Opinion---The TWO main questions that Mueller MUST answer under oath.....

nat4900

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2015
42,021
5,964
1,870
First:

"Mr. Mueller, as an experienced and renowned prosecutor, and based on your thorough report, would the evidence on obstruction of justice be enough to indict ANYONE if that individual were not the sitting president and shielded by the current DOJ policy?....................................Yes or No?

Second:

"Mr. Mueller, as a respect American citizen, would you conclude, based on your report, that although the evidence was "insufficient" to conclude that the Trump campaign colluded with Russian operatives, that the behavior of the Trump campaign was highly unethical and unpatriotic in their relationship with these operatives from a hostile, foreign country?...............................................Yes or No?
 
First:

"Mr. Mueller, as an experienced and renowned prosecutor, and based on your thorough report, would the evidence on obstruction of justice be enough to indict ANYONE if that individual were not the sitting president and shielded by the current DOJ policy?....................................Yes or No?

Second:

"Mr. Mueller, as a respect American citizen, would you conclude, based on your report, that although the evidence was "insufficient" to conclude that the Trump campaign colluded with Russian operatives, that the behavior of the Trump campaign was highly unethical and unpatriotic in their relationship with these operatives from a hostile, foreign country?...............................................Yes or No?

Ok, so you're going for impeachment based on unethical and/or unpatriotic behavior?
 
First:

"Mr. Mueller, as an experienced and renowned prosecutor, and based on your thorough report, would the evidence on obstruction of justice be enough to indict ANYONE if that individual were not the sitting president and shielded by the current DOJ policy?....................................Yes or No?

Second:

"Mr. Mueller, as a respect American citizen, would you conclude, based on your report, that although the evidence was "insufficient" to conclude that the Trump campaign colluded with Russian operatives, that the behavior of the Trump campaign was highly unethical and unpatriotic in their relationship with these operatives from a hostile, foreign country?...............................................Yes or No?

Mr. Starkey, what part of "No Collusion" escapes you?
 
image-20161005-15882-13x0gd1.jpg
 
So impeachment is back on the table?
I don't know. Doubtful. Compelling information can play in the next election without any impeachment process.

The democrats would be fools not to bring in mueller for questioning, given his misgivings about the trump stooge.
 
Last edited:
Ok, so you're going for impeachment based on unethical and/or unpatriotic behavior?

THAT is YOUR "moronic" conclusion about impeachment......However, it very much sounds that sycophants like you now find ACCEPTABLE unethical and unpatriotic behavior by any president......
 
Ok, so you're going for impeachment based on unethical and/or unpatriotic behavior?

THAT is YOUR "moronic" conclusion about impeachment......However, it very much sounds that sycophants like you now find ACCEPTABLE unethical and unpatriotic behavior by any president......

You may want to go back and ready your own question, number 2....dumbass.
 
First:

"Mr. Mueller, as an experienced and renowned prosecutor, and based on your thorough report, would the evidence on obstruction of justice be enough to indict ANYONE if that individual were not the sitting president and shielded by the current DOJ policy?....................................Yes or No?

Second:

"Mr. Mueller, as a respect American citizen, would you conclude, based on your report, that although the evidence was "insufficient" to conclude that the Trump campaign colluded with Russian operatives, that the behavior of the Trump campaign was highly unethical and unpatriotic in their relationship with these operatives from a hostile, foreign country?...............................................Yes or No?
The first question is a good one.
The second one isn't. First because it's a leading question and because it asks a prosecutor to make a judgement on a subjective question.
 
First:

"Mr. Mueller, as an experienced and renowned prosecutor, and based on your thorough report, would the evidence on obstruction of justice be enough to indict ANYONE if that individual were not the sitting president and shielded by the current DOJ policy?....................................Yes or No?

Second:

"Mr. Mueller, as a respect American citizen, would you conclude, based on your report, that although the evidence was "insufficient" to conclude that the Trump campaign colluded with Russian operatives, that the behavior of the Trump campaign was highly unethical and unpatriotic in their relationship with these operatives from a hostile, foreign country?...............................................Yes or No?

AnyDay3.jpeg
 
Mr. Mueller, as a respect American citizen, would you conclude, based on your report, that although the evidence was "insufficient" to conclude that the Trump campaign colluded with Russian operatives, that the behavior of the Trump campaign was highly unethical and unpatriotic in their relationship with these operatives from a hostile, foreign country?...............................................Yes or No?

It is not Mueller's role as special counsel to make that determination.
 

Forum List

Back
Top