itfitzme
Silver Member
If the VA model is followed she will get approval for her treatment in two years.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the VA model is followed she will get approval for her treatment in two years.
Hummm..... The fact it says she was "trying" to sign up for ACA suggests that she was not covered by any insurance. If there wasn't any insurance and if there was no ACA she would have not been in any better condition. Had things remained the same she would have been denied coverage due to a pre-existing condition and the end result would have been the same. She would have died.Linda Rolain's enrollment troubles kept her from treatment in January for an aggressive brain tumor, has died.
Woman in class-action lawsuit against Xerox dies | Las Vegas Review-Journal
RolainÂ’s husband, Robert, said the couple began trying to sign up in November, well ahead of the Dec. 15 deadline for January coverage. After wrestling with repeated sign-up problems, the Rolains bought a plan that took effect in March. But they said Xerox staffers miscommunicated the policyÂ’s effective date, so they didnÂ’t know until May that they had coverage.
Linda Rolain was first diagnosed with a brain tumor in early 2014, after a seizure in late 2013. Robert Rolain said in a June 19 news conference at the downtown Las Vegas offices of Callister, Immerman and Associates that his wifeÂ’s care was delayed for months because of their insurance troubles.
Robert Rolain alleges his wifeÂ’s tumor went from treatable in winter to fatal in spring as the couple fought for coverage.
Linda Rolain was admitted to hospice care in early June.
This is SOCIALISM.. Take a good look.
Well first of all, it's not about government because a private company screwed up on the paperwork, not any govt - state or federal. That makes it not about Obamacare. Also, there's no proof that this woman had insurance to begin with. So, if she never had insurance, how is Obamacare to blame for her death?
Another idiot that thinks that a contractor mistake doesn't in any way impact the people that hired the contractor. The next time someone gets sued because a contractor screws up and dumps toxic waste in the water supply I expect you to step in and defend the corporation that hired the contractor.
Actually, I don't.
So....still no proof that she was previously insured and lost her insurance because it didn't meet the minimum standard set by the ACA.
The extent to which you are wrong is only exceeded by the extent to which you don't know you're wrong.
Because, if you hire a contractor that screws up the environment,we know the government will never go after you.
The extent to which you are wrong is so great that it will echo through the entire universe for all eternity.
Your assertion is that capitalists cannot do business with any government or they stop being capitalists. That is absurd.
That would mean that a privately owned caterer would stop being a capitalist enterprise if it agreed to cater a school board luncheon.
No...they paid them to set up the exchanges. Xerox staff missinformed her. Xerox =/= government. In fact it's a publicly traded multinational corporation, the exact opposite of government.
Yeah, we get it, rule number one, the government is never wrong.
Xerox being at fault here means the government is never wrong? Did you put that 'if, then' all together yourself, or did you have to bring in a team of stupidity builders to assist you?
This is so so sad, I bet she wins her lawsuit against Xerox.
And may I ask, would the hospitals and her doctor NOT TREAT HER due to not having Insurance? I've always had insurance so I truly am ignorant on this topic, but even before the ACA, if a person like this woman did not have health care insurance, would hospitals and Doctors actually NOT HELP and not treat this woman's critical medical condition? Can they REFUSE to treat a person who may die without such treatment, unless they have the cash or health insurance? How does it all work if you don't have Insurance with Doctors and Hospitals?
Or due to the high cost of her surgery and treatment needed, her and her husband chose to not have the treatment needed until their Insurance quagmire was settled, because they didn't want to face bankruptcy?
Because, if you hire a contractor that screws up the environment,we know the government will never go after you.
The extent to which you are wrong is so great that it will echo through the entire universe for all eternity.
Your assertion is that capitalists cannot do business with any government or they stop being capitalists. That is absurd.
That would mean that a privately owned caterer would stop being a capitalist enterprise if it agreed to cater a school board luncheon.
I didn't say they stop being capitalists because they do business with the government. I said that anything the government is involved in is not capitalism. Inderstand your confusion though, you actually think we have a fee market.
Yeah, we get it, rule number one, the government is never wrong.
Xerox being at fault here means the government is never wrong? Did you put that 'if, then' all together yourself, or did you have to bring in a team of stupidity builders to assist you?
Like I keep pointing out, the government is happy to hold the people who hire a contractor responsible for any mistakes he makes while under their employment, all I am doing is applying the same standards to them. You, on the other hand, want to pretend the government is not responsible for the mistakes the people it hires makes.
Keep looking stupid though, it suits you.
Just remember... They're calling Xerox the culprit of this evil socialism...This is so so sad, I bet she wins her lawsuit against Xerox.
And may I ask, would the hospitals and her doctor NOT TREAT HER due to not having Insurance? I've always had insurance so I truly am ignorant on this topic, but even before the ACA, if a person like this woman did not have health care insurance, would hospitals and Doctors actually NOT HELP and not treat this woman's critical medical condition? Can they REFUSE to treat a person who may die without such treatment, unless they have the cash or health insurance? How does it all work if you don't have Insurance with Doctors and Hospitals?
Or due to the high cost of her surgery and treatment needed, her and her husband chose to not have the treatment needed until their Insurance quagmire was settled, because they didn't want to face bankruptcy?
Maybe the words of the lawyer actually handling the lawsuit might help:
Callister noted that the lawsuit is not an attack on the Affordable Care Act or the stateÂ’s insurance exchange.
“This has nothing to do with the ACA. This is 100 percent about Xerox, who won the bid from the state of Nevada to create this exchange. And they’ve failed. They absolutely failed,” Callister told the Review-Journal.
Lawsuit Filed Against Nevada Health Exchange « CBS Las Vegas
Because, if you hire a contractor that screws up the environment,we know the government will never go after you.
The extent to which you are wrong is so great that it will echo through the entire universe for all eternity.
Your assertion is that capitalists cannot do business with any government or they stop being capitalists. That is absurd.
That would mean that a privately owned caterer would stop being a capitalist enterprise if it agreed to cater a school board luncheon.
I didn't say they stop being capitalists because they do business with the government. I said that anything the government is involved in is not capitalism. Inderstand your confusion though, you actually think we have a fee market.
Linda Rolain's enrollment troubles kept her from treatment in January for an aggressive brain tumor, has died.
Woman in class-action lawsuit against Xerox dies | Las Vegas Review-Journal
Rolain’s husband, Robert, said the couple began trying to sign up in November, well ahead of the Dec. 15 deadline for January coverage. After wrestling with repeated sign-up problems, the Rolains bought a plan that took effect in March. But they said Xerox staffers miscommunicated the policy’s effective date, so they didn’t know until May that they had coverage.
Linda Rolain was first diagnosed with a brain tumor in early 2014, after a seizure in late 2013. Robert Rolain said in a June 19 news conference at the downtown Las Vegas offices of Callister, Immerman and Associates that his wife’s care was delayed for months because of their insurance troubles.
Robert Rolain alleges his wife’s tumor went from treatable in winter to fatal in spring as the couple fought for coverage.
Linda Rolain was admitted to hospice care in early June.
This is SOCIALISM.. Take a good look.
lol, if conservatives ever had their way with tort reform she or her estate probably wouldn't have been able to sue.
Linda Rolain's enrollment troubles kept her from treatment in January for an aggressive brain tumor, has died.
Woman in class-action lawsuit against Xerox dies | Las Vegas Review-Journal
RolainÂ’s husband, Robert, said the couple began trying to sign up in November, well ahead of the Dec. 15 deadline for January coverage. After wrestling with repeated sign-up problems, the Rolains bought a plan that took effect in March. But they said Xerox staffers miscommunicated the policyÂ’s effective date, so they didnÂ’t know until May that they had coverage.
Linda Rolain was first diagnosed with a brain tumor in early 2014, after a seizure in late 2013. Robert Rolain said in a June 19 news conference at the downtown Las Vegas offices of Callister, Immerman and Associates that his wifeÂ’s care was delayed for months because of their insurance troubles.
Robert Rolain alleges his wifeÂ’s tumor went from treatable in winter to fatal in spring as the couple fought for coverage.
Linda Rolain was admitted to hospice care in early June.
This is SOCIALISM.. Take a good look.
Under the Pre-ACA capitalistic health insurance model, her brain tumor would have made her uninsurable for the rest of her life, with no options at all.
She already had insurance, numskull.
Your assertion is that capitalists cannot do business with any government or they stop being capitalists. That is absurd.
That would mean that a privately owned caterer would stop being a capitalist enterprise if it agreed to cater a school board luncheon.
I didn't say they stop being capitalists because they do business with the government. I said that anything the government is involved in is not capitalism. Inderstand your confusion though, you actually think we have a fee market.
Nobody except you thinks that capitalism and government cannot co-exist.