- Nov 14, 2011
- 120,766
- 65,443
- 2,635
LOLOLOLLOLFake News bots like you need fresh air.Lying con. His letter says no such thing.NOPE.....he said in his letter to BARR.....that even without that rule he wouldn't have recommended it.
The link is in the top post for a reason dude.
JO
http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2019/images/05/01/letter.32719.pdf
They are not going to be able to cope ith
anything less than overturning 2016.
Jo
Slobbers the con who posted a quote from Mueller's letter to Barr that's not actually in there.
It's not up to me to teach you how to read:
Mueller's report concluded that there was insufficient evidence to show a criminal conspiracy. Mueller opted not to make a conclusion on whether Trump committed obstruction of justice, but pointedly did not exonerate him. Barr has said he and Rosenstein then determined based on Mueller's findings that there was insufficient evidence to establish that the president had committed criminal obstruction
Here's the big one:
A Justice Department legal opinion says sitting presidents cannot be indicted. Barr says Mueller told him he wouldn't have recommended indicting the president even without that opinion from the Office of Legal Counsel
Read Newsmax: Barr: I Was Surprised by Mueller Decision
And to convince me your attribution really is in the Mueller report, you're going to quote a rightard website and not Mueller's report?