Witnesses testimony of explosions on 9/11...

[the other mike]

.... where is your evidence.....?

Evidence page

How much do you know? World Trade Center Building 7 was a 47 story skyscraper that was never hit by a plane, yet 'collapsed' on 9/11 after the Twin Towers. Let's examine the evidence...

www1.ae911truth.org

 

[the other mike]

Part 1: NIST and Popular Mechanics Fabricate Myth About WTC 7's 'Scooped-Out' 10 Stories

In its infamous 2005 article, 'Debunking the 9/11 Myths,' Popular Mechanics quoted NIST director Shyam Sunder asserting that falling debris from the North Tower poked a huge 'gouge' in the front of WTC 7.

www.ae911truth.org

 

[Gamolon]

Part 1: NIST and Popular Mechanics Fabricate Myth About WTC 7's 'Scooped-Out' 10 Stories

In its infamous 2005 article, 'Debunking the 9/11 Myths,' Popular Mechanics quoted NIST director Shyam Sunder asserting that falling debris from the North Tower poked a huge 'gouge' in the front of WTC 7.

www.ae911truth.org

AE 9/11 "Truth" is full of liars. I wonder why they did this below? Can anyone guess?

Well isn't that interesting? Back on September 12th, 2018, AE 9/11 had the following ALTERED photo on their site trying to prove molten steel. Looks like they had to "lighten it up" to get more yellows out of it..

Witnesses of Molten Metal at Ground Zero

AE911Truth is a nonprofit organization that represents more than 3,000 architects and engineers who are calling for a new investigation into the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7 on 9/11.

web.archive.org

View attachment 556590

But then, when they got caught lying, they put the real photo up.

Witnesses of Molten Metal at Ground Zero

The following is a compilation of documented eyewitness accounts of molten metal at the World Trade Center. Reports from Direct Eyewitnesses Leslie Robertson, structural engineer for the design of the World Trade Center '[T]hey pulled out the big block of concrete and there was like a little...

www.ae911truth.org

View attachment 556591

 

[Gamolon]

Part 1: NIST and Popular Mechanics Fabricate Myth About WTC 7's 'Scooped-Out' 10 Stories

In its infamous 2005 article, 'Debunking the 9/11 Myths,' Popular Mechanics quoted NIST director Shyam Sunder asserting that falling debris from the North Tower poked a huge 'gouge' in the front of WTC 7.

www.ae911truth.org

So you agree that there WAS damage to the south face of WTC7 caused by falling debris? Thanks for that.

Building 7 Fact 2: – The Gash

Follow along and explore the hard evidence of debris, debris patterns, and video of collapse. This is the type evidence which will be presented to a grand jury if there were to be a new investigati…

wtc7fact.wordpress.com

 

[the other mike]

So you agree that there WAS damage to the south face of WTC7 caused by falling debris? Thanks for that.

Building 7 Fact 2: – The Gash

Follow along and explore the hard evidence of debris, debris patterns, and video of collapse. This is the type evidence which will be presented to a grand jury if there were to be a new investigati…

wtc7fact.wordpress.com

Another strawman argument ?
Who said there was no fire in, or damage to the Solomon Brothers building ?

 

[Gamolon]

Another strawman argument ?
Who said there was no fire in, or damage to the Solomon Brothers building ?

So what point were you trying to get across by posting that article? That there was damage, but the location was wrong?

 

[the other mike]

 

[Gamolon]

So answer the question. What was the point of you posting the AE 9/11 "Truth" article? To point out the actual damage location/size WTC7 suffered from falling debris?

 

[the other mike]

So answer the question. What was the point of you posting the AE 9/11 "Truth" article? To point out the actual damage location/size WTC7 suffered from falling debris?

I post a lot of articles.
Do you know me on any other sites ?

AE 9/11 "Truth" is full of liars.

Why would they be lying ?

 

[Gamolon]

I post a lot of articles.
Do you know me on any other sites ?

Why would they be lying ?

What was the point of you posting the AE 9/11 "Truth article about the damage from falling debris? Or did you just read the title and not the actual article?

I bet that's it.

They lie to keep idiots like you believing what they say to keep money rolling in. Gage even admitted as much in one of his posts begging for money because AE 9/11 "Truth" voted him out of a job and he now has no income.

 

[the other mike]

voted him out of a job and he now has no income.

Telling the truth will wreck you. Ask Snowden and Assange.

 

[Gamolon]

Part 1: NIST and Popular Mechanics Fabricate Myth About WTC 7's 'Scooped-Out' 10 Stories

In its infamous 2005 article, 'Debunking the 9/11 Myths,' Popular Mechanics quoted NIST director Shyam Sunder asserting that falling debris from the North Tower poked a huge 'gouge' in the front of WTC 7.

www.ae911truth.org

Again, for all the kids.

What was your purpose for posting this article? Was it to show the actual damage location/size in WTC7 caused by falling debris?

 

[Gamolon]

Telling the truth will wreck you. Ask Snowden and Assange.

Gage told the truth about COVID?

 

[the other mike]

Off to see the wizard

 

[Gamolon]

Off to see the wizard

I thought it was thermite that brought the towers down?

Why do you keep changing your story?

 

[Gamolon]

Off to see the wizard

Or was it fusion devices? They all can't be true dumbass!!!

I believe you're right about them being cargo planes, and I believe they were each loaded with fusion devices or whatever it was that was used to melt the steel.

 

[the other mike]

I thought it was thermite that brought the towers down?

Why do you keep changing your story?

I see. Now we're back to "But thermite doesn't explode..." Same ol talking points.

Part 5: Denial and Cognitive Dissonance

Editor’s Note: Frances Shure, M.A., L.P.C., has performed an in-depth analysis addressing a key issue of our time: “Why Do Good People Become Silent — or Worse — About 9/11?” The resulting essay, being presented here as a series, is a synthesis of both academic research and clinical...

www.ae911truth.org

Humans resort to denial to avoid the anxiety that accompanies cognitive dissonance — that uncomfortable, sometimes disturbing feeling of losing our emotional equilibrium when we are faced with new information that challenges our worldview or when we hold beliefs that contradict known facts. The discomfort motivates us to change our behavior, change our cognition, and/or justify our behavior by acquiring a secondary cognition. This dynamic is common to us all.

 

[Gamolon]

I see. Now we're back to "But thermite doesn't explode..." Same ol talking points.

Yes we are. You just post shit no matter if it's true or not. As long as it supports a conspiracy.

Thermite, explosives fusion devices. Take your pick Angelo. They can't all be true!!!

 

[the other mike]

Waiting to be rescued....

then ...."Fuuuuuck!!"

 

[Gamolon]

Waiting to be rescued....
View attachment 560241
then ...."Fuuuuuck!!"
View attachment 560242

Did fusion devices cause that collapse? Or maybe explosives? Thermite? Maybe you should add small tactical nukes? Space beams?