M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
Streetcars are far more limited than automobiles.Forced marriage; people in L.A. LOVED their streetcars until corporations destroyed mass transit in that once great, now shithole, city.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Streetcars are far more limited than automobiles.Forced marriage; people in L.A. LOVED their streetcars until corporations destroyed mass transit in that once great, now shithole, city.
They're not going to work for plumbers or roofers or cable installers it's true.Streetcars are far more limited than automobiles.
95% of the populaion that live in cities that have them and have no want tor need to go somewhere else, sure.They're not going to work for plumbers or roofers or cable installers it's true.
But for about 95% or so of the population, they're fine.
Forced marriage; people in L.A. LOVED their streetcars until corporations destroyed mass transit in that once great, now shithole, city.
Or get involved with a pack of strangers, many of them dangerous and thieving.Nobody destroyed anything. People simple prefer better which is a personal automobile. Mass transit can't survive without taxpayer subsides. Very few want to wait for buses, street cars, Ubers or taxi's.
England is roughly the size of Alabama and it takes about 7 hours to drive from the South to the Northern part of the stateAccording to the paper, “The average car or van in England is driven just 4% of the time.”
Could make sense to belong to a car sharing program
Ride/vehicle sharing could work well in less densely populated areas.95% of the populaion that live in cities that have them and have no want tor need to go somewhere else, sure.
Automobiles give you the freedom to go where you want when you want - streetcars do not.
Well, as corporations are legally people, somebody/s absolutely did.Nobody destroyed anything.
See above; millions prefer mass transit, but were forced into cars in places like L.A. with disastrous results.People simple prefer better which is a personal automobile.
See above, and thank GM et al for their trillion dollar crimes against The People.Mass transit can't survive without taxpayer subsides.
See above; many prefer mass transit.Very few want to wait for buses, street cars, Ubers or taxi's.
I'm not aware of any evidence which indicates that one is in greater danger using mass transit than other forms of travel.Or get involved with a pack of strangers, many of them dangerous and thieving.
Is mass transit getting as much taxpayer subsidies as air travel and personal vehicles? The tax we pay ay the gasoline pump doesn`t come close to maintaining our roads and bridges.Nobody destroyed anything. People simple prefer better which is a personal automobile. Mass transit can't survive without taxpayer subsides. Very few want to wait for buses, street cars, Ubers or taxi's.
Much of that money is put into the general fund. Labor is much more expensive in road and bridge construction, and we do not get the bang for the buck like over a half a century ago and before that.Is mass transit getting as much taxpayer subsidies as air travel and personal vehicles? The tax we pay ay the gasoline pump doesn`t come close to maintaining our roads and bridges.
Everything is more expensive than it was 50 years ago including the materials and equipment.Much of that money is put into the general fund. Labor is much more expensive in road and bridge construction, and we do not get the bang for the buck like over a half a century ago and before that.
Work rules and union rules and corruption gets one tenth of what was done over a period of time for the price. It is a disgrace.Everything is more expensive than it was 50 years ago including the materials and equipment.
Is mass transit getting as much taxpayer subsidies as air travel and personal vehicles? The tax we pay ay the gasoline pump doesn`t come close to maintaining our roads and bridges.
Without subsidies where could we drive our cars other than toll roads? The tax paid at the pump doesn`t even come close to funding our highways.Outside of electric cars nobody is getting tax subsidies for vehicles. Subsidies are provided to products nobody really wants like mass transit. The government didn't have to give subsidies for cell phones, cable television or big screens. Everybody wanted them as soon as they could afford these things.
Here our consumption tax funds the buses. Without the tax the bus company couldn't stay open because the only people that use buses are those who don't have a license, lost their license, or can't afford a reliable car. There may be a few outliers who have a license and vehicle, but hate driving.
You don't live in a rural area, do you ?Ride/vehicle sharing could work well in less densely populated areas.
Without subsidies where could we drive our cars other than toll roads? The tax paid at the pump doesn`t even come close to funding our highways.
Highway funding other than fuel tax isn't a subsidy, because it does nothing to reduce the cost of a commercial product.Without subsidies where could we drive our cars other than toll roads? The tax paid at the pump doesn`t even come close to funding our highways.
Irrelevant inquiry.You don't live in a rural area, do you ?
This presumes many things which may not pertain.Ride sharing only works when there are a number of people with similar chanedules and transportation requirements.
See above.Fewer people = less correlation between those schedules and requirements.
See above.Rather than waiting to meet up with someone else, most people will choose to go by themselves, when its convenient for them.
Automobiles are the Scam of the 20th Century.Automobiles are freedom.
As your reply contains no substance whatsoever, I accept your concession of the point.Irrelevant inquiry.
This presumes many things which may not pertain.
See above.
See above.
Automobiles are the Scam of the 20th Century.