Will Trump sue Bush for war crimes?

[Ravi]

And if not, why not?

 

[Si modo]

Jurisdiction

 

[BULLDOG]

Oh, I hope he does. The entertainment value would be fantastic. I'll bet this is the first republican primary season that will be picked up for reruns on Commedy Centrial.

 

[Two Thumbs]

No, b/c there's not enough proof let alone evidence

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

And if not, why not?

How many total countries was in the coalition to take out Saddam?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

South Carolina has an open primary.
I think Trump is trying to woo over Dimocrats who hate Bush, and give them the opportunity to vote against the Bush name.

 

[GHook93]

And if not, why not?

Bush didn't commit any war crimes and even if he did Trump wouldn't have standing.

It is questionable whether he would have standing in a Cruz citizenship case, but since it affects Trump directly he probably would. Nevertheless, Trump's case would lose on summary judgement.

 

[The VOR]

Oh, I hope he does. The entertainment value would be fantastic. I'll bet this is the first republican primary season that will be picked up for reruns on Commedy Centrial.

Every four years when they roll out the KKKlown Kar, it's just more outrageous than the previous model.

 

[Ravi]

And if not, why not?

Bush didn't commit any war crimes and even if he did Trump wouldn't have standing.

It is questionable whether he would have standing in a Cruz citizenship case, but since it affects Trump directly he probably would. Nevertheless, Trump's case would lose on summary judgement.

Wouldn't Trump have standing as an American citizen?

 

[80zephyr]

And if not, why not?

Bush didn't commit any war crimes and even if he did Trump wouldn't have standing.

It is questionable whether he would have standing in a Cruz citizenship case, but since it affects Trump directly he probably would. Nevertheless, Trump's case would lose on summary judgement.

Wouldn't Trump have standing as an American citizen?

Obama could have done it, why didn't he?

Mark

 

[SwimExpert]

And if not, why not?

Are you kidding me? Trump would sue your ass for a Klondike Bar.

 

[Valerie]

oh geeez, don't give him any bright ideas..


no doubt trump would sue anyone over anything if he thought he could get something beneficial to himself out of it.

 

[easyt65]

"Buuuuuuuuuusssssssshhhhhhh'!

The clarion call of the mentally disturbed Liberal who can not leg go of Florida more than decade ago and who use Bush like a permanent crutch on which to blame whatever is going on wrong NOW....

We have so many feakin' problems that need addressing, can we drop the rabid partisan shtick, focus for a minuet, and address the problems we have NOW. To hell with the finger pointing back to dates / people in history. What is done is done, and we need people who can lead the way ahead, not political assholes and 'blame-shifters' who want to blame someone instead of attack and resolve the problem!

Damn, Libs - 'exercise that demon', already - come to grips with the past, and, as Obama's socialist slogan declares, "Forward".

 

[Valerie]

are you talking to the leading GOP presidential candidate with that random rant?

 

[amrchaos]

are you talking to the leading GOP presidential candidate with that random rant?

Of course hes not!! Projection is an arrogant lying b*tch!!

 

[easyt65]

are you talking to the leading GOP presidential candidate with that random rant?

I'm talking to Trump, I am talking to Republicans, I am talking about Liberals who can't go a day without blaming 'Buuuuusssshh' for something despite the fact that he hasn't been president for approx. a decade. I'm talking to ANYONE who focuses on petty partisan bickering about things that have happened in the past.

What we pretty much need is someone who has 'political amnesia' - they can't remember / don't know anything about the past, HOW we got where we are. We need someone who will SEE THE PROBLEM, doesn't give a damn how the problem came about, and can devise a plan to deal with the problem - what he is 'introduced' to. Looking back and blaming others wastes time and doesn't fix the problem.

 

[Ravi]

And if not, why not?

Bush didn't commit any war crimes and even if he did Trump wouldn't have standing.

It is questionable whether he would have standing in a Cruz citizenship case, but since it affects Trump directly he probably would. Nevertheless, Trump's case would lose on summary judgement.

Wouldn't Trump have standing as an American citizen?

Obama could have done it, why didn't he?

Mark

Because Obama has the country's best interests at heart.

 

[easyt65]

Of course hes not!! Projection is an arrogant lying b*tch!!

Paper, is that YOU...or just ANOTHER useless Liberal PO$ who can't contribute anything except personal attacks to an intellectual debate?!

 

[easyt65]

"Obama could have done it, why didn't he? - Mark"

President Bush took the country to war with the full authorization of a bi-partisan Congress. The Liberals, like Hillary Clinton, who voted to give him that authorization did not just vote for his ability to do so but also spoke with passion on the floor of congress declaring why it had to be done.

Obama, on the other hand, took the nation to war, to help Al Qaeida - the perpetrators of both 9/11/01 and 9/11/12, take over their own country. He did so WITHOUT the authorization from Congress. We did not have to rush into such a war - there was no critical need or imminent threat that required us to jump headlong into a war. Obama bypassed Congress ,though, because he KNEW there was no way in hell he could make an argument for overthrowing Qaddafi helping his assassination, and for putting Al Qaeida - the butchers of thousands of Americans - in power in Libya!

Obama didn't want to go anywhere near charging Bush with 'War Crimes' because people would / might begin to compare the 2 wars. If ANYONE should be brought up on 'War Crimes' it should be Obama. Hillary should be brought up on charges of Gross Negligence in the death of Ambassador Stevens, for leaving him to die when every other nation pulled their people out of Benghazi due to the threats, for denying his more that 600 please for additional security, and for taking 14 members of his security team away AFTER 2 terrorist attacks on his compound...before his death.

 

[80zephyr]

And if not, why not?

Bush didn't commit any war crimes and even if he did Trump wouldn't have standing.

It is questionable whether he would have standing in a Cruz citizenship case, but since it affects Trump directly he probably would. Nevertheless, Trump's case would lose on summary judgement.

Wouldn't Trump have standing as an American citizen?

Obama could have done it, why didn't he?

Mark

Because Obama has the country's best interests at heart.

Lol.

Mark