Opinion---The TWO main questions that Mueller MUST answer under oath.....

[nat4900]

First:

"Mr. Mueller, as an experienced and renowned prosecutor, and based on your thorough report, would the evidence on obstruction of justice be enough to indict ANYONE if that individual were not the sitting president and shielded by the current DOJ policy?....................................Yes or No?

Second:

"Mr. Mueller, as a respect American citizen, would you conclude, based on your report, that although the evidence was "insufficient" to conclude that the Trump campaign colluded with Russian operatives, that the behavior of the Trump campaign was highly unethical and unpatriotic in their relationship with these operatives from a hostile, foreign country?...............................................Yes or No?

 

[Thinker101]

First:

"Mr. Mueller, as an experienced and renowned prosecutor, and based on your thorough report, would the evidence on obstruction of justice be enough to indict ANYONE if that individual were not the sitting president and shielded by the current DOJ policy?....................................Yes or No?

Second:

"Mr. Mueller, as a respect American citizen, would you conclude, based on your report, that although the evidence was "insufficient" to conclude that the Trump campaign colluded with Russian operatives, that the behavior of the Trump campaign was highly unethical and unpatriotic in their relationship with these operatives from a hostile, foreign country?...............................................Yes or No?

Ok, so you're going for impeachment based on unethical and/or unpatriotic behavior?

 

[Claudette]

LMFAO

 

[CrusaderFrank]

First:

"Mr. Mueller, as an experienced and renowned prosecutor, and based on your thorough report, would the evidence on obstruction of justice be enough to indict ANYONE if that individual were not the sitting president and shielded by the current DOJ policy?....................................Yes or No?

Second:

"Mr. Mueller, as a respect American citizen, would you conclude, based on your report, that although the evidence was "insufficient" to conclude that the Trump campaign colluded with Russian operatives, that the behavior of the Trump campaign was highly unethical and unpatriotic in their relationship with these operatives from a hostile, foreign country?...............................................Yes or No?

Mr. Starkey, what part of "No Collusion" escapes you?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Ok, so you're going for impeachment based on unethical and/or unpatriotic behavior?

Actually, obstruction is criminal behavior.

 

[Edgetho]

 

[Sunni Man]

.
Face it nitwit.

There wasn't any Russian collusion.

................

 

[Thinker101]

Ok, so you're going for impeachment based on unethical and/or unpatriotic behavior?

Actually, obstruction is criminal behavior.

So impeachment is back on the table? You fricken loons make it so confusing.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So impeachment is back on the table?

I don't know. Doubtful. Compelling information can play in the next election without any impeachment process.

The democrats would be fools not to bring in mueller for questioning, given his misgivings about the trump stooge.

 

[nat4900]

Ok, so you're going for impeachment based on unethical and/or unpatriotic behavior?

THAT is YOUR "moronic" conclusion about impeachment......However, it very much sounds that sycophants like you now find ACCEPTABLE unethical and unpatriotic behavior by any president......

 

[nat4900]

LMFAO

Great response.......You should now go rest after taxing your half brain so much.

(do these Trump ass kissing idiots breed more idiots?)

 

[nat4900]

So impeachment is back on the table? You fricken loons make it so confusing.

Where the **** do morons like you find the term "impeachment" in my post??

 

[Claudette]

LMFAO

Great response.......You should now go rest after taxing your half brain so much.

(do these Trump ass kissing idiots breed more idiots?)

Its the only response I could think of for your idiotic post.

You are good for a laugh.

 

[Thinker101]

Ok, so you're going for impeachment based on unethical and/or unpatriotic behavior?

THAT is YOUR "moronic" conclusion about impeachment......However, it very much sounds that sycophants like you now find ACCEPTABLE unethical and unpatriotic behavior by any president......

You may want to go back and ready your own question, number 2....dumbass.

 

[forkup]

First:

"Mr. Mueller, as an experienced and renowned prosecutor, and based on your thorough report, would the evidence on obstruction of justice be enough to indict ANYONE if that individual were not the sitting president and shielded by the current DOJ policy?....................................Yes or No?

Second:

"Mr. Mueller, as a respect American citizen, would you conclude, based on your report, that although the evidence was "insufficient" to conclude that the Trump campaign colluded with Russian operatives, that the behavior of the Trump campaign was highly unethical and unpatriotic in their relationship with these operatives from a hostile, foreign country?...............................................Yes or No?

The first question is a good one.
The second one isn't. First because it's a leading question and because it asks a prosecutor to make a judgement on a subjective question.

 

[Thinker101]

So impeachment is back on the table? You fricken loons make it so confusing.

Where the **** do morons like you find the term "impeachment" in my post??

I was under the impression impeachment was always the objective. So now it's just piss and moan?

 

[Oddball]

First:

"Mr. Mueller, as an experienced and renowned prosecutor, and based on your thorough report, would the evidence on obstruction of justice be enough to indict ANYONE if that individual were not the sitting president and shielded by the current DOJ policy?....................................Yes or No?

Second:

"Mr. Mueller, as a respect American citizen, would you conclude, based on your report, that although the evidence was "insufficient" to conclude that the Trump campaign colluded with Russian operatives, that the behavior of the Trump campaign was highly unethical and unpatriotic in their relationship with these operatives from a hostile, foreign country?...............................................Yes or No?

 

[JoeMoma]

So impeachment is back on the table? You fricken loons make it so confusing.

Where the **** do morons like you find the term "impeachment" in my post??

Well "indictment" means that there must of been a high crime or misdemeanor -- grounds for impeachment for a sitting president.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

was under the impression impeachment was always the objective.

Well, it isn't. Getting trump out of office is the objective.

 

[JoeMoma]

Mr. Mueller, as a respect American citizen, would you conclude, based on your report, that although the evidence was "insufficient" to conclude that the Trump campaign colluded with Russian operatives, that the behavior of the Trump campaign was highly unethical and unpatriotic in their relationship with these operatives from a hostile, foreign country?...............................................Yes or No?

It is not Mueller's role as special counsel to make that determination.