Would You Support War With Syria?

[zonly1]

No thanks.

I'll stick to facts, and away from your idiotic connections between China, CitiCorp stock, Times-Warner, and Bugs Bunny.

What facts are those? BRIC coalition is not dealing with the dollar/petro dollar . By the time you wake up the calamity, you'll need basic necessities. You know what, it doesn't effect you so fauk it and call me names. When you've figure the game out, it will be too late. keep barring your head in the sand is a great solution. We are in a war scenrio but don't let that bother, call me names, micro stock market watchers are guppies.

The facts like,

A. we cannot afford a war while we are at $19 Trillion in Debt.
B. Syriah is no threat to the USA

With these two basic facts, it is unnecessary for me to conjure an imaginary scenario, then accuse anyone who cannot buy into my absurd notions of "burying their head in the sand."

But please, don't let any opportunity pass to mention US banks and their relationship to the price of tea in China: Your OCD is hilarious.

the dollar is in a corner it can't get out of, furthermore, big economies such as russia and china are by passing the dollar along with the bric pack alliance. where were you when this has taken place. If your so worried about big banks, you can research rothchild, bilderberg, etc.

when the dollar looses global currency status...you can't get cheap interest..b/c it was facilitated by CRA and socialism for ones own personal prestige of power and in so doing created cycles of boom and bearish condition to favor control.

 

[zonly1]

There are some horrible things going on in Syria no doubt about that but us getting involved won't fix it, this is a Syrian problem let them work it out. There are things going on in Africa that make Syria look like a picnic but we won't go there.

Yeah, there is no doubt horrible things are going on. But our MSM uses that to garner support for more American War intervention. They're very devious that way. They work for the War Mongering Globalists in the end. It's their job to promote more Foreign Intervention. I'm always very wary of their reports of 'Massacres' and such. It's hard to believe them these days. They have an agenda. It is what it is.

Us getting involved in Syria will just make things 10 times worse, it will be the same routine when we first go in people will glad to see us but after the first clips on tv of innocent Syrians killed by American air strikes and drone attacks get seen, we will be hated and everything will be blamed on us, no thank you I have seen this movie before.

we should have use the patton doctrine at time but you're and after thought

 

[paulitician]

Looks like War with Syria is inevitable. This Administration is beating those War Drums harder & harder everyday. Stay tuned.

 

[candycorn]

Funny how things change.

 

[candycorn]

I do NOT support boots on the ground in Syria. Also I do NOT support Obama's leadership.

Few ever supported it back in the day. Now those same people are calling Obama not going into Syria an act of cowardice or whatever.

 

[Supreme Allied Condista]

As the War Drums beat louder & louder, it appears War with Syria is inevitable. How do you feel about our involvement in it. Will you support it?

"Syria" is a war-zone, not a single country any more. So one can't make war "with" Syria, merely make war in Syria, against, or in defence of, one or more of the Syrian factions.

I will support waging war in Syria under the leadership of Condoleezza Rice, as explained in this thread in the military forum.

Condi Rice vs ISIS. Condista battleplan, strategy, fan video. | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[paulitician]

As the War Drums beat louder & louder, it appears War with Syria is inevitable. How do you feel about our involvement in it. Will you support it?

"Syria" is a war-zone, not a single country any more. So one can't make war "with" Syria, merely make war in Syria, against, or in defence of, one or more of the Syrian factions.

I will support waging war in Syria under the leadership of Condoleezza Rice, as explained in this thread in the military forum.

Condi Rice vs ISIS. Condista battleplan, strategy, fan video. | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This poll was conducted a couple years ago. I told everyone then, that war with Syria was inevitable. Our Government planned it a long time ago. It failed on its chemical weapons scam, but it got its war eventually.

 

[Supreme Allied Condista]

U.S. Urges Turkey to Seal Border / Remind Turkey's leaders of their NATO treaty obligations

Condi Rice vs ISIS. Condista battleplan, strategy, fan video. | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[Delta4Embassy]

As the War Drums beat louder & louder, it appears War with Syria is inevitable. How do you feel about our involvement in it. Will you support it?

US vs Syria proper? No.

Judging by piss-poor performance lately, and given Syria's not the pushovers Iraq and Afganistan shoulda been, we'd lose bloody against Syria, Iran, etc. not just 'not win.'

Gotta get the Oval Office out of military decisions. I'm sure when George Washington was being considered for the Presidency his military record and performance played into their thinking. But I doubt they thought it liekly the Commander-In-Chief would ever be a non-military officer or one of very low non-command rank.

President's military authority should be limited by law to "Begin the war." and "End the war." But military decisions should be left to the military.

 

[paulitician]

As the War Drums beat louder & louder, it appears War with Syria is inevitable. How do you feel about our involvement in it. Will you support it?

US vs Syria proper? No.

Judging by piss-poor performance lately, and given Syria's not the pushovers Iraq and Afganistan shoulda been, we'd lose bloody against Syria, Iran, etc. not just 'not win.'

Gotta get the Oval Office out of military decisions. I'm sure when George Washington was being considered for the Presidency his military record and performance played into their thinking. But I doubt they thought it liekly the Commander-In-Chief would ever be a non-military officer or one of very low non-command rank.

President's military authority should be limited by law to "Begin the war." and "End the war." But military decisions should be left to the military.

If you take this same poll today, most Americans will be onboard with war in Syria. The 'Permanent War' Globalist Elites know how to get their wars. War with Syria was inevitable. It was planned years ago.

Their chemical weapons scam didn't work. Most didn't buy it. But fighting another Terrorist Boogeyman will do. They got their war in the end.

 

[irosie91]

As the War Drums beat louder & louder, it appears War with Syria is inevitable. How do you feel about our involvement in it. Will you support it?

US vs Syria proper? No.

Judging by piss-poor performance lately, and given Syria's not the pushovers Iraq and Afganistan shoulda been, we'd lose bloody against Syria, Iran, etc. not just 'not win.'

Gotta get the Oval Office out of military decisions. I'm sure when George Washington was being considered for the Presidency his military record and performance played into their thinking. But I doubt they thought it liekly the Commander-In-Chief would ever be a non-military officer or one of very low non-command rank.

President's military authority should be limited by law to "Begin the war." and "End the war." But military decisions should be left to the military.

If you take this same poll today, most Americans will be onboard with war in Syria. The 'Permanent War' Globalist Elites know how to get their wars. War with Syria was inevitable. It was planned years ago.

Their chemical weapons scam didn't work. Most didn't buy it. But fighting another Terrorist Boogeyman will do. They got their war in the end.

how long ago was it planned and by whom and why?