Witness who saw the towers collapse on 9/11.

[the other mike]

your videos and claims are as idiotic as the guy eating a banana

 

[Soupnazi630]

View attachment 588476

You claioms are idiotic and disproven by evidence and you know it

 

[the other mike]

You claims are idiotic and disproven by evidence and you know it

Or are they ?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Or are they ?
View attachment 588527

They are disproven by evidence and you now this is true.

You cannot post evidence or any logical coherent argument.

You are a loser and a second rate ass clown.

 

[the other mike]

All three towers collapsed by controlled demolition on 9/11 .

Let's see how the truth deniers and trolls respond to my new approach, without the usual diversion and disruption tactics. Record I'm posting this in conspiracy theories because I know the administrators are required to anyway. You're welcome moderators. Once you become aware as many of us...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Soupnazi630]

All three towers collapsed by controlled demolition on 9/11 .

Let's see how the truth deniers and trolls respond to my new approach, without the usual diversion and disruption tactics. Record I'm posting this in conspiracy theories because I know the administrators are required to anyway. You're welcome moderators. Once you become aware as many of us...

www.usmessageboard.com

All three towers collapsed by controlled demolition on 9/11 .

Let's see how the truth deniers and trolls respond to my new approach, without the usual diversion and disruption tactics. Record I'm posting this in conspiracy theories because I know the administrators are required to anyway. You're welcome moderators. Once you become aware as many of us...

www.usmessageboard.com

All posted before and alll debunked disproven and taken apart.

Nothing proves you are defeated and a loser than repeating yourself and linking to earlier failures.

Grow the fuck up boy you are beaten

 

[the other mike]

Grow the fuck up boy you are beaten

The dark side won ?

 

[Soupnazi630]

The dark side won ?

No and that would be your side

 

[Gamolon]

The dark side won ?

You think 2/3 free fall equals zero resistance!

How can your "dark side" have won anything with idiotic thinking like this?

 

[Gamolon]

All three towers collapsed by controlled demolition on 9/11 .

Let's see how the truth deniers and trolls respond to my new approach, without the usual diversion and disruption tactics. Record I'm posting this in conspiracy theories because I know the administrators are required to anyway. You're welcome moderators. Once you become aware as many of us...

www.usmessageboard.com

Debunked how many times already?

 

[Stryder50]

Blithering nonsense.

There's no structure in the building that could have stopped the collapse once it began. The building transfered gravity load AROUND the floors through perfectly aligned vertical columns shunting that load into bedrock.

When the floors began impacting, it was floor to floor and utterly haphazard. You had structural steel colliding with floor trusses designed to support their own weight and that of say, people and desks. Not the gravity loads of dozens of stories of falling structural steel. They would have collapsed almost instantly.

Then there's GRAVITY, accelerating the debris field of dozens of floors of structural steel before they impact with the floor below. Radically increasing the forces each floor was subject to with the debris field. An increase that would have kept on increasing as the debris field accelerated.

Worse still, there's impulse....the performance of a material under quick sudden forces rather than measured, consistent forces. Structural steel has a MUCH lower load bearing capacity when subject to sudden forces than it does consistent ones. About a third less. And dozens of stories of falling structural steel accelerated by gravity are both powerful and sudden.

Finally, each floor that collapsed ADDED mass to the debris field. So you have MORE mass, MORE acceleration under gravity....while each floor truss had a static amount of resistence it could offer, which was utterly insuffecient for even ONE floor collapsing on top of it, let alone dozens, let alone dozens accelerated by gravity.

Once the first floor fell, there's literally nothing that could have stopped the collapse all the way to the ground. Instead, the collapse would have accelerated under gravity, adding more mass with each floor until it finally stopped when it collided with the ground.

Which is exactly what we saw.

One interesting 'footnote' I recall which adds to your excellent explanation above (post #14) is that the outer steel lattice framework carried most of the weight of the buildings(towers) and the floors were slab construct held by "pin" like shelf lips in place. Similar to what you find with many flat pack bookcases where you put those pin tabs into the predrilled holes on the side panels to support the shelves.

One the outer steel frame was heated enough for the steel to soften and flex~bow, tension of weight above making them bow outward would pull those support (shelf) pins out from under the slab floors and they would begin to fall. As one floor fell into and impacted the one below, that would further the out spread of the exterior frame and let loose that lower floor. Becomes like a chain of dominos and the out steel frame starts to peel away like a banana skin.

Gravity accelerates the process ...

 

[the other mike]

One interesting 'footnote' I recall which adds to your excellent explanation above (post #14) is that the outer steel lattice framework carried most of the weight of the buildings(towers) and the floors were slab construct held by "pin" like shelf lips in place. Similar to what you find with many flat pack bookcases where you put those pin tabs into the predrilled holes on the side panels to support the shelves.

One the outer steel frame was heated enough for the steel to soften and flex~bow, tension of weight above making them bow outward would pull those support (shelf) pins out from under the slab floors and they would begin to fall. As one floor fell into and impacted the one below, that would further the out spread of the exterior frame and let loose that lower floor. Becomes like a chain of dominos and the out steel frame starts to peel away like a banana skin.

Gravity accelerates the process ...

Liar.
Each twin had 47 massive inner core columns.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Liar.
Each twin had 47 massive inner core columns.

You are the liar.

Having those columns does NOT mean those columns were the primary load bearing members

 

[Gamolon]

Liar.
Each twin had 47 massive inner core columns.

Not this garbage again!

Your structural knowledge of the towers sucks. They were not the same massive columns from top to bottom. They got smaller the higher up they went.

No wonder you think it was demolition!

Here's one small clue. The floor connections at the core columns and perimeter façade failed. Get the picture yet dopey?

 

[Gamolon]

One interesting 'footnote' I recall which adds to your excellent explanation above (post #14) is that the outer steel lattice framework carried most of the weight of the buildings(towers) and the floors were slab construct held by "pin" like shelf lips in place. Similar to what you find with many flat pack bookcases where you put those pin tabs into the predrilled holes on the side panels to support the shelves.

One the outer steel frame was heated enough for the steel to soften and flex~bow, tension of weight above making them bow outward would pull those support (shelf) pins out from under the slab floors and they would begin to fall. As one floor fell into and impacted the one below, that would further the out spread of the exterior frame and let loose that lower floor. Becomes like a chain of dominos and the out steel frame starts to peel away like a banana skin.

Gravity accelerates the process ...

 

[Gamolon]

One interesting 'footnote' I recall which adds to your excellent explanation above (post #14) is that the outer steel lattice framework carried most of the weight of the buildings(towers) and the floors were slab construct held by "pin" like shelf lips in place. Similar to what you find with many flat pack bookcases where you put those pin tabs into the predrilled holes on the side panels to support the shelves.

One the outer steel frame was heated enough for the steel to soften and flex~bow, tension of weight above making them bow outward would pull those support (shelf) pins out from under the slab floors and they would begin to fall. As one floor fell into and impacted the one below, that would further the out spread of the exterior frame and let loose that lower floor. Becomes like a chain of dominos and the out steel frame starts to peel away like a banana skin.

Gravity accelerates the process ...

Poor Mikey doesn't understand floor connections being one of the weak links here.

 

[Dayton3]

The second plane impacted around the middle of the north tower....the core columns upward resistance would have caused the upper section to fall toward that weakest side , not continue accellerating straight down, as we all saw on film.

The second plane hit the South Tower. And the South Tower was then the first to collapse given it was hit a lot lower.

If you can't get basic facts right then why should your conspiracy theories be taken seriously?

 

[the other mike]

The second plane hit the South Tower. And the South Tower was then the first to collapse given it was hit a lot lower.

If you can't get basic facts right then why should your conspiracy theories be taken seriously?

It's a common error confusing the two towers, and I've referenced it the other way around .

My main argument is that the towers were wired to go down before any planes hit.....

 

[Dayton3]

It's a common error confusing the two towers, and I've referenced it the other way around .

My main argument is that the towers were wired to go down before any planes hit.

Except there is not the slightest bit of evidence to support that claim whatsoever.

 

[the other mike]

Except there is not the slightest bit of evidence to support that claim whatsoever.

Lots of evidence unless you disregard basic
physics and the laws of motion.