World Gates Organization (WHO) Will Override US Sovereignty in Any WHO-Declared "Health Crisis," Could Order Lockdowns

munkle

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2012
5,202
8,927
2,130

"A bill to stop US funding of the World Health Organization, which is presently considering changes, proposed by the Biden administration. which would cede US sovereignty on health policy, has gained 24 co-sponsors in nine days.

One of the many controversial changes proposed by Biden would relieve the UN organization of the requirement to consult and verify with the US before declaring a pandemic on US soil. One of the many changes is on page six of the official proposed changes “Provisional agenda item 16.2,” the presently existing words are removed:

“Before taking any action based on such reports, WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 10.”

The removal of this language would allow WHO to declare a pandemic on US soil without consulting the US, and taking further measures. The WHO is an agency of the UN which was created by international treaty which carries the force of law. The WHO states of its “IHR,” International Health Regulations:

“This binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007.”

The WHO is widely known to be a creature of billionaire Bill Gates, who contributes about $900 million per year to the UN organization, if Gates controlled GAVI is included. This makes Gates the single largest donor to WHO, surpassing even the US. See: “Bill Gates’ W.H.O. Power-Play Will Give Him US Sovereignty #StopTheTreaty

HR 419 Action Page by Association of American Physicians and Surgeons "


1653349402768.png



Funding contributions over GAVI’s 20-year life (source)

 

"A bill to stop US funding of the World Health Organization, which is presently considering changes, proposed by the Biden administration. which would cede US sovereignty on health policy, has gained 24 co-sponsors in nine days.

One of the many controversial changes proposed by Biden would relieve the UN organization of the requirement to consult and verify with the US before declaring a pandemic on US soil. One of the many changes is on page six of the official proposed changes “Provisional agenda item 16.2,” the presently existing words are removed:

“Before taking any action based on such reports, WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 10.”

The removal of this language would allow WHO to declare a pandemic on US soil without consulting the US, and taking further measures. The WHO is an agency of the UN which was created by international treaty which carries the force of law. The WHO states of its “IHR,” International Health Regulations:

“This binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007.”

The WHO is widely known to be a creature of billionaire Bill Gates, who contributes about $900 million per year to the UN organization, if Gates controlled GAVI is included. This makes Gates the single largest donor to WHO, surpassing even the US. See: “Bill Gates’ W.H.O. Power-Play Will Give Him US Sovereignty #StopTheTreaty

HR 419 Action Page by Association of American Physicians and Surgeons "


1653349402768.png



Funding contributions over GAVI’s 20-year life (source)

The WHO should be outlawed in The US and no one should be allowed to send them money. They should be declared a global terrorist network.
 
No, the WHO would not have control over governments during a global health crisis. The amendments to the International Health Regulations would allow WHO member countries to share data and better prepare for future pandemics, but preserve the authority of individual countries.


They do not give the WHO authority over the governments of any of its 194 member countries and allows countries to reject WHO assistance. They do require member countries to not impede the movement of health care workers and medical supplies.
 
Do you believe they could use this to come after our guns?
Of course they would if they thought they can get away with it under the color of international treaty law.
In April, President Joe Biden said the country was facing "a gun violence public health epidemic,"
Walensky from the CDC has said the same things.
For the first time in decades, the director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — the nation’s top public health agency — is speaking out forcefully about gun violence in America, calling it a “serious public health threat.”

“Something has to be done about this,” CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said in an exclusive interview with CNN. “Now is the time — it’s pedal to the metal time.”

“The scope of the problem is just bigger than we’re even hearing about, and when your heart wrenches every day you turn on the news, you’re only hearing the tip of the iceberg,” Walensky said. “We haven’t spent the time, energy and frankly the resources to understand this problem because it’s been so divided.”

“I swore to the President and to this country that I would protect your health. This is clearly one of those moments, one of those issues that is harming America’s health,” Walensky said.

 
Let the SOBs try to enforce it. But the senate will never ratify it.

.
These are amendments to an already approved treaty so no Senate confirmation required. DC drafted them.
A simple majority vote of 194 WHO member nations is all that's needed
 
These are amendments to an already approved treaty so no Senate confirmation required. DC drafted them.
A simple majority vote of 194 WHO member nations is all that's needed


If a treaty is materially altered, it requires ratification, especially if it violates the Constitution.

.
 
If a treaty is materially altered, it requires ratification, especially if it violates the Constitution.

.
Ask yourself who you think will make the determination if it qualifies as "materially altered"?
Do you trust the DOJ or SCOTUS to protect us from unlawful power grabs? They sure didn't with clot shots
This is a backdoor attempt at globalist subjugation, just like they previously tried with the UN Treaty on Small Arms.
My eyes are open & my trust level in govt no longer registers on the meter.
 
No, the WHO would not have control over governments during a global health crisis. The amendments to the International Health Regulations would allow WHO member countries to share data and better prepare for future pandemics, but preserve the authority of individual countries.


They do not give the WHO authority over the governments of any of its 194 member countries and allows countries to reject WHO assistance. They do require member countries to not impede the movement of health care workers and medical supplies.
Says the people saying hunters laptop is russian disinformation.

If you believe a word one of these groomercrats say, do America a favor and kill yourself.
 
Let the SOBs try to enforce it. But the senate will never ratify it.

.
The WHO has no enforcement arm other than member states.
Says the people saying hunters laptop is russian disinformation.

If you believe a word one of these groomercrats say, do America a favor and kill yourself.

Says the Moroonie Groomed by Bannon's babbling's. Please don't kill yourself, it will be funnier that way.
 
Ask yourself who you think will make the determination if it qualifies as "materially altered"?
Do you trust the DOJ or SCOTUS to protect us from unlawful power grabs? They sure didn't with clot shots
This is a backdoor attempt at globalist subjugation, just like they previously tried with the UN Treaty on Small Arms.
My eyes are open & my trust level in govt no longer registers on the meter.


I think the current SCOTUS might have something to say about it.

.
 
Signing over our sovereignty. Another example of how much Veggie Joe hates America.
 
Short of local or federal police then there will be no enforcement for what will be mostly unwilling participants. Americans will not allow POTUS to assign governing authority to the unelected and entirely unknown members of the WHO.
 

Forum List

Back
Top