Wondering Who Are Democrat Communist Mamdani's Voters?

[BluesLegend]

Wondering Who Are Democrat Communist Mamdani's Voters?​

Right, because I lived in NY and your typical NY'er is not even in the same zip code as a communist. Maybe a bunch of commies and mooching losers moved into NYC.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Right, because I lived in NY and your typical NY'er is not even in the same zip code as a communist. Maybe a bunch of commies and mooching losers moved into NYC.

I believe you are correct......but did you notice he keeps playing his rhetoric a fighting Trump?

There are lots of Democrats/Leftists here in the Big Apple.

 

[Failzero]

Sometimes it’s a very simple process. All of your points are valid but if you’re dealing with an entire party of moronic sheep voters, facts and issues are moot. It become a preaching-to-the-choir thing.

Preaching to the Socially Liberal / Fiscally Conservative choir .

 

[Hafar1014]

Decades of socialism taught in the schools and universities have a created false image among many who have no idea what its like to experience it first hand. Maybe now they will get the chance. Experiencing it is what it will take to teach them the truth.

 

[Failzero]

Right, because I lived in NY and your typical NY'er is not even in the same zip code as a communist. Maybe a bunch of commies and mooching losers moved into NYC.

There have been lotsa Marxists in Brooklyn / Flushing Queens / The Bronx / Manhattan for many generations some hail from a long line of Marxist Teachers & Profs dating back to the Battles with the Bundists at Madison Square Garden before the War and the Red Diaper Camps in the Catskills

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

They are not all 'moronic sheep.'

Wouldn't it be more interesting reading if the reasoning was more deeply examined?

My premise is that the Democrats/Socialists have found an attractive opening: envy.

And no one has asked about this in the OP " And the Democrat promises of such are the second greatest lie that the Left tells,...."


I guess everyone knows the first greatest lie of socialism.

If they can’t compartmentalize their envy, they’re morons.

 

[PoliticalChic]

If they can’t compartmentalize their envy, they’re morons.

Not a very deep analysis.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Decades of socialism taught in the schools and universities have a created false image among many who have no idea what its like to experience it first hand. Maybe now they will get the chance. Experiencing it is what it will take to teach them the truth.

The very reason we are a home school family.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Not a very deep analysis.

It’s as deep as necessary. Concise.

 

[Edgetho]

I really like the tone of your post.

There are some 100 million illegals living and WORKING, successfully, in this country (know why you have to press #1 for English) and that's just what the Democrats....and a lot of Republicans, too.....want. The Dems want votes because nearly all of the illegals have fake documentation.

Even the legislation to crack down on illegals asks if they have been here more than 5 years....most have...and have no criminal record.

Clinton's "Motor-Voter" garbage was designed to facillitate voter fraud from its inception.

As to crimes committed by illegals? My Wife personally has hired the same illegal over 5 times under a different name, different SSN each time. That was back in the day. Things have changed but it's no better today. Every time the goobermint comes up with a new program, they outsmart it. Criminals been out-smarting government since the beginning of time.

They come up here, work for a little while, go home and live like Kings (to them) for 6 Months to 2 years, come back here and get new docs, new name, start over. Of course they have no criminal record, they're using 5 different names.

 

[Leo123]

Clinton's "Motor-Voter" garbage was designed to facillitate voter fraud from its inception.

As to crimes committed by illegals? My Wife personally has hired the same illegal over 5 times under a different name, different SSN each time. That was back in the day. Things have changed but it's no better today. Every time the goobermint comes up with a new program, they outsmart it. Criminals been out-smarting government since the beginning of time.

They come up here, work for a little while, go home and live like Kings (to them) for 6 Months to 2 years, come back here and get new docs, new name, start over. Of course they have no criminal record, they're using 5 different names.

In Silicon valley, when it was largely manufacturing, they would hire illegals to run NC drilling machines. Most would send money back to Mexico so their families could purchase property. INS (Now ICE) would raid the company occasionally and those caught were deported but, they'd be back in a couple weeks.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It’s as deep as necessary. Concise.

We have different aspirations for the message board.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Clinton's "Motor-Voter" garbage was designed to facillitate voter fraud from its inception.

As to crimes committed by illegals? My Wife personally has hired the same illegal over 5 times under a different name, different SSN each time. That was back in the day. Things have changed but it's no better today. Every time the goobermint comes up with a new program, they outsmart it. Criminals been out-smarting government since the beginning of time.

They come up here, work for a little while, go home and live like Kings (to them) for 6 Months to 2 years, come back here and get new docs, new name, start over. Of course they have no criminal record, they're using 5 different names.

And there is this:



“In all, nearly 60 percent of immigrants—legal and illegal—are on government assistance, compared with 39 percent of native households. Why would any country voluntarily bring in people who have to be supported by the taxpayer?”
― Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole



“The conservative Heritage Foundation estimated unlawful immigrant households paid $39.2 billion in 2010, but received $93.7 billion in government services.” -- Oliver Darcy
Of course it is far greater today.

It is re-distribution of wealth from earners to Democrat voters.



“The Federation for American Immigration Reform Monday put the five-year price tag at $8.8 billion in federal and state costs, or nearly $80,000 per refugee. There are some 18 federal and state programs refugees can tap for financial help, including food stamps, child care, public housing and school loans.

On a yearly average, it is $1.8 billion, or $15,900 per refugee. Included in that are enormous refugee resettlement costs such as $867 million in welfare, housing assistance and education.

… 50 percent of refugees remain on Medicaid for five years.

The Fiscal Cost of Resettling Refugees in the United States

• The cost per refugee to American taxpayers just under $79,600 every year in the first five years after a refugee is resettled in the U.S.
• In 2016, the State Department spent nearly $545 million to process and resettle refugees, including $140,389,177 on transportation costs.
• Of the $1.8 billion in resettlement costs, $867 billion was spent on welfare alone.
• In their first five years, approximately 54 percent of all refugees will hold jobs that pay less than $11 an hour.
• $71 million will be spent to educate refugees and asylum-seekers, a majority of which will be paid by state and local governments.
• Over five years, an estimated 15.7 percent of all refugees will need housing assistance, which is roughly $7,600 per household in 2014 dollars.

Refugee costs: $8.8 billion, $80,000 per immigrant, free welfare, Medicaid - Washington Examiner

 

[PoliticalChic]

The import of the earlier parts of the thread stress that many, maybe most, of socialist/Demorat/Mamdani voters do so due to envy, a demand for monetary equality in the nation.....something never promised in any of America's founding documents.....

....but the path to power for every totalitarian regime that ever existed.


Where in this discussion is the question of personal responsibility in achieving success or of the free market’s hand in distributing rewards?
Or is the assumption that these factors don’t exist?
Why not presume that the richer person merited his wealth?
Very few millionaires inherited their wealth.


And an unspoken reason why government is all too willing to take from some and give to another:
As government taxes more and subsidizes more, a greater portion of society’s wealth passes through its hands. Individuals and families have less income to dispose of as they see fit. “…redistribution is in effect far less a redistribution of free income from the richer to the poorer, as we imagined, than a redistribution of power from the individual to the State.” Bertrand de Jouvenel, “The Ethics of Redistribution,” p. 73

 

[Etymology gaslight]

Many of us who witnessed the NYC mayor's debate wondered how anyone could vote for the Democrat Communist Mamdani. Here's how.


1. Certainly every American wishes for equality before the law. But the text and the subtext of Democrat Communist success is based on equality of an exact similarity of material wealth or income, and it should be the goal of ‘social justice.’
And the Democrat promises of such are the second greatest lie that the Left tells, just look at the bankbooks of the Democrat officials who promist said equality.


2. . By the 20th century, the new ‘equality’ became a threat to freedom. FDR’s New Deal and Truman’s Fair Deal claimed the rectification of inequalities as within the purview of government. LBJ’s Great Society championed the redistribution of wealth and status in the name of equality. Realize that the concomitant movement toward collectivism meant a decline in the freedoms of business, private associations, families, and individuals.

a. The desire for equality of income or of wealth is, of course, but one aspect of a more general desire for equality. “The essence of the moral idea of socialism is that human equality is the supreme value in life.” Martin Malia, “A Fatal Logic,” The National Interest, Spring 1993, pp. 80, 87




3. Since one cannot see any objective harm done to the less wealthy by another’s greater wealth, the explanation for the ‘economic equality imperative’ can only be envy. The resentment of luxury in another is evil, in that there is no benefit to depriving others with no gain to ourselves. What is the satisfaction of seeing the better off lessened.
President Clinton proposed raising taxes on the rich, even though it didn’t appear that it would increase tax revenues. A sizable portion of the public agreed, even under these circumstances. The motive can only be envy.



4. Sociologist Helmut Schoeck’s observation: “Since the end of the Second World War, however, a new ‘ethic’ has come into being, according to which the envious man is perfectly acceptable. Progressively fewer individuals and groups are ashamed of their envy, but instead make out that its existence in their temperaments axiomatically proves the existence of ‘social injustice,’ which must be eliminated for their benefit.” Helmut Schoeck, “Envy: A Theory of Social Behavior,” p. 179



5. . “Modern liberalism has corrupted the concept of ‘equality,’ and replaced it with a radical egalitarianism: equality is imposed even when normal distinctions militate against it. That notion caused the prompt skewing of the non-discrimination laws by the bureaucrats and courts into whose care the implementation of the policy was given. Non-discrimination became discrimination, but against different people: white males. The new discrimination did not violate the tenets of radical egalitarianism, because modern liberals, who control these policies, do not think in terms of individuals but in terms of groups. Thus, proportional representation of groups in the workplace, on faculties, and in student bodies looks like non-discrimination to them. That is the rationale for affirmative action.” Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 79



For many, as the NYC election may very well prove, demanding that government give them what others have worked to earn, is the going price of their vote.

Spot on as always PC.
The Dramacrat is looking for a new coop
to roost