Will Minority Voters For Clinton Turn Out For Trump Instead? (USA Today Thinks So?!)

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
A fellow named "James," appears to have signed his name to a tract comparing Nixon's "Silent Majority" turnout to a Turnout for Donald Trump: With basis in the Trump supporters having blockaded the Trump event in Chicago. It is nowhere widely noted that preventing entry of dissidents and minority group members, may have been the actual motive of the supporters, outside the event. Sanders campaign members can be included in that description of who was being blockaded from lawful entry into the event(?). Even Trump wondered where the Clinton supporters were, in the crowd: Not too up on the recent election turnouts in the South(?).

If anti-Trump protests grow, they could hand Donald the election: James Robbins

Then tongue-sticking-out(?), "James" reminds everyone of the thousands of police and National Guard at the 1968 Chicago Democratic Convention, citing no comparison(?). No comparison is also made with population demographics, or Roman Imperial concepts of "Greatness" for America. The United States would more likely look monstrous billing an economically disadvantaged population for an "aesthetic" fence, for staring at, at a price of some souvenirs. It was already monstrous, terrorizing poor revolutionaries in Southeast Asia. "Making America Great Again," may have a slip showing(?), from an effeminate Trump-Nixon dress(?).

The Trump Health Plan will add $0.5 tril. dollars to the Federal Deficit, and thow 20.0 mil. people out of medical coverage. Now there is getting back to basics, like the "Gold Old Nixon Days(?)!"

That aside, the United States is now more the make-up of a United Nations, as opposed to a "Law and Order," loving, White population more accustomed to derogatory names and job-titles for non-white peoples.

In Hollywood, "James" Robbins can at least change his name, and maybe do well! In fact, anymore, probably so could Richard, "Nixon," which tends to sound, even, White.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Maybe pretty wall able to become venue for North American dice game kind of venue!)
 
So the Trump minority white, low-skilled, low-paid, pretensions at ascendancy go back to a minority sub-culture, of a former majority culture in America.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Former widely known sub-culture of Americans, former majority culture in America--on Lands of Many Nations--only Long Ago!)
 
Trump won't win the White House. Trump and his supporters have chased off every minority voting block you can shake a stick at. Specifically 17% of the population, or 23 million voters, Hispanics. They are now solidly in Hillary Clinton's column. This when the GOP nominee, historically since Reagan needs 40% of this block to win the White House. This year they need 46% to win, and Trump is polling at a Negative 80%. Even Republican Latino's stated months ago they will not support a Trump nominee. Blacks won't vote for anyone that has been endorsed by every white supremacist hate group in this country, including the KKK.
GOP Win Will Need More Than 40 Percent Of Latino 2016 Vote, Says Study
Poll: 75% of Latinos Have Negative View of Donald Trump
Latino conservatives: If Donald Trump is the nominee, we will not work to elect him

Republicans are the minority party at 41 million, Democrats are stronger at 46 million, and independents make up for the largest block representing 40% of the entire electorate.

30-50% of the Republican party will not vote for a Trump nominee. These are real Republicans who know who Trump is and what policies he has supported in the past.
McConnell Tells GOP Senators: We’ll Drop Trump ‘Like A Hot Rock’
Let’s Elect Hillary Now
I’ll Take Hillary Clinton Over Donald Trump

Women the largest voting block in this country today, at 54% will be voting heavily for the 1st woman President in this nation's history.

These numbers are already indicating a landslide victory for Hillary Clinton.

-9eccb5159ae06db8.jpg
 
The myopia of a White racially biased press corps was able to surface over the Weekend Of The Trump Blockade of Chicago. No one so-stated is how anyone knows. Even the Republican front-runner was Monday commenting that his clearly closed racially, political rallies are not violent..

He invokes racial animosity which clearly creates interest in an anti-racial animosity crowd. The crowd is blockaded from attending one or more rallies. Then any appeal of the rallies is more like a Euro-Parliament strategy hoping for a faction--not a ruling majority.

Boehner tried that. Nothing happened in the House. The Democrats were trapped into the small-states dominated Midterms. In the United States, where nobody lives: Became the majority coalition. Anyone might conclude that since nobody lives where the Republican Majorities happen, then nothing happened. It turns out they had no coalition, even of themselves.

That viewpoint is not press corps dominant. The concept of a White Silent Majority was shown to be a pitiful minority of backward, animosity reacting people: Fifty years after the Nixon "Southern Strategy" was originally put in place. The recent primary elections, mostly Southern, show how it works even now.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Maybe humor now different from Nixon decade: "What to White Crackers want? Loose Shoes and a Warm Place to Shit," as Secretary Early Butz did not so-state it. half a century ago.)
 

Forum List

Back
Top