Wisconsin Supreme Court BANS use of absentee ballot drop boxes

[otto105]

So you too want to make easier to defraud and then claim it is not going on. You have no argument.

Just how would it be easier to defraud? You still have signatures.

 

[Lastamender]

Just how would it be easier to defraud? You still have signatures.

Because of inflated voter rolls and the ability to cull the votes needed from it. We know that is what goes on.

 

[otto105]

Because of inflated voter rolls and the ability to cull the votes needed from it. We know that is what goes on.

You don't know shit as voter fraud is extremely rare.

Also, what are inflated voter rolls? And culling claims now.

Hilarious

 

[Lastamender]

You don't know shit as voter fraud is extremely rare.

Also, what are inflated voter rolls? And culling claims now.

Hilarious

It is not rare. It is never investigated. The eligible voters in WI. equals 4.3 million. Their voter rolls have 7 million.

 

[otto105]

It is not rare. It is never investigated. The eligible voters in WI. equals 4.3 million. Their voter rolls have 7 million.

It is very rare.

Also, where in the fuck do you put numbers from? Your ass?

 

[Lastamender]

It is very rare.

Also, where in the fuck do you put numbers from? Your ass?

That came out at a disbarment hearing for John Eastman. A former WI. Supreme court justice said it after his investigations found that outrageous and fraudulent difference.

 

[Lastamender]

BPRO CONNECTIONS TO VARIOUS EXTERNAL DATABASES


Not only is TotalVote being used illegally in elections, the system is also connected to a variety of federal and statewide databases, including Geographic Information System (GIS) (to geolocate voters), National Change of Address (NCOA) database, American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA), Dept of Motor Vehicles (DMV), Social Security Information (SSA), Electronic Registration Information Center, Inc. (ERIC), Dept of Health (DOH), and other miscellaneous data bases that contain information on US citizens eligible to vote, depending on the state-specific implementation.

Further research led to the following discoveries of foreign nationals listed as Executives of BPro, Inc. of Pierre, SD. BPro’s employee directory is available here, from which the following are individuals are noteworthy:

• Vladyslav Pelekh – Chief Executive Officer of BPro, Inc., Pierre, SD. LOCATED: Kiev, Ukraine
• Vladyslav Ryaboklyach – Tendering Manager of BPro, Inc., Pierre, SD. LOCATED: Kiev, Ukraine
• Alexey Krnaukhov – Project Coordinator of BPro, Inc., Pierre, SD. LOCATED: Ukraine
• Tyhama Qlyshi – Senior Frontend Developer of BPro, Inc., Pierre, SD. LOCATED: Homs, Syria
• Sergio Shakhov – Employee of BPro, Inc., Pierre, SD. LOCATED: Ukraine
• Abhishek Paswan – Employee of BPro, Inc., Pierre, SD. LOCATED: Gorakhpur, Haryana, India
• Kuldeep Jio – Employee of BPro, Inc., Pierre, SD. LOCATED: Pithoragarh, Uttarakhand, India.

What the fuck are these people even doing in our elections?

The Spider in the Web of 2020 Election Fraud - AFNN

The election management system is at the very heart of election integrity concerns in several states and needs significant change.

afnn.us

 

[Lastamender]

Just how would it be easier to defraud? You still have signatures.

The signatures no one else can see but election officials? That proves nothing except the election officials do not want their work checked. Something very wrong there.

 

[postman]

Fine. Mail it in. Big deal. Let the US Postal Service deliver it to the clerk's office with the rest of the mail.

The irony of that. The drop boxes had a chain of custody. The post office can't even guarantee it will be delivered within a week of when you mailed it.

 

[bdtex]

It all depends on who checks the validity.

No it doesn't.

 

[Lastamender]

No it doesn't.

It sure does. You want integrity let someone independent check their work. Why they refuse to allow that is obvious.

 

[there4eyeM]

Democracy is not worth the effort of going to vote? Accommodating laziness is not an obligation of a democracy and is not good for a republic. A citizen who is unwilling to exercise a trifle in order to protect and affirm our hard-fought freedoms is one whose vote the society can well do without. There are obvious and easily dealt-with exceptions and there is no need to enter into long discourse on the details. Look around and see how many nations handle importance elections in the manner proposed.

 

[postman]

The signatures no one else can see but election officials? That proves nothing except the election officials do not want their work checked. Something very wrong there.

Who would you trust with your SIGNATURE?

 

[postman]

It sure does. You want integrity let someone independent check their work. Why they refuse to allow that is obvious.

What independent company do you trust with copies of your signature.

 

[postman]

Democracy is not worth the effort of going to vote? Accommodating laziness is not an obligation of a democracy and is not good for a republic. A citizen who is unwilling to exercise a trifle in order to protect and affirm our hard-fought freedoms is one whose vote the society can well do without.

You don't want to limit the franchise to a few "dedicated" individuals. Whose opinions may not be shared by those who didn't bother to vote.

 

[White 6]

The irony of that. The drop boxes had a chain of custody. The post office can't even guarantee it will be delivered within a week of when you mailed it.

I have no problem getting a letter across town in 2 days here.

 

[Lastamender]

Who would you trust with your SIGNATURE?

You mean who have I trusted? I guess that would be any waiter or waitress. It would be store clerks checking my signature on a credit or debit card. Any doctors office or any service where I sign my name. You?

 

[Lastamender]

What independent company do you trust with copies of your signature.

Is my bank independent or does Tommy own it?

 

[otto105]

The signatures no one else can see but election officials? That proves nothing except the election officials do not want their work checked. Something very wrong there.

So, everyone is dishonest is your answer. Maybe it’s just you maga fuckups and your urge for power.

 

[otto105]

The signatures no one else can see but election officials? That proves nothing except the election officials do not want their work checked. Something very wrong there.

Additionally, both parties have election observers and ballots are checked by multiple people.