Wow

Good luck with that. Control of the government is a pendulum, it always swings back.
You don't represent a legitimate wing of politics anymore.

The political pendulum does always swing back, but sometimes that takes decades, as it did when the Democrats ascended under FDR, and sometimes the other party is no longer there to have that pendulum swing back to it as happened to the Whigs.
The Democrats aren't a principled left wing party anymore, they have no reason to take power.

The pendulum swings towards people like me when the right goes out of control, not the fascist SJWs.
 
None of which has anything to do with what I said.
Are you retarded?

You moronically regarded the fabled national "popular vote" as a reason why "liberalism" is fine and buckeye correctly pointed out that New York and California having much higher turnouts than most of the red states is the cause.

Everything he said directly rebutted what you said.
It matters not where Liberals are, they received the most votes. As it happened in this election, it didn't help win the presidency, but it's retarded to claim Liberalism is horrible when most voters voted for a Liberal.


Its cool, you go with that, get crazier, protest more, cause more damage and mayhem, people love that.
You racking up numbers in a city, and well keep controlling the congress and state governments
Good luck with that. Control of the government is a pendulum, it always swings back.
You don't represent a legitimate wing of politics anymore.
LOL

Sure, keep telling yourself that. Meanwhile, the Democrat candidate for president got 3 million more votes than the Republican candidate and Democrat candidates for Senate got over 10 million more votes than Republican candidates.

Democrats' problems aren't in numbers -- it's in location. Democrats and Liberals aren't dispersed throughout the nation like Republicans and conservatives.
 
Are you retarded?

You moronically regarded the fabled national "popular vote" as a reason why "liberalism" is fine and buckeye correctly pointed out that New York and California having much higher turnouts than most of the red states is the cause.

Everything he said directly rebutted what you said.
It matters not where Liberals are, they received the most votes. As it happened in this election, it didn't help win the presidency, but it's retarded to claim Liberalism is horrible when most voters voted for a Liberal.


Its cool, you go with that, get crazier, protest more, cause more damage and mayhem, people love that.
You racking up numbers in a city, and well keep controlling the congress and state governments
Good luck with that. Control of the government is a pendulum, it always swings back.
You don't represent a legitimate wing of politics anymore.
LOL

Sure, keep telling yourself that. Meanwhile, the Democrat candidate for president got 3 million more votes than the Republican candidate and Democrat candidates for Senate got over 10 million more votes than Republican candidates.

Democrats' problems aren't in numbers -- it's in location. Democrats and Liberals aren't dispersed throughout the nation like Republicans and conservatives.



Not everyone agrees with that.
 
Are you retarded?

You moronically regarded the fabled national "popular vote" as a reason why "liberalism" is fine and buckeye correctly pointed out that New York and California having much higher turnouts than most of the red states is the cause.

Everything he said directly rebutted what you said.
It matters not where Liberals are, they received the most votes. As it happened in this election, it didn't help win the presidency, but it's retarded to claim Liberalism is horrible when most voters voted for a Liberal.


Its cool, you go with that, get crazier, protest more, cause more damage and mayhem, people love that.
You racking up numbers in a city, and well keep controlling the congress and state governments
Good luck with that. Control of the government is a pendulum, it always swings back.
You don't represent a legitimate wing of politics anymore.
LOL

Sure, keep telling yourself that. Meanwhile, the Democrat candidate for president got 3 million more votes than the Republican candidate and Democrat candidates for Senate got over 10 million more votes than Republican candidates.

Democrats' problems aren't in numbers -- it's in location. Democrats and Liberals aren't dispersed throughout the nation like Republicans and conservatives.
Name a left wing position that "liberal" minorities support....
I am far to the left of any prominent minority politician in America and you idiots constantly call me a right winger.

Democrats are nothing but the hate white people and (white)Christians party, regardless of whether you are intelligent enough to see that or not(read Guno's posts for some insight if you have to).
 
It matters not where Liberals are, they received the most votes. As it happened in this election, it didn't help win the presidency, but it's retarded to claim Liberalism is horrible when most voters voted for a Liberal.


Its cool, you go with that, get crazier, protest more, cause more damage and mayhem, people love that.
You racking up numbers in a city, and well keep controlling the congress and state governments
Good luck with that. Control of the government is a pendulum, it always swings back.
You don't represent a legitimate wing of politics anymore.
LOL

Sure, keep telling yourself that. Meanwhile, the Democrat candidate for president got 3 million more votes than the Republican candidate and Democrat candidates for Senate got over 10 million more votes than Republican candidates.

Democrats' problems aren't in numbers -- it's in location. Democrats and Liberals aren't dispersed throughout the nation like Republicans and conservatives.
Name a left wing position that "liberal" minorities support....
I am far to the left of any prominent minority politician in America and you idiots constantly call me a right winger.

Democrats are nothing but the hate white people and (white)Christians party, regardless of whether you are intelligent enough to see that or not(read Guno's posts for some insight if you have to).
National health care
 
Its cool, you go with that, get crazier, protest more, cause more damage and mayhem, people love that.
You racking up numbers in a city, and well keep controlling the congress and state governments
Good luck with that. Control of the government is a pendulum, it always swings back.
You don't represent a legitimate wing of politics anymore.
LOL

Sure, keep telling yourself that. Meanwhile, the Democrat candidate for president got 3 million more votes than the Republican candidate and Democrat candidates for Senate got over 10 million more votes than Republican candidates.

Democrats' problems aren't in numbers -- it's in location. Democrats and Liberals aren't dispersed throughout the nation like Republicans and conservatives.
Name a left wing position that "liberal" minorities support....
I am far to the left of any prominent minority politician in America and you idiots constantly call me a right winger.

Democrats are nothing but the hate white people and (white)Christians party, regardless of whether you are intelligent enough to see that or not(read Guno's posts for some insight if you have to).
National health care
Hitler supported that too.

Non-white Democrats are far-right nationalists who directly benefit from the masochism of the white left.

Do you think Chicano supremacists oppose or support open borders in the US?
 
I assume the dying gentleman had some form of dementia.

I don't know what the rest of y'all have as an excuse.
 
Back
Top Bottom