Would free vasectomies be a better option than fighting about abortions?

Would free reversible vasectomies at age 16 be a good way of reducing unwanted pregnancies?

  • Yes, the State or Fed government should off free vasectomies

    Votes: 4 66.7%
  • No, vasectomies should be paid for by the individuals

    Votes: 2 33.3%

  • Total voters
    6
Vasectomys are much simpler than having a woman's tubes tied.
Vasectomys are also much cheaper than welfare & Medicaid plus all the other expenses.

It's the part about thinking they're easily reversed.
 
No voting?

One more way for Republicans to disenfranchise folks huh?


If someone is on Welfare and EBT benefits, they don't have any skin in the game.

Of course they shouldn't vote. He who pays the piper should get to call the tune.
 
Vasectomies are very minor surgeries.
Would it be in the Federal or State governments' interest to offer free "reversible" vasectomies?
If later in life if wanted, the vasectomy could be reversed.


Make the vasectomy free only for those who feel they are entitled to reparations.
 
No one’s right to vote was taken away by mask mandates or vaccines. You don’t need a mask or vaccine to vote absentee
No one's vote is in danger from a vasectomy "mandate", he was poking fun at vax & mask mandates.
No one can be forced to have a vasectomy.
It sounds like a good option for Medicaid or Welfare or some other department who deals with the unwanted pregnancies.

If a guy wants to be a parent and have his pay taken for child support, that's his decision. A vasectomy sounds like a good option for a young sexually active guy. It can't hurt his popularity.
 

Forum List

Back
Top