RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
That’s your post.Who is defending him?Who?Is anyone defending Floyd’s killer?Is anyone defending Holte's killer?
Yes.
Are you new around here?
Post #37
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s your post.Who is defending him?Who?Is anyone defending Floyd’s killer?Is anyone defending Holte's killer?
Yes.
Are you new around here?
Post #37
No. I don't see that. Not in this thread"so fkn what? a criminal is dead"
You don't see messages like this around here?
That’s your post.Who is defending him?Who?Is anyone defending Floyd’s killer?Is anyone defending Holte's killer?
Yes.
Are you new around here?
Post #37
You mean like this...That’s your post.Who is defending him?Who?Is anyone defending Floyd’s killer?Is anyone defending Holte's killer?
Yes.
Are you new around here?
Post #37
With a quote...
Let's get back to the TOPIC. The media is going apeshit over the Floyd killing, which they must have known would spark riots, just like KTLA did with Rodney King.
At the same time, they are cricket silent on the Holte killing.
Why are media so selective in the divisive issues? Because there is an agenda to feed.Let's get back to the TOPIC. The media is going apeshit over the Floyd killing, which they must have known would spark riots, just like KTLA did with Rodney King.
At the same time, they are cricket silent on the Holte killing.
Divisive issues get people's attention.
So they're doing this just for ratings ? You think ?Divisive issues get people's attention.
You mean like this...That’s your post.Who is defending him?Who?Is anyone defending Floyd’s killer?Is anyone defending Holte's killer?
Yes.
Are you new around here?
Post #37
With a quote...
“With a quote”
Why are media so selective in the divisive issues? Because there is an agenda to feed.Let's get back to the TOPIC. The media is going apeshit over the Floyd killing, which they must have known would spark riots, just like KTLA did with Rodney King.
At the same time, they are cricket silent on the Holte killing.
Divisive issues get people's attention.
I could write a line with quotes and say someone else wrote it. What’s more, one example is not convincing. Who is defending the cop?You mean like this...That’s your post.Who is defending him?Who?Is anyone defending Floyd’s killer?Is anyone defending Holte's killer?
Yes.
Are you new around here?
Post #37
With a quote...
“With a quote”
You seem confused. I'll try saying this again, slower.
I'm quoting someone else.
Quotation marks look like this " "
The thing you see in quotation marks is what someone ELSE said.
That quote is provided for you in post #37.
Do you understand?
No I don't. Perhaps I would understand, if you say what you mean, instead of playing some kind of weird word games. You got a point to make ? Spit it out, in as few words as possible.You seem confused. I'll try saying this again, slower.
I'm quoting someone else.
Quotation marks look like this " "
The thing you see in quotation marks is what someone ELSE said.
That quote is provided for you in post #37.
Do you understand?
I could write a line with quotes and say someone else wrote it. What’s more, one example is not convincing. Who is defending the cop?You mean like this...That’s your post.Who is defending him?Who?Is anyone defending Floyd’s killer?Is anyone defending Holte's killer?
Yes.
Are you new around here?
Post #37
With a quote...
“With a quote”
You seem confused. I'll try saying this again, slower.
I'm quoting someone else.
Quotation marks look like this " "
The thing you see in quotation marks is what someone ELSE said.
That quote is provided for you in post #37.
Do you understand?
No I don't. Perhaps I would understand, if you say what you mean, instead of playing some kind of weird word games. You got a point to make ? Spit it out, in as few words as possible.You seem confused. I'll try saying this again, slower.
I'm quoting someone else.
Quotation marks look like this " "
The thing you see in quotation marks is what someone ELSE said.
That quote is provided for you in post #37.
Do you understand?
That's what I'm still wondering. He said "people" are, but he's not saying WHO these so-called "people" are.I could write a line with quotes and say someone else wrote it. What’s more, one example is not convincing. Who is defending the cop?
That's what I'm still wondering. He said "people" are, but he's not saying WHO these so-called "people" are.I could write a line with quotes and say someone else wrote it. What’s more, one example is not convincing. Who is defending the cop?
I'm completely lost on everything you're saying. Seems like you said people were defending Floyd's killer. Well, who the hell are these "people" ?That post wasn't directed at you.
I'm completely lost on everything you're saying. Seems like you said people were defending Floyd's killer. Well, who the hell are these "people" ?That post wasn't directed at you.
OK, so some people are defending the cop. Whatever. Now can we get back to the TOPIC of this thread, please ? (as posted in Post # 44)People on this site. That quote was pulled from here.
Because of ass clowns like Pendleton, YOU GET COPS USING TOO MUCH FORCE, you cocksucking dolt.Why do Conservatives suck at equivalencies?
Was Officer Holte, handcuffed and under the control of four public servants sworn to protect and serve?