- Mar 11, 2015
- 100,741
- 107,696
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #241
Shut the fuck up. You bitches whine about the government daily. If you don't like the first amendment, leave.
Will White Privilege End Affirmative Action?
- Thread starter IM2
- Start date
- Mar 11, 2015
- 100,741
- 107,696
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #242
Damn straight. Your white ass is misusing Douglass' words.
- Mar 11, 2015
- 100,741
- 107,696
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #245
That's a mother fucking lie and you were shown that. Stop being white trying to make comments about thinks you know absolutely nothing about. Poverty is half of what it was in the 50's and blacks get sent to prison for crimes whites get probation for. Nothing you say is correct and I am not going to debate your racist ass about this. I am telling you that you are wrong and that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
- Mar 11, 2015
- 100,741
- 107,696
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #246
You leave. I was born here and have first amendment rights. So put your pasty white ass on a boat or plane and go find a country that does have the first amendment.
- Mar 11, 2015
- 100,741
- 107,696
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #247
I am calling YOU a liar.
- Mar 11, 2015
- 100,741
- 107,696
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #251
This is an invalid argument. As is any racist argument about welfare. Because people are on TANF because they are poor, not because they want to be. So then why are more blacks poor per capita than whites?
Racism is the correct answer.
- Mar 11, 2015
- 100,741
- 107,696
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #252
That's not what the complaint is about.
- Mar 11, 2015
- 100,741
- 107,696
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #254
Taken out of context by scum.
- Mar 11, 2015
- 100,741
- 107,696
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #256
I'm going to blame racism because the facts show that white racism is the cause.
- Mar 11, 2015
- 100,741
- 107,696
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #257
No asswipe it's not.
- Mar 11, 2015
- 100,741
- 107,696
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #259
The guy is ignorant to what has gone on in Africa and South Korea is not all of Asia.
- Mar 11, 2015
- 100,741
- 107,696
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #260
As usual the racists pricks here try derailing this thread because they cannot face the truth. This thread is not about Africa, black crime, the so called loss of the black family or any of the off topic shit that has been posted.
It's about this;
“Using publicly released reports, we examine the preferences Harvard gives for recruited athletes, legacies, those on the dean’s interest list, and children of faculty and staff (ALDCs). Among white admits, over 43% are ALDC. Among admits who are African American, Asian American, and Hispanic, the share is less than 16% each.
Our model of admissions shows that roughly three quarters of white ALDC admits would have been rejected if they had been treated as white non-ALDCs.
Removing preferences for athletes and legacies would significantly alter the racial distribution of admitted students, with the share of white admits falling and all other groups rising or remaining unchanged.”
So what we see here is that whites are provided entry by a plethora of other preferences they would not qualify for if not for their race. The study shows that Asian admittance is not being stifled or reduced because Harvard must admit blacks and Hispanics that are presumably unqualified. Instead we see that it is white ALDC students who would not qualify under any other circumstance being admitted at more than double the number of Asians, blacks, Hispanics and Native Americans.
This is about unqualified whites being admitted in far higher numbers than everybody else then crying about how unfair AA is.
It's about this;
“Using publicly released reports, we examine the preferences Harvard gives for recruited athletes, legacies, those on the dean’s interest list, and children of faculty and staff (ALDCs). Among white admits, over 43% are ALDC. Among admits who are African American, Asian American, and Hispanic, the share is less than 16% each.
Our model of admissions shows that roughly three quarters of white ALDC admits would have been rejected if they had been treated as white non-ALDCs.
Removing preferences for athletes and legacies would significantly alter the racial distribution of admitted students, with the share of white admits falling and all other groups rising or remaining unchanged.”
So what we see here is that whites are provided entry by a plethora of other preferences they would not qualify for if not for their race. The study shows that Asian admittance is not being stifled or reduced because Harvard must admit blacks and Hispanics that are presumably unqualified. Instead we see that it is white ALDC students who would not qualify under any other circumstance being admitted at more than double the number of Asians, blacks, Hispanics and Native Americans.
This is about unqualified whites being admitted in far higher numbers than everybody else then crying about how unfair AA is.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
[Columbia U] Mahmoud Khalil/Joseph Massad's "bibol" of 'balestine'- Started by Sayaras
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-
