leftwinger
Diamond Member
The ballots still get checked for validity.
Almost comical. 100s of thousands SIG checks as fast as they would load by Marxist plants that got into the review chair discovered in AZ.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The ballots still get checked for validity.
It will make it a lot harder to harvest ballots but I'm putting my money on the blue team. They will find a way to work around this and be able to harvest thousands and thousands of ballots.This will put a hitch in their get along. They can still flood the election from the inflated voter rolls. It just won't be as easy. Good decision.
"Finally common sense prevails in the state of Wisconsin and hopefully it will help keep the 2024 election more secure in this blue state."
Wisconsin Supreme Court BANS use of absentee ballot drop boxes in big election ruling
The state of Wisconsin will no longer be able to use absentee ballot drop boxes as they did three years using COVID as an excuse. The conservative majority of the state’s high court ruled tha…therightscoop.com
I said nothing about cheating. What with you? Paranoid much?So you're encouraging cheating.
No surprise.
You are welcome. Glad I could clarify that for those that think a precedent is a precedent is a precedent, just because they didn't like high school civics, so they blew it off. It makes some of them sound like Trumpers or other typical on the street people interviewed and quizzed on the street by Late night hosts, for the rest of us to laugh at.Thanks Einstein.
I have never seen a need for the drop box thing.But, but, but, de blacks can't get to the PO!
Never mind that they can have the mailman pick their outgoing mail....You know, like everybody else can.
Drop boxes was the dumbest idea ever....Unless the intent all along was to fill them with harvested or faux ballots.
I have no problem with people that do not want to stand in line on a specific day, no matter the weather, or other commitments. I do care about proper verification of ballots sent in, but that is about it. Personally, I always early vote, in person, so I can avoid standing in long lines ( though in good shape myself, some people simply cannot for a variety of reasons), avoid weather, avoid germ ridden crowds in November, vote on my own schedule within a few weeks of election, but that is just me.For specific reason and only a very small list.
Not because your at home too damn lazy to go vote.
You should move there and see if you can make a difference, otherwise the conservative US Supreme Court says you have no legal standing to bitch and should therefore shut up. But hey, you know how the Supreme Court is.Almost comical. 100s of thousands SIG checks as fast as they would load by Marxist plants that got into the review chair discovered in AZ.
Mail in votes without iron clad means to stop voter Fraud is a sure fire way to cheating.I have no problem with people that do not want to stand in line on a specific day, no matter the weather, or other commitments. I do care about proper verification of ballots sent in, but that is about it. Personally, I always early vote, in person, so I can avoid standing in long lines ( though in good shape myself, some people simply cannot for a variety of reasons), avoid weather, avoid germ ridden crowds in November, vote on my own schedule within a few weeks of election, but that is just me.
Actually I do know and found out when reading to the comments in the article. I was going to see if anyone else caught it.July of 22 this ruling was made. But you cannot expect Lasty to know that, he just copies and paste what is in his talking points emails.
I think all states should have "iron clad" means to stop voter fraud on absentee ballots, as well as at the polls, yet every election, we see people charged and convicted. It is usually very small numbers across many states, no pattern or party preference prevalent, never enough to change a precinct, county, state or presidential race. Still, I think it worthy of the investment in technological and other oversite measures to make it secure, and I do think it is possible.Mail in votes without iron clad means to stop voter Fraud is a sure fire way to cheating.
Kiss principle works fine. Show id and signature verify. No one handles your ballot and you put in scanner yourself.I think all states should have "iron clad" means to stop voter fraud on absentee ballots, as well as at the polls, yet every election, we see people charged and convicted. It is usually very small numbers across many states, no pattern or party preference prevalent, never enough to change a precinct, county, state or presidential race. Still, I think it worthy of the investment in technological and other oversite measures to make it secure, and I do think it is possible.
We do it that way here, for in person voting, plus the one you show your ID to verifies you are in the official book, registered as eligible to vote. Again, none of that is what the Supreme Court of Wisconsin or this thread was speaking to. Did some state announce a new method for in person verification this week? You should start a thread about it sometime.Kiss principle works fine. Show id and signature verify. No one handles your ballot and you put in scanner yourself.
How its done here
Mybl position is massive mail in votinf will lead to fraud.We do it that way here, for in person voting, plus the one you show your ID to verifies you are in the official book, registered as eligible to vote. Again, none of that is what the Supreme Court of Wisconsin or this thread was speaking to. Did some state announce a new method for in person verification this week? You should start a thread about it sometime.
And it's an old ruling from the previous court.Do you have trouble maintaining a line of logic or thought of any nature? This is about Wisconsin and a recent ruling from their Supreme Court, that only effects Wisconsin and Wisconsin voters.
Has the new court overturned it?And it's an old ruling from the previous court.
Not yet.Has the new court overturned it?
So you too want to make easier to defraud and then claim it is not going on. You have no argument.Not yet.