Wow

Again, your opinion is noted. Who knows why you felt compelled to repeat it? :dunno:

It's the only point s/h/it has.


No the left is too stupid to understand, doo i try to say it in a different way
Nah, you have to be a complete idiot to argue liberalism is horrible coming off an election where most people who voted, voted for a Liberal.

But again, that's your opinion and it was noted (and disgarded).

Well you keep telling yourself that, you lost states.you havent lost in 30 to 40 years and ran up margine in CA and NY. Im fine with hour thinking, keep being crazy anti white, pro anything else party full of freakshow types.
None of which has anything to do with what I said.
Are you retarded?

You moronically regarded the fabled national "popular vote" as a reason why "liberalism" is fine and buckeye correctly pointed out that New York and California having much higher turnouts than most of the red states is the cause.

Everything he said directly rebutted what you said.
 
It's the only point s/h/it has.


No the left is too stupid to understand, doo i try to say it in a different way
Nah, you have to be a complete idiot to argue liberalism is horrible coming off an election where most people who voted, voted for a Liberal.

But again, that's your opinion and it was noted (and disgarded).

Well you keep telling yourself that, you lost states.you havent lost in 30 to 40 years and ran up margine in CA and NY. Im fine with hour thinking, keep being crazy anti white, pro anything else party full of freakshow types.
None of which has anything to do with what I said.
Are you retarded?

You moronically regarded the fabled national "popular vote" as a reason why "liberalism" is fine and buckeye correctly pointed out that New York and California having much higher turnouts than most of the red states is the cause.

Everything he said directly rebutted what you said.
It matters not where Liberals are, they received the most votes. As it happened in this election, it didn't help win the presidency, but it's retarded to claim Liberalism is horrible when most voters voted for a Liberal.
 
No the left is too stupid to understand, doo i try to say it in a different way
Nah, you have to be a complete idiot to argue liberalism is horrible coming off an election where most people who voted, voted for a Liberal.

But again, that's your opinion and it was noted (and disgarded).

Well you keep telling yourself that, you lost states.you havent lost in 30 to 40 years and ran up margine in CA and NY. Im fine with hour thinking, keep being crazy anti white, pro anything else party full of freakshow types.
None of which has anything to do with what I said.
Are you retarded?

You moronically regarded the fabled national "popular vote" as a reason why "liberalism" is fine and buckeye correctly pointed out that New York and California having much higher turnouts than most of the red states is the cause.

Everything he said directly rebutted what you said.
It matters not where Liberals are, they received the most votes. As it happened in this election, it didn't help win the presidency, but it's retarded to claim Liberalism is horrible when most voters voted for a Liberal.
Insulated California block voters in California and in neighboring states are not representative of the country. The heartland and the rust belt and the South are far more ideologically diverse together than one huge and overpopulated state that is radically and irrationally Democrat.

California is also an extremely uneducated state for how influential they are in national elections.
 
No the left is too stupid to understand, doo i try to say it in a different way
Nah, you have to be a complete idiot to argue liberalism is horrible coming off an election where most people who voted, voted for a Liberal.

But again, that's your opinion and it was noted (and disgarded).

Well you keep telling yourself that, you lost states.you havent lost in 30 to 40 years and ran up margine in CA and NY. Im fine with hour thinking, keep being crazy anti white, pro anything else party full of freakshow types.
None of which has anything to do with what I said.
Are you retarded?

You moronically regarded the fabled national "popular vote" as a reason why "liberalism" is fine and buckeye correctly pointed out that New York and California having much higher turnouts than most of the red states is the cause.

Everything he said directly rebutted what you said.
It matters not where Liberals are, they received the most votes. As it happened in this election, it didn't help win the presidency, but it's retarded to claim Liberalism is horrible when most voters voted for a Liberal.


Its cool, you go with that, get crazier, protest more, cause more damage and mayhem, people love that.
You racking up numbers in a city, and well keep controlling the congress and state governments
 
Nah, you have to be a complete idiot to argue liberalism is horrible coming off an election where most people who voted, voted for a Liberal.

But again, that's your opinion and it was noted (and disgarded).

Well you keep telling yourself that, you lost states.you havent lost in 30 to 40 years and ran up margine in CA and NY. Im fine with hour thinking, keep being crazy anti white, pro anything else party full of freakshow types.
None of which has anything to do with what I said.
Are you retarded?

You moronically regarded the fabled national "popular vote" as a reason why "liberalism" is fine and buckeye correctly pointed out that New York and California having much higher turnouts than most of the red states is the cause.

Everything he said directly rebutted what you said.
It matters not where Liberals are, they received the most votes. As it happened in this election, it didn't help win the presidency, but it's retarded to claim Liberalism is horrible when most voters voted for a Liberal.
Insulated California block voters in California and in neighboring states are not representative of the country.
Who said they were?? :dunno:
 
Nah, you have to be a complete idiot to argue liberalism is horrible coming off an election where most people who voted, voted for a Liberal.

But again, that's your opinion and it was noted (and disgarded).

Well you keep telling yourself that, you lost states.you havent lost in 30 to 40 years and ran up margine in CA and NY. Im fine with hour thinking, keep being crazy anti white, pro anything else party full of freakshow types.
None of which has anything to do with what I said.
Are you retarded?

You moronically regarded the fabled national "popular vote" as a reason why "liberalism" is fine and buckeye correctly pointed out that New York and California having much higher turnouts than most of the red states is the cause.

Everything he said directly rebutted what you said.
It matters not where Liberals are, they received the most votes. As it happened in this election, it didn't help win the presidency, but it's retarded to claim Liberalism is horrible when most voters voted for a Liberal.


Its cool, you go with that, get crazier, protest more, cause more damage and mayhem, people love that.
You racking up numbers in a city, and well keep controlling the congress and state governments
Good luck with that. Control of the government is a pendulum, it always swings back.
 
Well you keep telling yourself that, you lost states.you havent lost in 30 to 40 years and ran up margine in CA and NY. Im fine with hour thinking, keep being crazy anti white, pro anything else party full of freakshow types.
None of which has anything to do with what I said.
Are you retarded?

You moronically regarded the fabled national "popular vote" as a reason why "liberalism" is fine and buckeye correctly pointed out that New York and California having much higher turnouts than most of the red states is the cause.

Everything he said directly rebutted what you said.
It matters not where Liberals are, they received the most votes. As it happened in this election, it didn't help win the presidency, but it's retarded to claim Liberalism is horrible when most voters voted for a Liberal.


Its cool, you go with that, get crazier, protest more, cause more damage and mayhem, people love that.
You racking up numbers in a city, and well keep controlling the congress and state governments
Good luck with that. Control of the government is a pendulum, it always swings back.


So is the economy, so we agree, up and down in general. Now that weve established that we can start making progress.
 
None of which has anything to do with what I said.
Are you retarded?

You moronically regarded the fabled national "popular vote" as a reason why "liberalism" is fine and buckeye correctly pointed out that New York and California having much higher turnouts than most of the red states is the cause.

Everything he said directly rebutted what you said.
It matters not where Liberals are, they received the most votes. As it happened in this election, it didn't help win the presidency, but it's retarded to claim Liberalism is horrible when most voters voted for a Liberal.


Its cool, you go with that, get crazier, protest more, cause more damage and mayhem, people love that.
You racking up numbers in a city, and well keep controlling the congress and state governments
Good luck with that. Control of the government is a pendulum, it always swings back.


So is the economy, so we agree, up and down in general. Now that weve established that we can start making progress.
Since every Republican president in U.S. history except the one in office only 6 months presided over a recession, it explains why the economic pendulum swings with the political pendulum.
 
People really do see what they want to see.


What is your point in posting that video?

That this honorable and admirable Marine was loyal to his family and country till the day of his death?

That is generally considered a 'fact of the public domain' as Marines are some tough and proud hombres.

So what is your point?
 
It's like the guy took every good and right thing of himself, and applied them to Twunt and Pence.
That's the root of conservatism. The hypnotic belief that all good is conservative and all bad is liberal; as opposed to evaluating the characteristics of whatever they're examining. They've convinced themselves that conservatism is a panacea to save the country from liberalism. Two examples are Reagan and Bush Jr. Both had a mixture of conservative and liberal policies; Reagan's presidency was a success while Bush's was a miserable failure. As a result, conservatives worship Reagan but claim Bush's failures were due to Liberalism.

Conservatism is a cult.


Actually wrong dingleberry. Alot of us saw the error of these unfettered trade deals. Again you projecting, the left, who are not tollerant and they are the ones who try to use brutte force ro.shut up people and any dissenters.
... shrieks a cult member. :dunno:

Exactly so.

Oh, the next few months (until Twunt gets impeached) are gonna be FUN!
Democratism is a cult.
Marxism is a brain dead cult of homicidal sociopaths.
 
Well you keep telling yourself that, you lost states.you havent lost in 30 to 40 years and ran up margine in CA and NY. Im fine with hour thinking, keep being crazy anti white, pro anything else party full of freakshow types.
None of which has anything to do with what I said.
Are you retarded?

You moronically regarded the fabled national "popular vote" as a reason why "liberalism" is fine and buckeye correctly pointed out that New York and California having much higher turnouts than most of the red states is the cause.

Everything he said directly rebutted what you said.
It matters not where Liberals are, they received the most votes. As it happened in this election, it didn't help win the presidency, but it's retarded to claim Liberalism is horrible when most voters voted for a Liberal.


Its cool, you go with that, get crazier, protest more, cause more damage and mayhem, people love that.
You racking up numbers in a city, and well keep controlling the congress and state governments
Good luck with that. Control of the government is a pendulum, it always swings back.
You don't represent a legitimate wing of politics anymore.
 
15th post
That's the root of conservatism. The hypnotic belief that all good is conservative and all bad is liberal; as opposed to evaluating the characteristics of whatever they're examining. They've convinced themselves that conservatism is a panacea to save the country from liberalism. Two examples are Reagan and Bush Jr. Both had a mixture of conservative and liberal policies; Reagan's presidency was a success while Bush's was a miserable failure. As a result, conservatives worship Reagan but claim Bush's failures were due to Liberalism.

Conservatism is a cult.


Actually wrong dingleberry. Alot of us saw the error of these unfettered trade deals. Again you projecting, the left, who are not tollerant and they are the ones who try to use brutte force ro.shut up people and any dissenters.
... shrieks a cult member. :dunno:

Exactly so.

Oh, the next few months (until Twunt gets impeached) are gonna be FUN!
Democratism is a cult.
Marxism is a brain dead cult of homicidal sociopaths.
Great, yet another, I know you are but what am I retort. Are there any righties here who have graduated beyond pre-K? Exactly how many more years do you need?
 
Good luck with that. Control of the government is a pendulum, it always swings back.
You don't represent a legitimate wing of politics anymore.

The political pendulum does always swing back, but sometimes that takes decades, as it did when the Democrats ascended under FDR, and sometimes the other party is no longer there to have that pendulum swing back to it as happened to the Whigs.
 
Actually wrong dingleberry. Alot of us saw the error of these unfettered trade deals. Again you projecting, the left, who are not tollerant and they are the ones who try to use brutte force ro.shut up people and any dissenters.
... shrieks a cult member. :dunno:

Exactly so.

Oh, the next few months (until Twunt gets impeached) are gonna be FUN!
Democratism is a cult.
Marxism is a brain dead cult of homicidal sociopaths.
Great, yet another, I know you are but what am I retort. Are there any righties here who have graduated beyond pre-K? Exactly how many more years do you need?


I have an IT degree, I thought we discussed this.
 
Great, yet another, I know you are but what am I retort. Are there any righties here who have graduated beyond pre-K? Exactly how many more years do you need?
I have an IT degree, I thought we discussed this.
I'm sorry, Buckeye, but Faun is too busy extracting his head from his colon to bother reading that response.
 
Back
Top Bottom