Wondering Who Are Democrat Communist Mamdani's Voters?

Care to offer a guess at how the multiple millions of illegasl ushered in by the Democrats, will vote.
And they do vote:


AI Overview


There is strong evidence that the fake social security and documents industry is a multi-billion dollar problem, especially when considering the widespread use of fraudulent information for government relief and tax fraud
. While pinning down an exact figure is difficult, reports on pandemic-related fraud and the Social Security Administration's (SSA) earnings suspense file indicate massive financial losses.


Certainly those who excuse illegal entry into the country because they "can't blame any who wish for a better life" won't blame them for voting for the party that welcomed them and promised them all sorts of things.

NY democrats have built an unassailable fortress of voter fraud: Illegals, fake, phony, fraud, mail in and no ID ballots. There is less than zero effort in the RNC or in the White House to correct this

Of course, I could be mistaken. The SNL Crowd cheered wildly at the mention of the Muslim Communist, so maybe this is what real New Yorkers want

Mayor Mamdani, the City is yours!
 
Let's see it.

How many voted in our elections? Is there any evidence of it?
Can't begin to tell you how pleased you asked.




Let me quote some experts:

Let's prove the 50 to 80 million number, with quotes and documentation, added to the 12.5 million Biden-Harris brought in.



"Est., 11 million illegals."









Case in point: while millions of illegal aliens filter into the country year after year, the very same figure...."11 million illegal aliens live in the country"....neither changes nor is questioned.



2. "... no number has been given greater certitude and less investigation than that. Not even the number of planets in our solar system has enjoyed such constancy and acceptance.



Imagine the reaction if the media reported daily that this 20 million cohort, supplemented by chain migration and family reunification mandates, would swell to 40 million or 50 million in a decade."
How Many Illegal Immigrants Live in the US?





There are between 50 million and 80 million illegal aliens living in this country.







3. James H. Walsh, formerly an Associate General Counsel of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) in the United States Department of Justice, writes



"... the U.S. Census Bureau routinely undercounts and then adjusts upward total census numbers of Hispanics and other foreign nationals residing in the United States––counting only, of course, those willing to be counted. For the year 2000, the Census Bureau reported a total U.S. population count of “about 275 million” men, women, and children.



When the states and local governments challenged that number as an undercount, the total was corrected upward to 281.4 million, with no clear count of illegal aliens. The Hispanic 2000 census count was 32.8 million, but on re-count the Census Bureau adjusted this number upward to 35.3 million, a 13 percent increase."

How many illegal aliens reside in the United States? | CAIRCO - Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform | issues legislation projects research



Increased the totals by 13%!!!

Now....hold on tight....this is gonna involve mathematics, so I may lose you here:




Soooo....if we apply that same 'adjustment' to the fabled 11 million....over a decade of so....we have almost 40 million.









But wait!!!

There's more!




4. Another way to arrive at the numbers of illegals in the country is to base it on the number of apprehensions and escapes.



"The average number of recorded apprehensions of illegal aliens in the United States now hovers at 1.2 million a year [in 2007].
A DHS report, Border Apprehensions: 2005, documented 1.3 million apprehensions in 2005. For the 10-year period (1996–2005), the highest number of apprehensions, 1.8 million, occurred in 2000, and the lowest, 1 million, in 2003. These DHS statistics contradict persistent statements by other government agencies that only 400,000 to 500,000 illegal aliens enter the country each year.





Journeymen Border Patrol agents (on the job five years or more) estimate that a minimum of five illegal aliens enter the United States for each apprehension, and more likely seven. That informed estimate would raise the total number of illegal aliens entering the United States in 2003 to 8 million men, women, and children.



He concludes that:



My estimate of 38 million illegal aliens residing in the United States is calculated, however, using a conservative annual rate of entry (allowing for deaths and returns to their homelands) of three illegal aliens entering the United States for each one apprehended. My estimate includes apprehensions at the Southern Border (by far, the majority), at the Northern Border, along the Pacific, Atlantic, and Gulf of Mexico coasts, and at seaports and airports.









5. Taking the DHS average of 1.2 million apprehensions per year and multiplying it by 3 comes to 3.6 million illegal entries per year; then multiplying that number by 10 for the 1996–2005 period, my calculations come to 36 million illegal entries into the United States. Add to this the approximately 2 million visa overstays during the same period, and the total is 38 million illegal aliens currently in the United States."

How many illegal aliens reside in the United States? | CAIRCO - Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform | issues legislation projects research



....and that number is over a decade old!!!!!!



Gettin' nervous?





6. But other Border Patrol agents estimate that a minimum of five illegal aliens enter the United States for each apprehension, and more likely seven......which would give a total of nearly 80 million illegals occupying our country.



The number of illegals would be at least.....at least.....60-80 million at this time.....permanently residing right here is this country.





Hence...even a tiny fraction of them voting would be 3-6 million votes.





And lots of 'em vote.......after all, that's why the Democrats brought them here.
 
Most of those rioting/protesting are simply your run of the mill Democrats.

Karoline Leavitt: on Zohran Mamdani's refusal to call on Hamas to lay down its arms: "This interview proved that the Democrat Party's main constituencies are made up of Hamas terrorists, illegal aliens, and violent criminals — that is who the Democrat Party is catering to."
They may be Democrats, not sure if run of the mill. Most of them don't really know the issues, they're there to make a buck from whomever is sponsoring the protest.
 
They may be Democrats, not sure if run of the mill. Most of them don't really know the issues, they're there to make a buck from whomever is sponsoring the protest.
I believe you may be 100% correct.



AI Overview


Following a report from the conservative Capital Research Center (CRC), the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) under the Trump administration has been investigating George Soros and the Open Society Foundations (OSF) on allegations of funding extremist groups
. The investigations have been widely condemned by civil society groups and legal experts as politically motivated.

Capital Research Center's report
  • In September 2025, the DOJ initiated the investigation based partly on a CRC report that accused OSF of providing $80 million to "pro-terror" groups involved in riots in 2020.
 
Many of us who witnessed the NYC mayor's debate wondered how anyone could vote for the Democrat Communist Mamdani. Here's how.


1. Certainly every American wishes for equality before the law. But the text and the subtext of Democrat Communist success is based on equality of an exact similarity of material wealth or income, and it should be the goal of ‘social justice.’
And the Democrat promises of such are the second greatest lie that the Left tells, just look at the bankbooks of the Democrat officials who promist said equality.


2. . By the 20th century, the new ‘equality’ became a threat to freedom. FDR’s New Deal and Truman’s Fair Deal claimed the rectification of inequalities as within the purview of government. LBJ’s Great Society championed the redistribution of wealth and status in the name of equality. Realize that the concomitant movement toward collectivism meant a decline in the freedoms of business, private associations, families, and individuals.

a. The desire for equality of income or of wealth is, of course, but one aspect of a more general desire for equality. “The essence of the moral idea of socialism is that human equality is the supreme value in life.” Martin Malia, “A Fatal Logic,” The National Interest, Spring 1993, pp. 80, 87




3. Since one cannot see any objective harm done to the less wealthy by another’s greater wealth, the explanation for the ‘economic equality imperative’ can only be envy. The resentment of luxury in another is evil, in that there is no benefit to depriving others with no gain to ourselves. What is the satisfaction of seeing the better off lessened.
President Clinton proposed raising taxes on the rich, even though it didn’t appear that it would increase tax revenues. A sizable portion of the public agreed, even under these circumstances. The motive can only be envy.



4. Sociologist Helmut Schoeck’s observation: “Since the end of the Second World War, however, a new ‘ethic’ has come into being, according to which the envious man is perfectly acceptable. Progressively fewer individuals and groups are ashamed of their envy, but instead make out that its existence in their temperaments axiomatically proves the existence of ‘social injustice,’ which must be eliminated for their benefit.” Helmut Schoeck, “Envy: A Theory of Social Behavior,” p. 179



5. . “Modern liberalism has corrupted the concept of ‘equality,’ and replaced it with a radical egalitarianism: equality is imposed even when normal distinctions militate against it. That notion caused the prompt skewing of the non-discrimination laws by the bureaucrats and courts into whose care the implementation of the policy was given. Non-discrimination became discrimination, but against different people: white males. The new discrimination did not violate the tenets of radical egalitarianism, because modern liberals, who control these policies, do not think in terms of individuals but in terms of groups. Thus, proportional representation of groups in the workplace, on faculties, and in student bodies looks like non-discrimination to them. That is the rationale for affirmative action.” Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 79



For many, as the NYC election may very well prove, demanding that government give them what others have worked to earn, is the going price of their vote.
Makes one wish Tammany Hall was still around, minus the mob connections.
 
View attachment 1174422

Actually there's a rising majority of young people who are becoming conservative it's the older groups that have been brainwashed...

SMILE



:)

Todays democracks attract hateful women, primarily post menopause or hovering, and the men they lead by the balls. They're the left's biggest mouths, and ****, they got big mouths, psychos.
 
Makes one wish Tammany Hall was still around, minus the mob connections..
If you mean that Tammany Hall would have prevented Mamdani from, as he claimed, "won the soul of the Democrat Party," I'm not so sure.
Schumer and Jeffries haven't endorced Mamdani, but lots of mainstream Democrats are with him. Obama called him on the phone.
The establishment Democrats know what being outright and openly communist will do in a national election,and how the Republicans are loving it, but a large segment of the Democrat Party has always been communist.


Kengor's book:


About half of the Party’s supporter always came from the interchangeable terms socialist/communist/Progressive/ etc. Professor Kengor said this, describing the Menshevik element:

"The progressive left, and the liberal left, while not themselves communists, share many of the same sympathies, such of redistribution of wealth, and worker’s rights, nationalizations of industry, etc, but are not quite as far left as the communists, and would not go to the same lengths as the communists to achieve their goals. This does not mean, though, that the help of these dupes is not necessary in order for the communists to achieve victory. Even at their peak, in the ‘30’s, the Communist Party of the United States never had more than 100 thousand members: so deception of the ‘dupes’ was critical. "
Dr. Paul Kengor, Hoover Institution, Stanford “DUPES: How America's Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century


1759760856936.webp
 
3. Since one cannot see any objective harm done to the less wealthy by another’s greater wealth, the explanation for the ‘economic equality imperative’ can only be envy.
I see two types of wealth. One is the wealth you earn by working hard, developing something new, having a talent, etc. Things you do like starting Apple or Microsoft. That wealth is good for everyone and should be celebrated and only lightly taxed. The other type of wealth is the kind you inherit. Wealth you get as an accident of birth but do nothing to earn. That wealth is NOT good for everyone and should be heavily taxed. The downside of inherited wealth is that it tends to establish family dynasties that can freeze out those not born to wealth. The old nobility and rigid class system of England is an example. People outside the upper classes had little access to education or capital. How many Einsteins and Steve Jobses (sic?) toiled in poverty and never got to make their contributions.
 
Professors at the University of Chicago law school, Blum and Kalven examined and found very little support for progressive taxation as “the possible rationale for desiring to lessen economic inequalities within the confines of a private enterprise and market system,” and found, on the contrary, that since there have been enormous increases in wealth, even among the poorest, and yet the issue of inequality has become more outspoken, “It initially appears that what is involved is envy, the dissatisfaction produced in men not by what they lack but by what others have.”
Blum and Klaven, jr., “The Uneasy Case for Progressive Taxation.”
 
The last time I was up there it was like a third world country. The people there are stupid and ignorant and can't comprehend basic economics. This is what they deserve.
 
Those on the streets today are Communists. They would vote Communist. People forget the pain of those regimes. And the kicker is that many of these same peasants will be eliminated as the economy contracts.
 
Many are Non Practicing Ethnic only Jews from a long line of Brooklyn / Bronx / Flushing Queens Marxists dating back to the Sacco & Vanzetti era and the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire . And they have Great Grandparents who boasted about living down the hall in the same building as the Rosenbergs .
 
Care to offer a guess at how the multiple millions of illegasl ushered in by the Democrats, will vote.
And they do vote:


AI Overview


There is strong evidence that the fake social security and documents industry is a multi-billion dollar problem, especially when considering the widespread use of fraudulent information for government relief and tax fraud
. While pinning down an exact figure is difficult, reports on pandemic-related fraud and the Social Security Administration's (SSA) earnings suspense file indicate massive financial losses.


Certainly those who excuse illegal entry into the country because they "can't blame any who wish for a better life" won't blame them for voting for the party that welcomed them and promised them all sorts of things.
I think you might be surprised.

Most of the people that fled South and Central American Crap Holes weren't the flotsam and jetsam many think of. A lot of them are, were hard-working family types that spent everything they had to get here. Sold everything they had in order to pay the Cartels to get them across the Border.

They didn't like living under Totalitarian scum down there and they know what totalitarian scum sound like here. They know the words, the phrases, the empty promises, the lies.

They've heard it all before.

Keep in mind Miami, possibly, no -- Probably, the most refugee-saturated area in the Country is the only Major City in the Country with a Republican Mayor.

I hope dimocrap scum/CPUSA do rely on the Illegal Vote. They might be in for a surprise.

Difference is, in Florida we don't really have a Voter Fraud Problem. We WILL lock fraudsters up. We actively pursue Voter fraud. New Yawk Shitty, the scuzziest scumhole on the Planet Earth, actively ENCOURAGES Vote Fraud.

1760803987526.webp


BTW, that Zip Code is in Queens. Scuzzhole City, NYC
 
Sociologist Helmut Schoeck’s observation: “Since the end of the Second World War, however, a new ‘ethic’ has come into being, according to which the envious man is perfectly acceptable. Progressively fewer individuals and groups are ashamed of their envy, but instead make out that its existence in their temperaments axiomatically proves the existence of ‘social injustice,’ which must be eliminated for their benefit.” Helmut Schoeck, “Envy: A Theory of Social Behavior,” p. 179


I have always thought that envy should be acceptable If you use it to better yourself so you can earn more. As opposed to demanding that the gov't arbitrarily redress inequalities so you get more without doing more. I suspect that Mamdani's voters want more without earning it.
 
Many are Non Practicing Ethnic only Jews from a long line of Brooklyn / Bronx / Flushing Queens Marxists dating back to the Sacco & Vanzetti era and the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire . And they have Great Grandparents who boasted about living down the hall in the same building as the Rosenbergs .
Bump for the Confused folks here
 
15th post
cThe last time I was up there it was like a third world country. The people there are stupid and ignorant and can't comprehend basic economics. This is what they deserve.
But why?

The answer shifts the blame: the Democrats/Leftists/Progressives infantilize their constituents.

While you can blame them for not making the decisions and efforts more successful folks make, it is hard to resist the arguement that "it's not your fault that they are doing better than you.....you tried but they are holding you back."

It's that YOLO thing....
 
Those on the streets today are Communists. They would vote Communist. People forget the pain of those regimes. And the kicker is that many of these same peasants will be eliminated as the economy contracts.
A lot of 'em are mindless, and are being paid by the communists to show up and "protest."


AI Overview


Following a report from the conservative Capital Research Center (CRC), the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) under the Trump administration has been investigating George Soros and the Open Society Foundations (OSF) on allegations of funding extremist groups
. The investigations have been widely condemned by civil society groups and legal experts as politically motivated.

Capital Research Center's report
  • In September 2025, the DOJ initiated the investigation based partly on a CRC report that accused OSF of providing $80 million to "pro-terror" groups involved in riots in 2020.
 
Iare Non Practicing Ethnic only Jews from a long line of Brooklyn / Bronx / Flushing Queens Marxists dating back to the Sacco & Vanzetti era and the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire . And they have Great Grandparents who boasted about living down the hall in the same building as the Rosenbergs .

Many are Non Practicing Ethnic only Jews from a long line of Brooklyn / Bronx / Flushing Queens Marxists dating back to the Sacco & Vanzetti era and the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire . And they have Great Grandparents who boasted about living down the hall in the same building as the Rosenbergs .
I'd like to see your documentation.
 
Back
Top Bottom