Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How much is needed to NOT need the government to subsidize his living expenses and food etc. That's how much. No matter your job title as a human being we ALL deserve a wage we can live off of.everyone benefits when everything is going good and everyone loses jobs/money when things go bad. Simple as that. As it is now ONLY the CEO's rich etc whatever benefit when things are going good who then cash in their stocks etc when shit hits the fan and the workers are SOL. Not the way it should work.1. I don't believe it
2. CLINTON did not say it
3. IF she believes it its fine with me. Why should some get paid millions while those making the product and selling the product make barely enough to cover gas to and from work and then depend on government to give them food stamps and medicaid while the bosses go home to mansions and expensive cars> Profit sharing is a good idea. Everyone should be equal in a workplace environment at least enough to not need government help to make ends meet.Greedy capitalists are bringing this on themselves.
How do you feel about loss sharing?
So just how much do you want to pay a janitor?
And yet it doesn't fuck things up when the CEO's are making enough for hundreds sometimes THOUSANDS of workers doesn't fuck things up but amazingly paying people a livable wage would somehow fuck things up....hmmmm I call bullshit.How much is needed to NOT need the government to subsidize his living expenses and food etc. That's how much. No matter your job title as a human being we ALL deserve a wage we can live off of.everyone benefits when everything is going good and everyone loses jobs/money when things go bad. Simple as that. As it is now ONLY the CEO's rich etc whatever benefit when things are going good who then cash in their stocks etc when shit hits the fan and the workers are SOL. Not the way it should work.1. I don't believe it
2. CLINTON did not say it
3. IF she believes it its fine with me. Why should some get paid millions while those making the product and selling the product make barely enough to cover gas to and from work and then depend on government to give them food stamps and medicaid while the bosses go home to mansions and expensive cars> Profit sharing is a good idea. Everyone should be equal in a workplace environment at least enough to not need government help to make ends meet.Greedy capitalists are bringing this on themselves.
How do you feel about loss sharing?
So just how much do you want to pay a janitor?
It's the same old argument about a living wage from a different angle.
Do we really need to go through all the reasons this would fuck things up?
And in fact this would be worse. Inflation and higher prices would eat any benefit you may gain in short order.
This is nothing but pandering to the stupid.
Like the CEO's "earned" it by benefiting from the hard work of the workers making and selling their product AKA steal it from the workers....yeah great idea...hell worked so well for the CEO's mine as well let the workers do same! But then the workers aka the little guy would get thrown in prison while the folks "to big to jail" get nice hefty benefits and bonuses after being bailed out by the government.How much is needed to NOT need the government to subsidize his living expenses and food etc. That's how much. No matter your job title as a human being we ALL deserve a wage we can live off of.everyone benefits when everything is going good and everyone loses jobs/money when things go bad. Simple as that. As it is now ONLY the CEO's rich etc whatever benefit when things are going good who then cash in their stocks etc when shit hits the fan and the workers are SOL. Not the way it should work.1. I don't believe it
2. CLINTON did not say it
3. IF she believes it its fine with me. Why should some get paid millions while those making the product and selling the product make barely enough to cover gas to and from work and then depend on government to give them food stamps and medicaid while the bosses go home to mansions and expensive cars> Profit sharing is a good idea. Everyone should be equal in a workplace environment at least enough to not need government help to make ends meet.Greedy capitalists are bringing this on themselves.
How do you feel about loss sharing?
So just how much do you want to pay a janitor?
No we don't. An employer has no responsibility to support the decisions you make in life.
And the government shouldn't be responsible either.
You want more money, earn it.
You want to share in profits, earn it.
One doesn't have to be rich or privileged to accomplish either.
And yet it doesn't fuck things up when the CEO's are making enough for hundreds sometimes THOUSANDS of workers doesn't fuck things up but amazingly paying people a livable wage would somehow fuck things up....hmmmm I call bullshit.How much is needed to NOT need the government to subsidize his living expenses and food etc. That's how much. No matter your job title as a human being we ALL deserve a wage we can live off of.everyone benefits when everything is going good and everyone loses jobs/money when things go bad. Simple as that. As it is now ONLY the CEO's rich etc whatever benefit when things are going good who then cash in their stocks etc when shit hits the fan and the workers are SOL. Not the way it should work.How do you feel about loss sharing?
So just how much do you want to pay a janitor?
It's the same old argument about a living wage from a different angle.
Do we really need to go through all the reasons this would fuck things up?
And in fact this would be worse. Inflation and higher prices would eat any benefit you may gain in short order.
This is nothing but pandering to the stupid.
Actually neither. I rent my own home and my father lives with me my wife and 4 kids because as a good son I take care of my elders when they get old.And yet it doesn't fuck things up when the CEO's are making enough for hundreds sometimes THOUSANDS of workers doesn't fuck things up but amazingly paying people a livable wage would somehow fuck things up....hmmmm I call bullshit.How much is needed to NOT need the government to subsidize his living expenses and food etc. That's how much. No matter your job title as a human being we ALL deserve a wage we can live off of.everyone benefits when everything is going good and everyone loses jobs/money when things go bad. Simple as that. As it is now ONLY the CEO's rich etc whatever benefit when things are going good who then cash in their stocks etc when shit hits the fan and the workers are SOL. Not the way it should work.
So just how much do you want to pay a janitor?
It's the same old argument about a living wage from a different angle.
Do we really need to go through all the reasons this would fuck things up?
And in fact this would be worse. Inflation and higher prices would eat any benefit you may gain in short order.
This is nothing but pandering to the stupid.
You're either trolling or you still live at home with mom and dad....possibly both.
That are not enough to live off of. Try again.Workers already receive profit sharing. Its called wages....
Workers already receive profit sharing. Its called wages....
How much more are you willing to pay for goods and services so that every worker gets a "living wage"?That are not enough to live off of. Try again.Workers already receive profit sharing. Its called wages....
Actually neither. I rent my own home and my father lives with me my wife and 4 kids because as a good son I take care of my elders when they get old.And yet it doesn't fuck things up when the CEO's are making enough for hundreds sometimes THOUSANDS of workers doesn't fuck things up but amazingly paying people a livable wage would somehow fuck things up....hmmmm I call bullshit.How much is needed to NOT need the government to subsidize his living expenses and food etc. That's how much. No matter your job title as a human being we ALL deserve a wage we can live off of.So just how much do you want to pay a janitor?
It's the same old argument about a living wage from a different angle.
Do we really need to go through all the reasons this would fuck things up?
And in fact this would be worse. Inflation and higher prices would eat any benefit you may gain in short order.
This is nothing but pandering to the stupid.
You're either trolling or you still live at home with mom and dad....possibly both.
I am more than willing to do like Western European nations do. That being said ALL of us have taxes that are paid on goods or incomes or taken from checks that SHOULD and IS more than enough to pay every worker a livable wage instead its used for foreign aide,corporate welfare and war.How much more are you willing to pay for goods and services so that every worker gets a "living wage"?That are not enough to live off of. Try again.Workers already receive profit sharing. Its called wages....
Actually neither. I rent my own home and my father lives with me my wife and 4 kids because as a good son I take care of my elders when they get old.And yet it doesn't fuck things up when the CEO's are making enough for hundreds sometimes THOUSANDS of workers doesn't fuck things up but amazingly paying people a livable wage would somehow fuck things up....hmmmm I call bullshit.How much is needed to NOT need the government to subsidize his living expenses and food etc. That's how much. No matter your job title as a human being we ALL deserve a wage we can live off of.
It's the same old argument about a living wage from a different angle.
Do we really need to go through all the reasons this would fuck things up?
And in fact this would be worse. Inflation and higher prices would eat any benefit you may gain in short order.
This is nothing but pandering to the stupid.
You're either trolling or you still live at home with mom and dad....possibly both.
You act like that makes you special somehow?
At 2.04...
Employer.......Workers already receive profit sharing. Its called wages....
And 401k matching as long as you get a halfway decent job.
You need more to live on, then I suggest you put in the extra hours....get more education....get a second job......That are not enough to live off of. Try again.Workers already receive profit sharing. Its called wages....
It appears the DemocRATS have 2 choices this nomination cycle....We now know Hillary's team are Communists, and then we have Bernie 'The Red" Sanders, perhaps a slightly LESS RED than the Hildebeast (As she tries to position herself LEFT of a leftist!).... One has to laugh at the DemocRATS, BUT must always take them seriously as they have the MSM (95% behind the 5th column)
Actually neither. I rent my own home and my father lives with me my wife and 4 kids because as a good son I take care of my elders when they get old.And yet it doesn't fuck things up when the CEO's are making enough for hundreds sometimes THOUSANDS of workers doesn't fuck things up but amazingly paying people a livable wage would somehow fuck things up....hmmmm I call bullshit.It's the same old argument about a living wage from a different angle.
Do we really need to go through all the reasons this would fuck things up?
And in fact this would be worse. Inflation and higher prices would eat any benefit you may gain in short order.
This is nothing but pandering to the stupid.
You're either trolling or you still live at home with mom and dad....possibly both.
You act like that makes you special somehow?
At 2.04...
Did I say that> Nope. I was just refuting your childish rant about being a troll or living at home.
It appears the DemocRATS have 2 choices this nomination cycle....We now know Hillary's team are Communists, and then we have Bernie 'The Red" Sanders, perhaps a slightly LESS RED than the Hildebeast (As she tries to position herself LEFT of a leftist!).... One has to laugh at the DemocRATS, BUT must always take them seriously as they have the MSM (95% behind the 5th column)
Clinton is a moderate.
Sanders is socially liberal and looks to European nations as example of how socialist principles could work. He references Sweden and Germany a lot.
