Zone1 Would Jesus support Donald Trump if alive today?

No. I deny your perverted and obscene assumption that God who is incorporeal has the carnal concerns of a kid heavy into puberty. Or a lecherous and perverted old fart.
Didn't you say you show your love of God by following his commands? Why won't you follow God's commands against improper sexual relations?
 
If you deny God gave those commands, then who do you believe did give these commands?

6 None of you shall approach a close to have sexual intercourse. I am the LORD.

7* You shall not disgrace your father by having intercourse with your mother.c She is your own mother; you shall not have intercourse with her.

8You shall not have intercourse with your father’s wife, for that would be a disgrace to your father.

9You shall not have intercourse with your sister,* d your father’s daughter or your mother’s daughter, whether she was born in your own household or born elsewhere.

10You shall not have intercourse with your son’s daughter or with your daughter’s daughter,* for that would be a disgrace to you.

11You shall not have intercourse with the daughter whom your father’s wife bore to him in his household,e since she, too, is your sister.

12You shall not have intercourse with your father’s sister,f since she is your father’s relative.

13You shall not have intercourse with your mother’s sister, since she is your mother’s relative.

14You shall not disgrace your father’s brother by having sexual relations with his wife,g since she, too, is your aunt.

15You shall not have intercourse with your daughter-in-law;* h she is your son’s wife; you shall not have intercourse with her.

16You shall not have intercourse with your brother’s wife;* i that would be a disgrace to your brother.

17You shall not have intercourse with a woman and also with her daughter, nor shall you marry and have intercourse with her son’s daughter or her daughter’s daughter;j they are related to her. This would be shameful.

18While your wife is still living you shall not marry her sister as her rival and have intercourse with her.k

19You shall not approach a woman to have intercourse with her while she is in her menstrual uncleanness.l

20You shall not have sexual relations with your neighbor’s wife,* m defiling yourself with her.

21n You shall not offer any of your offspring for immolation to Molech,* thus profaning the name of your God. I am the LORD.

22You shall not lie with a male as with a woman;o such a thing is an abomination.

23You shall not have sexual relations with an animal, defiling yourself with it; nor shall a woman set herself in front of an animal to mate with it; that is perverse.p
And this is where it's going to get a little crazy, as he continues to deny any of the Bible is to be taken literally.
 
Didn't you say you show your love of God by following his commands? Why won't you follow God's commands against improper sexual relations?
He follows the commands he imagines that God gives, commands he writes himself to conform to his made up gospel.
 
If you deny God gave those commands, then who do you believe did give these commands?
Like I said these laws were written over a period of a thousand years reflecting the contemporary concerns of unknown authors long after Moses died and were not from God.

The people had already turned aside from THE WAY Moses taught to follow the Law.
 
Like I said these laws were written over a period of a thousand years reflecting the contemporary concerns of unknown authors long after Moses died and were not from God.

The people had already turned aside from THE WAY Moses taught to follow the Law.
So you believe these laws were made up by men and aren't from God at all?
 
Didn't you say you show your love of God by following his commands? Why won't you follow God's commands against improper sexual relations?
I don't need laws to not engage in improper sexual relations. If I said it again would it help?
 
So you believe these laws were made up by men and aren't from God at all?
Ta da!

God would have to be more fucked up than a psychiatric patient in a mental hospital for the criminally insane to write laws regulating diet fashion and the sexual preferences of consenting adult bipeds.

That may be your God but its not and never was my God.

What do you think Jesus meant by denouncing "the traditions of men" because they rendered the Law null and void?
 
I don't need laws to not engage in improper sexual relations. If I said it again would it help?
The issue is your refusal to acknowledge these are commands against having improper sexual relations.

The fact that these commands were recorded indicate that at that time they did need to have these commands because people were having improper sexual relations and they still are today. So clearly these commands are still needed.
 
Ta da!

God would have to be more fucked up than a psychiatric patient in a mental hospital for the criminally insane to write laws regulating diet fashion and the sexual preferences of consenting adult bipeds.

That may be your God but its not and never was my God.

What do you think Jesus meant by denouncing "the traditions of men" because they rendered the Law null and void?
I think you have just admitted to being a fake all this time.

Do you believe God cares if we have improper sexual relations as listed in the 18 commands in Leviticus 18?
 
The issue is your refusal to acknowledge these are commands against having improper sexual relations.
No the issue is that if scripture is true you died and descended into hell in the same day you first set aside the Law of my God to seek spiritual life from bread made by human hands.

You really should stop obsessing over other peoples sex lives and try to figure out how to get out of the hell you are already in.

As scripture says about you, "the dead know nothing", much less the will of my God.
 
No the issue is that if scripture is true you died and descended into hell in the same day you first set aside the Law of my God to seek spiritual life from bread made by human hands.

You really should stop obsessing over other peoples sex lives and try to figure out how to get out of the hell you are already in.
No, the issue is your dishonesty.
 
No, the issue is your dishonesty.
Says the honest guy, :auiqs.jpg:, who thinks he will avoid the penalty, death, for the sin of idolatry by practicing idolatry and misleading others to do the same which amounts to murder.

Brilliant!
 
Says the guy who thinks he will avoid the penalty, death, for the sin of idolatry by practicing idolatry.

Brilliant!
Says the guy who said his God doesn't care if men butt **** other men or **** their mothers.

 
15th post
Ta da!

God would have to be more fucked up than a psychiatric patient in a mental hospital for the criminally insane to write laws regulating diet fashion and the sexual preferences of consenting adult bipeds.

That may be your God but its not and never was my God.

What do you think Jesus meant by denouncing "the traditions of men" because they rendered the Law null and void?
What are God's laws, since you reject the ones clearly written in His Word and reject the commands of His Son?
 
Says the guy who said his God doesn't care if men butt **** other men or **** their mothers.
Let me ask you this, if there was no sexual prohibitions added to the Law would you have had a very hard time refraining from man ass or had a hard time not ******* your mommy?
 
Let me ask you this, if there was no sexual prohibitions added to the Law would you have had a very hard time refraining from man ass or had a hard time not ******* your mommy?
According to you that is perfectly fine. So apparently you wouldn't.
 
What are God's laws, since you reject the ones clearly written in His Word and reject the commands of His Son?
What a great question. He says he shows his love for God by following God's commands but every command I brought up he rejected. He says those are just commands of men. So that's a great question.
 
Back
Top Bottom