Wow

[Camp]

What a load that is.

owebo uses this dopey illustration endlessly. As recently as yesterday he was challenged to use words to explain fascism instead of his dopey illustration. He couldn't do it. He is stuck on stupid and believes his graph or whatever that illustration is, offers some kind of academic viability to his nonsense.
Hey, owebo, can you define fascism without using an illustration? Can you string together some words to form a coherent couple of sentences to define "fascism" or are you totally reliant on misrepresentative pictures?

 

[cnm]

Yes, we don't want to be a shit eating democracy. That is just another word for socialism.

Where do they come from? Off a conveyor belt somewhere?

 

[owebo]

What a load that is.

owebo uses this dopey illustration endlessly. As recently as yesterday he was challenged to use words to explain fascism instead of his dopey illustration. He couldn't do it. He is stuck on stupid and believes his graph or whatever that illustration is, offers some kind of academic viability to his nonsense.
Hey, owebo, can you define fascism without using an illustration? Can you string together some words to form a coherent couple of sentences to define "fascism" or are you totally reliant on misrepresentative pictures?

It eviserates your propaganda instantly to even the most poorly educated of your slaves and shows them clearly where you stand....

I understand why you hate it and it's simplicity.....it is a powerful piece of truth....

 

[Camp]

What a load that is.

owebo uses this dopey illustration endlessly. As recently as yesterday he was challenged to use words to explain fascism instead of his dopey illustration. He couldn't do it. He is stuck on stupid and believes his graph or whatever that illustration is, offers some kind of academic viability to his nonsense.
Hey, owebo, can you define fascism without using an illustration? Can you string together some words to form a coherent couple of sentences to define "fascism" or are you totally reliant on misrepresentative pictures?

It eviserates your propaganda instantly to even the most poorly educated of your slaves and shows them clearly where you stand....

I understand why you hate it and it's simplicity.....it is a powerful piece of truth....

Now is where you will deflect and evade defining what fascism is. All of your further responses will be nothing more than escapes from having to use an academic definition of fascism. You prove yourself to be a classical example of a brainwashed fool.

 

[owebo]

What a load that is.

owebo uses this dopey illustration endlessly. As recently as yesterday he was challenged to use words to explain fascism instead of his dopey illustration. He couldn't do it. He is stuck on stupid and believes his graph or whatever that illustration is, offers some kind of academic viability to his nonsense.
Hey, owebo, can you define fascism without using an illustration? Can you string together some words to form a coherent couple of sentences to define "fascism" or are you totally reliant on misrepresentative pictures?

It eviserates your propaganda instantly to even the most poorly educated of your slaves and shows them clearly where you stand....

I understand why you hate it and it's simplicity.....it is a powerful piece of truth....

Now is where you will deflect and evade defining what fascism is. All of your further responses will be nothing more than escapes from having to use an academic definition of fascism. You prove yourself to be a classical example of a brainwashed fool.

My advice to you, walk right.....quickly.....

 

[Rustic]

What a load that is.

owebo uses this dopey illustration endlessly. As recently as yesterday he was challenged to use words to explain fascism instead of his dopey illustration. He couldn't do it. He is stuck on stupid and believes his graph or whatever that illustration is, offers some kind of academic viability to his nonsense.
Hey, owebo, can you define fascism without using an illustration? Can you string together some words to form a coherent couple of sentences to define "fascism" or are you totally reliant on misrepresentative pictures?

It eviserates your propaganda instantly to even the most poorly educated of your slaves and shows them clearly where you stand....

I understand why you hate it and it's simplicity.....it is a powerful piece of truth....

Now is where you will deflect and evade defining what fascism is. All of your further responses will be nothing more than escapes from having to use an academic definition of fascism. You prove yourself to be a classical example of a brainwashed fool.

Says the control freak...

 

[cnm]

I'm curious, how does it show where we purportedly stand? I see no footprints on it.

 

[owebo]

I'm curious, how does it show where we purportedly stand? I see no footprints on it.

You....where you stand....

 

[cnm]

You....where you stand....

How does the diagram show that? I see no footprints on it.

 

[cnm]

Oh, never mind.

Took me a little bit but the penny has dropped, I realise you've no idea what you're talking about. My bad.

 

[Witchit]

Democratism is a cult.

Holyfuckingshit!

democratism

the theory, system, or principles of democracy​

It's sad enough to see your pre-K level intellect limits you to, I know you are but what am I; but to watch you ridicule democracy is ******* hysterical.

There is nothing democratic about the democrat party.
And liberalism is.much more of.a.culr than consevstism. We dont need politics run our entire lives to live. We go to work and dont NEED to discuss politics every second.

Your opinion is noted but that has nothing to do with that @ptbW ridiculing democracy because he's too stupid to know the word, "democratism," is applicable to a system of government, not a political party.

You rightwing rubes crack me up!

True its the process of making an institutions more democratic. But what both know he meant the democrat party. Which is why I used liberal, although true liberalism is great, modern American liberalism is utterly horrible and to what I was referring.

Again, your opinion is noted. Who knows why you felt compelled to repeat it?

It's the only point s/h/it has.

 

[owebo]

Oh, never mind.

Took me a little bit but the penny has dropped, I realise you've no idea what you're talking about. My bad.

It's the only position you have left to take....

 

[buckeye45_73]

Holyfuckingshit!

democratism

the theory, system, or principles of democracy​

It's sad enough to see your pre-K level intellect limits you to, I know you are but what am I; but to watch you ridicule democracy is ******* hysterical.

There is nothing democratic about the democrat party.
And liberalism is.much more of.a.culr than consevstism. We dont need politics run our entire lives to live. We go to work and dont NEED to discuss politics every second.

Your opinion is noted but that has nothing to do with that @ptbW ridiculing democracy because he's too stupid to know the word, "democratism," is applicable to a system of government, not a political party.

You rightwing rubes crack me up!

True its the process of making an institutions more democratic. But what both know he meant the democrat party. Which is why I used liberal, although true liberalism is great, modern American liberalism is utterly horrible and to what I was referring.

Again, your opinion is noted. Who knows why you felt compelled to repeat it?

It's the only point s/h/it has.

No the left is too stupid to understand, doo i try to say it in a different way

 

[ptbw forever]

If we were a democracy Trump would have campaigned differently and a combination of Trump's determination, his celebrity and his riches would have demolished the poor little cuckquean far worse than his margin of victory with a Republican styled election.

Baseball teams don't try to get more hits to have more hits than the opposing team, they try to get more hits in hopes that they will get more runs and WIN, and that is how Trump played the game as well.

Of course he would have campaigned differently and he may have won the popular too. That's not the point. The point is, as you just admitted, we're not a democracy.

Duh....

There's that pre-K mentality of yours shining again.

Your baby babble is the reason why you were arguing with me in the first place.

I never said America was a democracy, I said that states have democratic elections(even for the 2 Senators now)that determine the electoral college votes from each state, and I also said that you were against democracy because you are a Democrat when they are against the democratic votes in the states for both the Democratic Party primaries and the general election.

Which is stupid since a) most primaries are not democratic in that not everyone can vote; and b) the general election is not democratic, so how on Earth does that make me anti-democracy? You don't have a clue what you're spouting.

If everyone could vote in the Democratic Party's primary it wouldn't be a Democratic Party primary, dipshit. Every eligible Democrat in a particular state being able to vote for their state's Democrat delegates is literally as democratic as you can get for a primary or caucus.
The general election has 51 democratic elections for electors that would be obliterated if we went to a popular vote.

Do you even understand what a democracy actually is?

 

[Faun]

There is nothing democratic about the democrat party.
And liberalism is.much more of.a.culr than consevstism. We dont need politics run our entire lives to live. We go to work and dont NEED to discuss politics every second.

Your opinion is noted but that has nothing to do with that @ptbW ridiculing democracy because he's too stupid to know the word, "democratism," is applicable to a system of government, not a political party.

You rightwing rubes crack me up!

True its the process of making an institutions more democratic. But what both know he meant the democrat party. Which is why I used liberal, although true liberalism is great, modern American liberalism is utterly horrible and to what I was referring.

Again, your opinion is noted. Who knows why you felt compelled to repeat it?

It's the only point s/h/it has.

No the left is too stupid to understand, doo i try to say it in a different way

Nah, you have to be a complete idiot to argue liberalism is horrible coming off an election where most people who voted, voted for a Liberal.

But again, that's your opinion and it was noted (and disgarded).

 

[buckeye45_73]

Your opinion is noted but that has nothing to do with that @ptbW ridiculing democracy because he's too stupid to know the word, "democratism," is applicable to a system of government, not a political party.

You rightwing rubes crack me up!

True its the process of making an institutions more democratic. But what both know he meant the democrat party. Which is why I used liberal, although true liberalism is great, modern American liberalism is utterly horrible and to what I was referring.

Again, your opinion is noted. Who knows why you felt compelled to repeat it?

It's the only point s/h/it has.

No the left is too stupid to understand, doo i try to say it in a different way

Nah, you have to be a complete idiot to argue liberalism is horrible coming off an election where most people who voted, voted for a Liberal.

But again, that's your opinion and it was noted (and disgarded).

Well you keep telling yourself that, you lost states.you havent lost in 30 to 40 years and ran up margine in CA and NY. Im fine with hour thinking, keep being crazy anti white, pro anything else party full of freakshow types.

 

[Faun]

Of course he would have campaigned differently and he may have won the popular too. That's not the point. The point is, as you just admitted, we're not a democracy.

Duh....

There's that pre-K mentality of yours shining again.

Your baby babble is the reason why you were arguing with me in the first place.

I never said America was a democracy, I said that states have democratic elections(even for the 2 Senators now)that determine the electoral college votes from each state, and I also said that you were against democracy because you are a Democrat when they are against the democratic votes in the states for both the Democratic Party primaries and the general election.

Which is stupid since a) most primaries are not democratic in that not everyone can vote; and b) the general election is not democratic, so how on Earth does that make me anti-democracy? You don't have a clue what you're spouting.

If everyone could vote in the Democratic Party's primary it wouldn't be a Democratic Party primary, dipshit. Every eligible Democrat in a particular state being able to vote for their state's Democrat delegates is literally as democratic as you can get for a primary or caucus.
The general election has 51 democratic elections for electors that would be obliterated if we went to a popular vote.

Do you even understand what a democracy actually is?

Democracy is where people have a voice in the government. Independents have no voice in primaries in most states.

 

[Faun]

True its the process of making an institutions more democratic. But what both know he meant the democrat party. Which is why I used liberal, although true liberalism is great, modern American liberalism is utterly horrible and to what I was referring.

Again, your opinion is noted. Who knows why you felt compelled to repeat it?

It's the only point s/h/it has.

No the left is too stupid to understand, doo i try to say it in a different way

Nah, you have to be a complete idiot to argue liberalism is horrible coming off an election where most people who voted, voted for a Liberal.

But again, that's your opinion and it was noted (and disgarded).

Well you keep telling yourself that, you lost states.you havent lost in 30 to 40 years and ran up margine in CA and NY. Im fine with hour thinking, keep being crazy anti white, pro anything else party full of freakshow types.

None of which has anything to do with what I said.

 

[owebo]

Duh....

There's that pre-K mentality of yours shining again.

Your baby babble is the reason why you were arguing with me in the first place.

I never said America was a democracy, I said that states have democratic elections(even for the 2 Senators now)that determine the electoral college votes from each state, and I also said that you were against democracy because you are a Democrat when they are against the democratic votes in the states for both the Democratic Party primaries and the general election.

Which is stupid since a) most primaries are not democratic in that not everyone can vote; and b) the general election is not democratic, so how on Earth does that make me anti-democracy? You don't have a clue what you're spouting.

If everyone could vote in the Democratic Party's primary it wouldn't be a Democratic Party primary, dipshit. Every eligible Democrat in a particular state being able to vote for their state's Democrat delegates is literally as democratic as you can get for a primary or caucus.
The general election has 51 democratic elections for electors that would be obliterated if we went to a popular vote.

Do you even understand what a democracy actually is?

Democracy is where people have a voice in the government. Independents have no voice in primaries in most states.

Good thing we are a republic....

 

[ptbw forever]

Duh....

There's that pre-K mentality of yours shining again.

Your baby babble is the reason why you were arguing with me in the first place.

I never said America was a democracy, I said that states have democratic elections(even for the 2 Senators now)that determine the electoral college votes from each state, and I also said that you were against democracy because you are a Democrat when they are against the democratic votes in the states for both the Democratic Party primaries and the general election.

Which is stupid since a) most primaries are not democratic in that not everyone can vote; and b) the general election is not democratic, so how on Earth does that make me anti-democracy? You don't have a clue what you're spouting.

If everyone could vote in the Democratic Party's primary it wouldn't be a Democratic Party primary, dipshit. Every eligible Democrat in a particular state being able to vote for their state's Democrat delegates is literally as democratic as you can get for a primary or caucus.
The general election has 51 democratic elections for electors that would be obliterated if we went to a popular vote.

Do you even understand what a democracy actually is?

Democracy is where people have a voice in the government. Independents have no voice in primaries in most states.

Independents are not Democrats or Republicans. Do you want registered Republicans to vote in Democrat primaries too? Do you want the same Independent voters to vote in BOTH primaries?