Will repubs cave in again on DHS funding and amnesty?

[Missouri_Mike]

This shouldn't even be an issue. Send obie the damn DHS funding without amnesty and let the dems stop it. Then just hit the airwaves and claim correctly the dems care more about illegals than your safety.

You don't understand how laws are passed. They can't send the bill to obama until the senate passes it and the senate dems won't let it come up for a vote.

I do understand how that works. All the congress has to do is send a bill to the senate with all DHS provisions paid for without funding for the illegals. Then let the senate democrats block it. And when they do point at the malls being threatened and how the dems won't fund it because they want illegals to get amnesty and see where that goes. You will get that budget passed in a day if you aren't a pussy trying to appease a bunch of dem assholes.

All they have to do is stand on their principles and the fucking deems have no choice but to cave. DHS funding is now out there for dems to fuck up. Keep the pressure on them. Fund the DHS for American safety or refuse that funding in favor of illegals getting provisions.

I'd play that game all day long on the air waves.

No one is going to stand in the way a clean bill, dummy. Security is another third-rail of politics.

Then why are the dems not passing it without their illegal amnesty pay off portion?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

This shouldn't even be an issue. Send obie the damn DHS funding without amnesty and let the dems stop it. Then just hit the airwaves and claim correctly the dems care more about illegals than your safety.

You don't understand how laws are passed. They can't send the bill to obama until the senate passes it and the senate dems won't let it come up for a vote.

I do understand how that works. All the congress has to do is send a bill to the senate with all DHS provisions paid for without funding for the illegals. Then let the senate democrats block it. And when they do point at the malls being threatened and how the dems won't fund it because they want illegals to get amnesty and see where that goes. You will get that budget passed in a day if you aren't a pussy trying to appease a bunch of dem assholes.

All they have to do is stand on their principles and the fucking deems have no choice but to cave. DHS funding is now out there for dems to fuck up. Keep the pressure on them. Fund the DHS for American safety or refuse that funding in favor of illegals getting provisions.

I'd play that game all day long on the air waves.

No one is going to stand in the way a clean bill, dummy. Security is another third-rail of politics.

Then why are the dems not passing it without their illegal amnesty pay off portion?

They aren't, dummy. They want a clean bill.

"In a 47 to 46 vote, Democrats blocked GOP efforts to advance a bill that would defund President Barack Obama's executive actions on immigration while ensuring Homeland Security remains paid for."
Senate Fails to Advance Homeland Security Funding Bill as Deadline Looms - NBC News

And

"If Congress fails to act by midnight on Friday, 30,000 Homeland Security employees will be furloughed. About 200,000 employees will need to continue to work without pay until the funding dispute is resolved."

Go for it boys, I dare you to.

 

[1stRambo]

Yo, if Mitch McConnell splits the Bill, he just as well shine Obama`s shoes!!! And Put A Big T on His Forehead!!!!!

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Yo, if Mitch McConnell splits the Bill, he just as well shine Obama`s shoes!!! And Put A Big T on His Forehead!!!!!

And there we go, the pitchforks will be calling for heads, GOP heads.

 

[1stRambo]

Yo, you got it son!

 

[Katzndogz]

Obamnesty is already illegal. It shouldn't getca dime.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Will repubs cave in again on DHS funding and amnesty?"

Congressional republicans doing their job and funding a Federal agency as the law requires does not constitute 'caving,' particularly given the fact the president's EO isn't 'amnesty.'

That Congressional republicans would hold hostage a Federal agency tasked with protecting the American people for purely subjective, partisan reasons is reprehensible – typical of many on the right.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Time for Republicans to pull a Harry Reid and just shut the Democrats down. Then pass the bill and let Obama wear the shutdown because it will be his very own little pen that's pulling the plug.

Wake up Republicans. It's time for hardball.

Repubs can easily do that by ending the filibuster rule. But they don't have the guts.

 

[HenryBHough]

Republicans up for re-election in 2016 cave at their own risk.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

"

That Congressional republicans would hold hostage a Federal agency tasked with protecting the American people for purely subjective, partisan reasons is reprehensible – typical of many on the right.

DHS is not protecting us. They are letting millions of UNSCREENED disease-ridden illegals invade america every year.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Again i say - all repubs have to do is end the filibuster rule. Then any DHS shutdown will be obama's fault. Why won't they?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Republicans up for re-election in 2016 cave at their own risk.

It will be very fun to watch, when the people you were just recently so proud of electing you now want to throw out.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

"

That Congressional republicans would hold hostage a Federal agency tasked with protecting the American people for purely subjective, partisan reasons is reprehensible – typical of many on the right.

DHS is not protecting us. They are letting millions of UNSCREENED disease-ridden illegals invade america every year.

Millions? What a moron you are.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Again i say - all repubs have to do is end the filibuster rule. Then any DHS shutdown will be obama's fault. Why won't they?

Because they know in two years they are going to lose the Senate again.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

DHS is not protecting us. They are letting millions of UNSCREENED disease-ridden illegals invade america every year.

Millions? What a moron you are.

The board notes you never addressed the issue and merely made a personal attack. Thanks for admitting you have nothing.

 

[bendog]

Is McConnell now proposing a simple no-ties bill to fund Homeland Sec (a misnomer if there is one) and also a second bill to provide no funds may be used to expand immigration? I read he's got a Plan B now, but frankly I didn't understand it.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Because they know in two years they are going to lose the Senate again.

If they dont stop amnesty they will lose the senate. The voters want amnesty ended.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Because they know in two years they are going to lose the Senate again.

If they dont stop amnesty they will lose the senate. The voters want amnesty ended.

At this point they can't stop anything at all, and they know it.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Is McConnell now proposing a simple no-ties bill to fund Homeland Sec (a misnomer if there is one) and also a second bill to provide no funds may be used to expand immigration? I read he's got a Plan B now, but frankly I didn't understand it.

That's what he's proposing but then obama will sign the first bill and veto the second and repubs don't have the votes to override the veto. It's another mitch sellout. He's doing what his corporate handlers tell him.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Is McConnell now proposing a simple no-ties bill to fund Homeland Sec (a misnomer if there is one) and also a second bill to provide no funds may be used to expand immigration? I read he's got a Plan B now, but frankly I didn't understand it.

He can't get a dirty bill through the Senate, so he's splitting the baby to get that part he has to have that isn't what you little morons want.