is.
i already told you ^^^^ there...
you are incapable of reading and understanding...
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
You come up with a scientific paper of a climate experiment that has gone through peer review where that experiment has been replicated and confirmed by other scientists.
Come on Einstein, show everyone your robust information.
He doesn't even try to defend Dr. Hansen's 1988 paper here in the thread....., warmist/alarmists stupidly think Scenario B is correct....
it is accurate enough for a study done 30 years ago...
it demonstrated the type of increase we should expect in a linear co2 emission increase quite well...
i also showed you how well it fits in once you adjust the model with the knowledge which he didnt have 30 years ago and had to assume...
the stupidity in your copy/paste post that expects to prove anything to anyone by bashing an unlikely scenario in a 30 year old study stands however...
No, it's not. It is catastrophically wrong. That makes it crap.
ahh, let me guess, df4 here...
no it is not, thats just your opinion...
An opinion based on fact. Your opinion is based on computer derived fiction, and your innate stupidity.
alpine
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 3,535
- 809
- 130
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
30 years later, deniers are still lying about Hansen’s amazing global warming prediction | Dana Nuccitelli
Dana Nuccitelli: Koch paychecks seem to be strong motivators to lie
no credible scientist predicts a single number for a 2 decade span, neither did hansen...
he had 3 models low/mid/high and they were beyond accurate, predicted everything as they happened...
clueless climate retards however take one number out of its context and try to hide their stupidity behind it...
you can lie as much as you like, but the fact is that you cant lie against a warming globe anymore and thats a tell for anyone interested in the subject beyond politics and ignorance surrounding it...
Ignorance being, you personally use every manmade gadget that contributed to climate change and have the stupidity to shout at others it's their fault and stop denying manmade climate change. That's how stupid you clowns are.It appears I've triggered a moron with facts once again. Lulz.none of them happened because smart logical people did something other than bitching to stop them from happening...
i know its hard for simpletons like you to comprehend but thats the whole reason we study these subjects to begin with; to do something about them...
if it was up to people like you, most of them would happen with probably much worse consequences...
Learn some grammar before calling other people simpletons, fool.really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
Certainly long before you ... you offer nothing ... climate's not changing ... look out your window and see ...
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
You must be determined to the dumbest, most ignorant warmist/alarmist in the forum membership list, You need to try harder to stand out more to make it easier to get into first place on the list. It is revealing that many warmist/alarmists have avoided this thread, Mamooth, edyethnic, oldrocks, abu afak, cnm, crepitus and many more have stayed away, maybe they are a little smarter than you, to be fighting against a well supported article exposing a lot of prediction failures.
Westfall has a science background, YOU have a background in bullshit, the difference is clear!
You have yet to challenge post one article, it remains unchallenged.
really...
and since when you realized this law i wonder...
first there was no climate change,
then updated to no man made climate change...
wonder when the next update will download for you folks...
When did I say there is no climate change? As usual the weak minded twerp, you, resort to non sequitur attacks and lies.
The climate is ALWAYS changing. That is a simple fact. The argument is whether mankind has an impact. And, to date, no empirical data has ever been presented that shows man having an impact.
That is a fact.
But we all know you don't do facts.
you never said anything...
you have no mind...
you are merely parroting what your uncle jimmy shared in his facebook timeline from a moron who is babbling some conspiracy theories from his basement..
but your uncle jimmy is not a climate scientist...
he is a used car salesman...
So what. If his information is accurate, and it is, that's all that matters. You are a parrot, spewing propaganda. You haven't stated a single fact in all the time you've been here.
You are also a sock of some loser that got banned from here for being a useless troll.
I would invite you to learn something, but you're not capable.
no, i got banned here because some sore loser mod got offended... thats all...
No, you got banned because you are a troll. You add nothing to any discussion you enter because you're too stupid to.
so we have one dumb **** who is unaware of climate change...
we have another who is unaware whats causing it...
and we have one another who is unaware humans phased out cfcs to save the ozone...
and another who claims a research which predicted a warming planet is inaccurate...
and last dumb **** who thinks he is a scientist and thinks his brain farts are adding something to anything...
i could agree the last guy tho, he sure adds something...
a stinky smell that is...
especially about his bs science background...
You're the brain dead gullible umbilical with it all. Your sherp rhetoric started with global warming, then when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past, it morphed into climate change. When it was pointed out that the climate gas continually changed in the earth's umpteen billion year history, the doomsters are now bleating on speed of climate change. Make your ******* minds up where you want to be.
When arguing co2, the doomsters only refer to hundreds of thousands of years ago. Go further back you bakes, co2 got up to 8,000ppm, it's a little over 400ppm now. And for sea level, it's umpteen metres lower than what's it been. As for ice, the earth has had 5+ ice ages, we've not melted ******* one of them.
Clueless, ******* clueless these doomster ******* inbred retards.
"...when it was pointed out there's been greater warm and cold periods in the past..."
this explains the logic in debate here...
it is the warming trend that is being studied in climate science...
not the lows nor highs...
thats why it is a waste of time to discuss anything with you dumb **** people...
you are not even aware of the basics and yet you think you are scientists...
Do you even know what the replication crisis is? No you don't. You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit, the experiments are never repeated.
Wasting my time with you ignorant lot.
"You doomsters just copy and paste the scientific shit"
yes, we will keep copy and pasting scientific shit...
and you can keep copy pasting your bull shit...
You come up with a scientific paper of a climate experiment that has gone through peer review where that experiment has been replicated and confirmed by other scientists.
Come on Einstein, show everyone your robust information.
He doesn't even try to defend Dr. Hansen's 1988 paper here in the thread....., warmist/alarmists stupidly think Scenario B is correct....
it is accurate enough for a study done 30 years ago...
it demonstrated the type of increase we should expect in a linear co2 emission increase quite well...
i also showed you how well it fits in once you adjust the model with the knowledge which he didnt have 30 years ago and had to assume...
the stupidity in your copy/paste post that expects to prove anything to anyone by bashing an unlikely scenario in a 30 year old study stands however...
No, it's not. It is catastrophically wrong. That makes it crap.
ahh, let me guess, df4 here...
no it is not, thats just your opinion...
An opinion based on fact. Your opinion is based on computer derived fiction, and your innate stupidity.
wrong spelling there...
your opinion is based on farce...
the fact is that the model did indeed predict a warming planet as a result of the green house gases...
and that fact remains solid till today, backed by a lot of scientific data...
and what backs you up is a guy typing from his basement...
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 16,278
- 13,995
- 2,400
- Thread starter
- #93
Alpine shows excellent proof he doesn't know what Scenario B is with his reply:
He stated this as what he thinks Scenario B is:
I gave this broken head a link to the source he obviously never read what Dr. Hansen wrote, he made this revealing reply at post 83, showing his abject ignorance in what Scenario B is:
"it is accurate enough for a study done 30 years ago...
it demonstrated the type of increase we should expect in a linear co2 emission increase quite well...
i also showed you how well it fits in once you adjust the model with the knowledge which he didnt have 30 years ago and had to assume...
the stupidity in your copy/paste post that expects to prove anything to anyone by bashing an unlikely scenario in a 30 year old study stands however... "
bolding mine to show what this fool says about CO2 emissions, he states that CO2 emission increases from 1988.
Now here is what Dr. Hansen actually stated for Scenario B
"ORIGINAL CAPTION: Fig. 3. Annual mean global surface air temperature computed for trace gas scenarios A, B, and C described in reference 1. [Scenario A assumes continued growth rates of trace gas emissions typical of the past 20 years, i.e., about 1.5% yr^-1 emission growth; scenario B has emission rates approximately fixed at current rates; scenario C drastically reduces trace gas emissions between 1990 and 2000.] The shaded range is an estimate of global temperature during the peak of the current and previous interglacial periods, about 6,000 and 120,000 years before present, respectively. The zero point for observations is the 1951-1980 mean (reference 6); the zero point for the model is the control run mean. "
Scenario B is about CO2 emission at fixed current rate for 1988, but the post one article shows it has increased a lot since 1988, as I showed at post 24
Scenario B is obviously wrong, CO2 emissions have gone up since 1988 while his scenario B is CO2 stays at 1988 rate (no increase at all).
Scenario A allows for increasing CO2 emissions from 1988 onwards.
Dr. Hansen wrote,
"1. [Scenario A assumes continued growth rates of trace gas emissions typical of the past 20 years, i.e., about 1.5% yr^-1 emission growth; "
bolding mine
It was actually 1.9%/yr but close enough, but his predicted temperature trend based on this scenario A was way off, as shown here:
Scenario A has a yearly CO2 emission increase of 1.5%/yr
Scenario B has a yearly CO2 emission increase of 0%/yr
Scenario C has a yearly CO2 DECREASE of (amount not specified) Dr. Hansen wrote, "scenario C drastically reduces trace gas emissions between 1990 and 2000. "
You have been smashed, I am done here showing how ignorant and stupid you are.
He stated this as what he thinks Scenario B is:
I gave this broken head a link to the source he obviously never read what Dr. Hansen wrote, he made this revealing reply at post 83, showing his abject ignorance in what Scenario B is:
"it is accurate enough for a study done 30 years ago...
it demonstrated the type of increase we should expect in a linear co2 emission increase quite well...
i also showed you how well it fits in once you adjust the model with the knowledge which he didnt have 30 years ago and had to assume...
the stupidity in your copy/paste post that expects to prove anything to anyone by bashing an unlikely scenario in a 30 year old study stands however... "
bolding mine to show what this fool says about CO2 emissions, he states that CO2 emission increases from 1988.
Now here is what Dr. Hansen actually stated for Scenario B
"ORIGINAL CAPTION: Fig. 3. Annual mean global surface air temperature computed for trace gas scenarios A, B, and C described in reference 1. [Scenario A assumes continued growth rates of trace gas emissions typical of the past 20 years, i.e., about 1.5% yr^-1 emission growth; scenario B has emission rates approximately fixed at current rates; scenario C drastically reduces trace gas emissions between 1990 and 2000.] The shaded range is an estimate of global temperature during the peak of the current and previous interglacial periods, about 6,000 and 120,000 years before present, respectively. The zero point for observations is the 1951-1980 mean (reference 6); the zero point for the model is the control run mean. "
Scenario B is about CO2 emission at fixed current rate for 1988, but the post one article shows it has increased a lot since 1988, as I showed at post 24
Scenario B is obviously wrong, CO2 emissions have gone up since 1988 while his scenario B is CO2 stays at 1988 rate (no increase at all).
Scenario A allows for increasing CO2 emissions from 1988 onwards.
Dr. Hansen wrote,
"1. [Scenario A assumes continued growth rates of trace gas emissions typical of the past 20 years, i.e., about 1.5% yr^-1 emission growth; "
bolding mine
It was actually 1.9%/yr but close enough, but his predicted temperature trend based on this scenario A was way off, as shown here:
Scenario A has a yearly CO2 emission increase of 1.5%/yr
Scenario B has a yearly CO2 emission increase of 0%/yr
Scenario C has a yearly CO2 DECREASE of (amount not specified) Dr. Hansen wrote, "scenario C drastically reduces trace gas emissions between 1990 and 2000. "
You have been smashed, I am done here showing how ignorant and stupid you are.
Last edited:
alpine
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 3,535
- 809
- 130
so what you are trying to say is that your graph up there shows an exponential co2 emission growth since 1988?
be careful answering this one...
alpine
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 3,535
- 809
- 130
so what you are trying to say is that your graph up there shows an exponential co2 emission growth since 1988?
be careful answering this one...
looks like tommy doesnt know what exponential means...
and yet he thinks he smashed something...
that was most likely his balls...
the greenhouse gas emission/concentration increase was not exponential as suggested in the scenario a, neither did hansen expect that to happen...
it has been even lower than what he was suggesting for scenario b where a linear increase of all current ghg continued...
some reasons for that could be human intervention eliminating some of those gases entirely and new data also changing our understanding of how some others reacted over time, like methane...
so dismissing current up to date studies and trying to draw conclusions out of a 30 year old study is pseudo-science at best and some brain farce at the most...
alpine
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 3,535
- 809
- 130
so what you are trying to say is that your graph up there shows an exponential co2 emission growth since 1988?
be careful answering this one...
looks like tommy doesnt know what exponential means...
and yet he thinks he smashed something...
that was most likely his balls...
the greenhouse gas emission/concentration increase was not exponential as suggested in the scenario a, neither did hansen expect that to happen...
it has been even lower than what he was suggesting for scenario b where a linear increase of all current ghg continued...
some reasons for that could be human intervention eliminating some of those gases entirely and new data also changing our understanding of how some others reacted over time, like methane...
so dismissing current up to date studies and trying to draw conclusions out of a 30 year old study is pseudo-science at best and some brain farce at the most...
tommy still mia...
getting his crushed balls treated i bet...
not only he failed to understand the meaning of exponential, he also failed to realize greenhouse gas doesnt just mean co2, but all sorts of other gases humans have been trying to prevent emissions of alongside co2 for decades and in some cases even completely removed from the atmosphere all together which very much contributed to the fact that scenario a tommy has been bashing didnt become reality to begin with...
he thinks just by doing nothing planet miraculously survived which gives him the sense that climate was not changing to begin with but in reality a lot of smart people put a lot of effort to make it happen, to provide a bright future for people like tommy and his children...
and they will continue to do so even tho tommy and alikes try to self-sabotage themselves and whole humanity by electing anti-science imbeciles as representatives to high offices...
even tho tommy will keep making shit up about some self made "farce"... sorry "facts"... and miss the whole point of climate science, science will keep working in the benefit of tommy...
we are wishing tommy best of luck in his future endeavors bullshitting on message boards on subjects he is clearly has no understanding of other than copy pasting some farce from websites thats being managed by some self proclaimed expert idiots typing from their basements...
2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 113,038
- 53,530
- 2,290
All of the things the cult leaders got wrong about climate..........so why do morons want us to keep listening to them?
1. Average global temperature up 3 degrees Celsius
2. Global emissions
3. Emissions from India and China
4. No snow on Mount Kilimanjaro
5. Rising sea levels in the Sunshine State
6. People will become unfamiliar with snow
7. Pacific islands economies devastated
8. Global conflict and nuclear war
9. The end of Arctic ice
10. Glaciers gone at Glacier National Park
pjmedia.com
They were wrong on all 10, and if you want to understand how wrong they were, read the article and see the details....
1. Average global temperature up 3 degrees Celsius
2. Global emissions
3. Emissions from India and China
4. No snow on Mount Kilimanjaro
5. Rising sea levels in the Sunshine State
6. People will become unfamiliar with snow
7. Pacific islands economies devastated
8. Global conflict and nuclear war
9. The end of Arctic ice
10. Glaciers gone at Glacier National Park
Egg on Their Faces: 10 Climate Alarmist Predictions for 2020 That Went Horribly Wrong
Long before Beto O’Rourke claimed the world only had 10 years left for humans to act against c
pjmedia.com
They were wrong on all 10, and if you want to understand how wrong they were, read the article and see the details....
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 160,080
- 86,510
- 2,645
Well, they may be completely wrong, but, er, um, the science is settled!!All of the things the cult leaders got wrong about climate..........so why do morons want us to keep listening to them?
1. Average global temperature up 3 degrees Celsius
2. Global emissions
3. Emissions from India and China
4. No snow on Mount Kilimanjaro
5. Rising sea levels in the Sunshine State
6. People will become unfamiliar with snow
7. Pacific islands economies devastated
8. Global conflict and nuclear war
9. The end of Arctic ice
10. Glaciers gone at Glacier National Park
Egg on Their Faces: 10 Climate Alarmist Predictions for 2020 That Went Horribly Wrong
Long before Beto O’Rourke claimed the world only had 10 years left for humans to act against c
They were wrong on all 10, and if you want to understand how wrong they were, read the article and see the details....
Concerned American
Diamond Member
But, but, but, the science. BS!All of the things the cult leaders got wrong about climate..........so why do morons want us to keep listening to them?
1. Average global temperature up 3 degrees Celsius
2. Global emissions
3. Emissions from India and China
4. No snow on Mount Kilimanjaro
5. Rising sea levels in the Sunshine State
6. People will become unfamiliar with snow
7. Pacific islands economies devastated
8. Global conflict and nuclear war
9. The end of Arctic ice
10. Glaciers gone at Glacier National Park
Egg on Their Faces: 10 Climate Alarmist Predictions for 2020 That Went Horribly Wrong
Long before Beto O’Rourke claimed the world only had 10 years left for humans to act against c
They were wrong on all 10, and if you want to understand how wrong they were, read the article and see the details....
flacaltenn
Diamond Member
All of the things the cult leaders got wrong about climate..........so why do morons want us to keep listening to them?
1. Average global temperature up 3 degrees Celsius
2. Global emissions
3. Emissions from India and China
4. No snow on Mount Kilimanjaro
5. Rising sea levels in the Sunshine State
6. People will become unfamiliar with snow
7. Pacific islands economies devastated
8. Global conflict and nuclear war
9. The end of Arctic ice
10. Glaciers gone at Glacier National Park
Egg on Their Faces: 10 Climate Alarmist Predictions for 2020 That Went Horribly Wrong
Long before Beto O’Rourke claimed the world only had 10 years left for humans to act against c
They were wrong on all 10, and if you want to understand how wrong they were, read the article and see the details....
There is a small incremental warming.. But nothing like the models ever predicted.. And in fact, the MILLENNIAL average before the 18th century was about 280ppm of CO2 in the atmos.. Even with the Industrial Revolution and continued use of fossil fuels --- we're at about 435ppm CO2... Haven't reached even the 1st doubling since before the pilgrims landed on wind power..
And for every doubling -- the BASIC power of CO2 is to add about 1.1DegC to the surface temperature.. We're NOT FAR from that basic physics/chemistry calculation WITHOUT modeling and doom/disaster predictions.. And for the NEXT DOUBLING -- you'd need TWICE AS MUCH CO2!!! Instead of doubling 280ppm -- you'd be doubling 560 !!
So when do you think we go from 560 to 1120???? Won't be anytime in this Century...
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Trump has reversed the balance of power in the Middle East- Started by Hafar1014
- Replies: 4
-
-
Good breakdown of the religious aspects of the Iran war (3.5.26)- Started by Invisibleflash
- Replies: 5
-
DEMS expected to keep DHS unfunded putting their Trump Hate ahead of American's security.- Started by MarathonMike
- Replies: 1
-
