Witness who saw the towers collapse on 9/11.

Mayor Giuliani knows and they're about to push him hard enough to spill the beans on everything they better be careful what they wish for..... he might go on The Joe Rogan podcast and overturn the whole apple cart.🤩
 
And by 'gate keepers', you mean pointing out the laughable holes in your conspiracy?

For example, Thermite is blindingly bright. It can damage your eyes if you look directly at it. Half of the weight bearing structures of the WTC 1 and 2 were on the outside of the building.....visible to open air. If Thermite were used to 'cut' them, it would have lit up like a bonfire, damaging the eyesight of anyone who looked directly at it.

Yet.....there wasn't a single thermite reaction ever seen

Thermite generates its own oxygen, so its very difficult to put out. Which means that thermite reactions would have been burning in the debris.

Yet.....not a single thermite reaction was ever found after. Not before. Not during. Not in the months after.

How does your conspiracy address these theory killing holes? By avoiding them and trying to change the topic. Which is why its hard to take you seriously.

Not sure of the thermite theory, but if one wanted to bring down a building, they would NOT put the charges on the outside.
They would put it in the inside, after taking off the insulating, fireproof foam. Only on the inside, could thermite be placed in actual contact with the steel beams, which is essential.
So then no one would have seen anything.

And yes, there was "burning debris" that continued to burn weeks after the WTC collapsed. They were still finding red hot metals when they demolished the building, months later.
 
Military grade nanothermite .... look it up Sinbad.

{...
Nano-thermite or super-thermite is a metastable intermolecular composite (MIC) characterized by a particle size of its main constituents, a metal and a metal oxide, under 100 nanometers. This allows for high and customizable reaction rates. Nano-thermites contain an oxidizer and a reducing agent, which are intimately mixed on the nanometer scale. MICs, including nano-thermitic materials, are a type of reactive materials investigated for military use, as well as for general applications involving propellants, explosives, and pyrotechnics.

What distinguishes MICs from traditional thermites is that the oxidizer and a reducing agent, normally iron oxide and aluminium, are in the form of extremely fine powders (nanoparticles). This dramatically increases the reactivity relative to micrometre-sized powder thermite. As the mass transport mechanisms that slow down the burning rates of traditional thermites are not so important at these scales, the reaction proceeds much more quickly.
...}


Higher temperatures and faster combustion would not turn materials into powders, but if metal, into a liquid.
 
Not sure of the thermite theory, but if one wanted to bring down a building, they would NOT put the charges on the outside.
They would put it in the inside, after taking off the insulating, fireproof foam. Only on the inside, could thermite be placed in actual contact with the steel beams, which is essential.
So then no one would have seen anything.

And yes, there was "burning debris" that continued to burn weeks after the WTC collapsed. They were still finding red hot metals when they demolished the building, months later.
At this point I'm beginning to believe that the truth really is a threat to National Security.

Even on Twitter the truth about the 2020 election and covid-19 and Hunters bs , Epstein....pale in comparison to if this truth came out and that's why people like Julian Assange will never be on Twitter again...
 
Last edited:
{...
Nano-thermite or super-thermite is a metastable intermolecular composite (MIC) characterized by a particle size of its main constituents, a metal and a metal oxide, under 100 nanometers. This allows for high and customizable reaction rates. Nano-thermites contain an oxidizer and a reducing agent, which are intimately mixed on the nanometer scale. MICs, including nano-thermitic materials, are a type of reactive materials investigated for military use, as well as for general applications involving propellants, explosives, and pyrotechnics.

What distinguishes MICs from traditional thermites is that the oxidizer and a reducing agent, normally iron oxide and aluminium, are in the form of extremely fine powders (nanoparticles). This dramatically increases the reactivity relative to micrometre-sized powder thermite. As the mass transport mechanisms that slow down the burning rates of traditional thermites are not so important at these scales, the reaction proceeds much more quickly.
...}


Higher temperatures and faster combustion would not turn materials into powders, but if metal, into a liquid.


Thermite doesn't explode, it burns so brightly it can permanently damage your eyes if you look directly at it.

Half the load bearing beams of the WTC 1 and 2 were on the outside of the building. If those beams were being melted by 'nano-thermite', where were the thousands upon thousands of blinding thermite reactions?

We didn't see even one on 911. Not before, not during, not after. And your conspiracy requires 10s of thousands.

Your explanation is just silly, overly complicated and poorly thought through.
 
It was literally the perfect controlled demolition in that nobody knows it was a controlled demolition ..... never ceases to amaze me.

The evil forces definitely get an
A + this time.

Everyone knows it was not a controlled demolition



It never ceases to amaze me how childish little punks like you lack the maturity to admit when you are proven wrong

You just keep lying like a little weasel
 
Hundreds of demolition rigs and none ever showed up in the pile of debris.
100s ?
We know that each twin tower had 47 box columns, which means there will probably at least 188 of them.

But if you really want to have a serious discussion or debate about any of it you can go back through the 56 pages (of this thread alone )and answer any one of my questions for a change instead of asking your disingenuous redundant ones.
 
100s ?
We know that each twin tower had 47 box columns, which means there will probably at least 188 of them.

But if you really want to have a serious discussion or debate about any of it you can go back through the 56 pages (of this thread alone )and answer any one of my questions for a change instead of asking your disingenuous redundant ones.

Hundreds, maybe thousands?

So where are the rigs?
 

Forum List

Back
Top