WINNING!!!!! DOW up over 2000 points in one day

That is not actually a reply about my posting from CNN days back. I said I posted it and you called me out. I was really called a liar and today I posted it again. You never saw my first post you claim. But I know damned well I had earlier, days ago, posted the CNN article you now want credit for. That article is what you kept acting like I lied in fact that you never read until i posted it again today. I don't recall you posting it earlier.
 
Targeting means what bob.

One doesn't use buckshot to hunt deer.
Here is the main point.

You won't be able to keep changing the topic.
Biden collected far more tariffs from China than Trump had collected.
It has been proven here. I proved it.
 
I guess that sounds pretty good if your short term memory is so impaired you forgot that the market was down 20% compared to when he started this nonsense.

That would be pretty consistent with the attention span of most of MAGA.
MAGA is your intellectual Superior.
 
Now down 2000.
Almost ALL gains lost in ONE session.
Blaster claims he bought on the dip, but reality will show he was late to the party and bought after yesterdays gains, and is suffering huge loses today.
I can't remember which economist said it but a few days ago he said don't let the down turn fool you into buying stocks because you were going to get burnt. Some people just didn't listen yesterday and got burnt and some made a ton of money.
 
Here is the main point.

You won't be able to keep changing the topic.
Biden collected far more tariffs from China than Trump had collected.
It has been proven here. I proved it.
Well then, where's the proof?
 
Well then, where's the proof?
Robert W has no proof.

He just copies what I said, then tries to take credit.

Hey Robert W
All you really need to do is copy the post and link it to this thread.
Quit saying you posted it earlier, prove it my directing us to the post with a link.

Here is the main point.

You won't be able to keep changing the topic.
Biden collected far more tariffs from China than Trump had collected.
It has been proven here. I proved it.
Where?
Link Please.
 
What AI are you using?
Do you even know?
You think ChatGPT is based on LIES?
Do you realize that ChatGPT is AI? Or NOT?
GIGO still applies to AI.
 
Told to us by the actual voice of experience. What is pathetic is taking your anger out on his wife.
.

They feel this is the most valid way they can insult President Trump.

He is bulletproof.

1744313203869.webp



.
 
What AI are you using?
Do you even know?
You think ChatGPT is based on LIES?
Do you realize that ChatGPT is AI? Or NOT?
Google includes it for me. I will see if I can see what their source is.
I think ChatGTP is harder for me to use than what I get for free from Google.
Have I called it lies? I don't believe I have said that. I do realize ChatGPT is AI. I never said otherwise.

Google AI is a division of Google dedicated to artificial intelligence.<a href="Google AI - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a> It was announced at Google I/O 2017 by CEO Sundar Pichai.<a href="Google AI - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a>

This division has expanded its reach with research facilities in various parts of the world such as Zurich, Paris, Israel, and Beijing.<a href="Google AI - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a> In 2023, Google AI was part of the reorganization initiative that elevated its head, Jeff Dean, to the position of chief scientist at Google.<a href="Google AI - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>4<span>]</span></a> This reorganization involved the merging of Google Brain and DeepMind, a UK-based company that Google acquired in 2014 that operated separately from the company's core research.<a href="Google AI - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>5<span>]</span></a>
 
@Robert W has no proof.

He just copies what I said, then tries to take credit.

Hey @Robert W
All you really need to do is copy the post and link it to this thread.
Quit saying you posted it earlier, prove it my directing us to the post with a link.
What a fool you are. Now you want credit for the post I first posted. That you agree with. What are you fighting about if as you claim now you agree with me and you allege you agreed first. How can that be true for you keep fighting me?

The article you claim you posted first (which is not true) agrees with me and now you say with you too!!! Meaning you agree with me.
 
Where?
Link Please.
Show us your proof that Trump collected more from China. You have protested you provided the proof but you claim you did it first. Why you want to claim that makes no sense since the article you now want credit for proves I am correct and you claim it also is correct that you posted it.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom