Would the world be more morally governed if it were run by women?

Would the world be more morally governed if it were run by women?

  • Yes, more moral

    Votes: 1 5.6%
  • No, less moral

    Votes: 5 27.8%
  • No change, it'd be the same

    Votes: 12 66.7%

  • Total voters
    18

Dr.Drock

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
9,680
Reaction score
949
Points
48
Not much more besides the thread title, but more morally governed by woman rather than how it's currently run by almost all men?
 
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
14,201
Reaction score
3,563
Points
185
Women fight with a more "take no prisoners" attitude. It is more personal and there is no end, no truce.
 
OP
D

Dr.Drock

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
9,680
Reaction score
949
Points
48
See I disagree, I think it'd be better. We men have egos, and that most certainly goes into how the world's governors make their decisions. Not that women don't have egos, but not usually on the level of men.


Plus they have a more natural nurturing instinct as mothers, for instance it seems more likely for a woman to love her children than a man.
 

High_Gravity

Belligerent Drunk
Joined
Nov 19, 2010
Messages
40,159
Reaction score
7,084
Points
260
Location
Richmond VA
See I disagree, I think it'd be better. We men have egos, and that most certainly goes into how the world's governors make their decisions. Not that women don't have egos, but not usually on the level of men.


Plus they have a more natural nurturing instinct as mothers, for instance it seems more likely for a woman to love her children than a man.
It might be better in some ways but worse in others, you said women are more nurturing than men, you are correct so that could mean we would be pumping even more money into countries in Africa like Somalia and fighting wars in countries like the Congo where women are raped in record levels.
 

PLYMCO_PILGRIM

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2009
Messages
17,416
Reaction score
3,063
Points
183
Location
America's Home Town
See I disagree, I think it'd be better. We men have egos, and that most certainly goes into how the world's governors make their decisions. Not that women don't have egos, but not usually on the level of men.


Plus they have a more natural nurturing instinct as mothers, for instance it seems more likely for a woman to love her children than a man.
It might be better in some ways but worse in others, you said women are more nurturing than men, you are correct so that could mean we would be pumping even more money into countries in Africa like Somalia and fighting wars in countries like the Congo where women are raped in record levels.
It would be different but, in the end, i dont think it would be any more or less moral.

Like you say, women and men are differnet on some subjects but in the end both are human.
 
OP
D

Dr.Drock

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
9,680
Reaction score
949
Points
48
See I disagree, I think it'd be better. We men have egos, and that most certainly goes into how the world's governors make their decisions. Not that women don't have egos, but not usually on the level of men.


Plus they have a more natural nurturing instinct as mothers, for instance it seems more likely for a woman to love her children than a man.
It might be better in some ways but worse in others, you said women are more nurturing than men, you are correct so that could mean we would be pumping even more money into countries in Africa like Somalia and fighting wars in countries like the Congo where women are raped in record levels.
But maybe that war in Africa isn't going on, but you make good points.

As do you Plymco.

There is no wrong answer to this question as we're all just making guesses on a never to happen hypothetical, just sounded like an interesting topic to ponder.
 

Mad Scientist

Feels Good!
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
24,196
Reaction score
5,424
Points
270
Women fight with a more "take no prisoners" attitude. It is more personal and there is no end, no truce.
Wimmen would nuke each others countries for the dumbest things like one girl wearing the same dress as them or daring to look at their Man.

Bitch!
 

Avatar4321

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2004
Messages
82,283
Reaction score
10,122
Points
2,070
Location
Minnesota
Hate to break it to you, but women already do rule the world.
 

Quantum Windbag

Gold Member
Joined
May 9, 2010
Messages
58,308
Reaction score
5,091
Points
245
See I disagree, I think it'd be better. We men have egos, and that most certainly goes into how the world's governors make their decisions. Not that women don't have egos, but not usually on the level of men.


Plus they have a more natural nurturing instinct as mothers, for instance it seems more likely for a woman to love her children than a man.
Wow.

That is so far off base I have no idea where to begin.

Ever hear of the praying mantis?
 

Lokiate

Super Beast
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
452
Reaction score
66
Points
28
Location
Slipping into the twilight zone
Not much more besides the thread title, but more morally governed by woman rather than how it's currently run by almost all men?
Fuck no, women can vicious, cruel, underhanded, and criminal in nature too.

Ever hear of Mary I (Bloody Mary) Lady Bathory, Margret Thatcher, Catherine II, Elizabeth I, and Queen Isabella?
 
Last edited:

NGSamson

Active Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
755
Reaction score
69
Points
28
Location
South Texas.
See I disagree, I think it'd be better. We men have egos, and that most certainly goes into how the world's governors make their decisions. Not that women don't have egos, but not usually on the level of men.


Plus they have a more natural nurturing instinct as mothers, for instance it seems more likely for a woman to love her children than a man.
It might be better in some ways but worse in others, you said women are more nurturing than men, you are correct so that could mean we would be pumping even more money into countries in Africa like Somalia and fighting wars in countries like the Congo where women are raped in record levels.
I would go for that.
 

Youwerecreated

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
13,273
Reaction score
164
Points
83
Not much more besides the thread title, but more morally governed by woman rather than how it's currently run by almost all men?
Remember cleopatra.

Can you imagine women suffering from hot flashes in control of nuclear bombs :lol:

Screwing with Gods chain of command has consequences.
 
OP
D

Dr.Drock

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
9,680
Reaction score
949
Points
48
Not much more besides the thread title, but more morally governed by woman rather than how it's currently run by almost all men?
Remember cleopatra.

Can you imagine women suffering from hot flashes in control of nuclear bombs :lol:

Screwing with Gods chain of command has consequences.
Gods chain of command?



Oh boy....................................




:cuckoo:
 

Marie888

† † †
Joined
Sep 28, 2010
Messages
954
Reaction score
229
Points
78
Location
Temporarily on earth †
I don't believe it would be. I tend to believe then men make better leaders than women, and that men are naturally made to be the leaders.

For instance, there are Kings and Queens, and most of the time the King's Title is in authority over the Queen. Even with our own Presidents. That doesn't make one or the other less or more moral or more or less important - just different roles. Both are equally important, just different.

I also believe it all starts at home and of course has to do with our relationship with the Lord - it's all spiritual. Men, Biblically speaking, are made up to be the leaders for the most part. (It's a wonder why we have so many problems in the home today; and no, I'm not saying I haven't made mistakes, because I have in that regard.)

But from my understanding, men would prefer to be respected first, and then yes of course "loved." The position of respect and leadership and the wife standing by him, even when he messes up, is one of importance. And he will mess up, as we all do. Harder done than said, but when done, really helps a ton of messes I think.

These verses in the Bible amazed me when I first read them. They seemed to fit perfectly and also made sense of why we have so many family problems today. And again, I think it all begins with family and moreso our relationship with the Lord and learning from Him first what to do.

Ephesians 5

22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.

23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.

24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing
.

Another verse in the Bible... kinda funny, but also is true:

Proverbs 25:24 It is better to dwell in the corner of the housetop, than with a brawling woman and in a wide house.

I guess overall I think part of our decline has to do with the disrespect we (not all ppl, but many) can possibly to give the opposite sex. It's what Satan wants. If he can break up the family unit all over the place, it just trickles down and around and all over into other relationships, and leaderships, etc. Just my thoughts, but learning as I go.


.
 
Last edited:

Avatar4321

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2004
Messages
82,283
Reaction score
10,122
Points
2,070
Location
Minnesota
If you world to be more morally governed, then you need to learn to morally govern yourself and teach others to do likewise.

Then the world's problems will take care of themselves.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top