Wind Power, is Germany waking up to no lights on?

The Earth has been warming since the end of the Little Ice Age.
True but it was warming even before that.
1700094347609.webp
 
You don't have any warming. Warming on Earth is about net land moving out of the 600 miles to the pole zone. That's not happening, and hence Earth is not warming.
The planet has been warming since the end of the last glacial period like it always does following a glacial period. Been going on for 3 million years.

glacial cycles.gif

glacial cycles.webp

ocean temperature.webp

glacial mininum and interglacial maximum.webp

F2.large.webp

1673744930146.webp
 
The planet has been warming since the end of the last glacial period like it always does following a glacial period. Been going on for 3 million years.

View attachment 1201399
View attachment 1201400
View attachment 1201402
View attachment 1201401
View attachment 1201403
View attachment 1201404




 
You are a moron.
 
I'm more interested in your energy destroying claims.
The argument that widespread use of solar power leads to cooling is linked to replacing fossil fuels which produces warming. If you believe fossil fuels produce warming, then you must believe replacing fossil fuels with solar will lead to cooling because fossil fuels won't be warming the planet.
 
The argument that widespread use of solar power leads to cooling is linked to replacing fossil fuels which produces warming. If you believe fossil fuels produce warming, then you must believe replacing fossil fuels with solar will lead to cooling because fossil fuels won't be warming the planet.

Your silly claim mentioned a reduction of photons, not a reduction of fossil fuels.

If we burn the same amount of fossil fuels but add thousands of square miles of solar panels, will that cool the planet?
 
Your silly claim mentioned a reduction of photons, not a reduction of fossil fuels.

If we burn the same amount of fossil fuels but add thousands of square miles of solar panels, will that cool the planet?
We've been discussing waste heat for awhile now.

Are you familiar with net zero?
 
  1. 40 to 44% of solar radiation striking solar panels is in the visible light spectrum.
  2. 15 to 20% of visible light striking solar panels is converted into electricity.
  3. Per square meter solar panels effectively reduce the 240 W/m² striking it by: 240 W/m² x 0.44 x 0.2 = 21.12 W/m²
Do enough of that and it adds up.

No kidding. Covering enough 0.30 albedo surface with 0.05 albedo panels adds up to more warming.
 
We've been discussing waste heat for awhile now.

Are you familiar with net zero?

The reduction needed to make the planet net cooling is 0.7 W/m² x 1.49x10^14 m² = 1.0430x10^14 W

Where does this "reduction" occur in your faulty scenario?
 
The reduction needed to make the planet net cooling is 0.7 W/m² x 1.49x10^14 m² = 1.0430x10^14 W

Where does this "reduction" occur in your faulty scenario?
Replacing fossil fuels with solar power for electrical generation.
 
And yet satellite measurements recorded 2C of localized cooling at 116 solar farms.

Raised solar panels cool faster than flat ground? I wonder why that might happen?

Does that mean energy is destroyed, or just moved?
 
Raised solar panels cool faster than flat ground? I wonder why that might happen?

Does that mean energy is destroyed, or just moved?
It means you are getting desperate. The entire reason solar power is being pushed is to cool then planet. Which seems like a really bad idea in the middle of an ice age.
 
15th post
Replacing fossil fuels with solar power for electrical generation.

You measured out the amount of area needed to cool the planet.
Do you still feel covering that area with panels cools the planet?

Or do you see the idiocy of that claim now?
 
You measured out the amount of area needed to cool the planet.
Do you still feel covering that area with panels cools the planet?

Or do you see the idiocy of that claim now?
At this point I only see your desperation.
 
Back
Top Bottom