Will ANYONE in the government be held accountable for violations of the first amendment via Twitter?

[Skylar]

It also doesn't say it's illegal for the government to shut down Twitter. Do you think that's legal for the government to do, eh dumbfuck? Do you think the Constitution has to spell out every single thing that the First Amendment doesn't allow the government to do? Do ya, NAZI?

When did the government shut down twitter? Say it with me: In your imagination.

When you can cite the law that congress passed that forced Twitter to take down those posts, then you can complain about 1st amendment violations.

Until then, its just you, raging impotently in ignorance. As there is no prohibition on the FBI making requests that Twitter can choose to grant or ignore.

 

[Skylar]

You're the one who is imploding, douche nozzle.

Says you, citing yourself as the supreme legal authority.

Has that ever worked out?

 

[Skylar]

To anyone but the most partisan it is clear that first amendment violations are abundant but will ANYONE be held to account for it?

If not our so called constitutional rights are nothing but a figment of our imagination IMO.

What first amendment violations?

 

[Unkotare]

To anyone but the most partisan it is clear that first amendment violations are abundant but will ANYONE be held to account for it?

If not our so called constitutional rights are nothing but a figment of our imagination IMO.

????????????????????????????

 

[bripat9643]

When did the government shut down twitter? Say it with me: In your imagination.

I doesn't. But according to you it can because the First Amendment doesn't expressly prohibit it.

All you're doing here is confirming that you are a dumbass who is unable to commit logic.

When you can cite the law that congress passed that forced Twitter to take down those posts, then you can complain about 1st amendment violations.

You can't stop now. We already understand waht a colossal dumbass you are.

Until then, its just you, raging impotently in ignorance. As there is no prohibition on the FBI making requests that Twitter can choose to grant or ignore.

 

[Unkotare]

...a bureau of non-elected eggheads like the FBI ....

"eggheads"??????????????

 

[Skylar]

I doesn't. But according to you it can because the First Amendment doesn't expressly prohibit it.

All you're doing here is confirming that you are a dumbass who is unable to commit logic.


You can't stop now. We already understand waht a colossal dumbass you are.

So what in the first amendment prohibits the FBI from making requests of Twitter that can be granted or ignored?

Quote the section of the 1st amendment specifically that makes this illegal.

 

[bripat9643]

So what in the first amendment prohibits the FBI from making requests of Twitter that can be granted or ignored?

Quote the section of the 1st amendment specifically that makes this illegal.

The part that says "freedom of speech shall not be abridged"

 

[Skylar]

The part that says "freedom of speech shall not be abridged"

The phrase 'freedom of speech shall not be abridged' is not in the 1st amendment. You're paraphrasing the 1st amendment. Quote it directly.

I'll even guide you to the text, as you've clearly never read it:

U.S. Constitution - First Amendment | Resources | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

The original text of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.

constitution.congress.gov

Try again. What in the first amendment prohibits the FBI from making requests of Twitter that can be granted or ignored?

 

[Faun]

The FBI told them to censor those users, dumbass. Unconstitutional actions don't suddenly become constitutional because the FBI outsources them to a private firm.

You are NAZI to the bone.

No they didn't. They asked them to. Some Twitter did, others they did not. It was always under Twitter's discretion.

 

[Skylar]

No they didn't. They asked them to. Some Twitter did, others they did not. It was always under Twitter's discretion.

Without a law that required Twitter to comply, its just impotent rage and pseudo-legal gibberish from Bri.

And no such law exists. The FBI made requests, Twitter chose to honor or ignore them.

 

[Faun]

They instructed Twitter to censor people, dumb fuck. It doesn't matter whether it comes in the form of a command or a request or a suggestion, it's illegal.

Time to go lick Herr Obergruppenfuhrer's boots

As always, you prove to be a fucking moron.

"requesting the following:"

 

[Faun]

They broke the law by even asking.

You are a NAZI to the fucking bone if you don't have a problem with it.

A government employee getting a government salary told them to do it during working hours.

LOL

Nope, there's no law preventing them from asking Twitter to enforce Twitter's terms of service. You saying there is, is utterly meaningless. Laughable coming from a fucking moron like you.

 

[bripat9643]

LOL

Nope, there's no law preventing them from asking Twitter to enforce Twitter's terms of service. You saying there is, is utterly meaningless. Laughable coming from a fucking moron like you.

Yes there is turd. It's called the First Amendment. Only brain damaged NAZI retards don't understand that the FBI is bound by the Bill of Rights.

 

[bripat9643]

No they didn't. They asked them to. Some Twitter did, others they did not. It was always under Twitter's discretion.

Whether they said "please" or not doesn't matter.

 

[Faun]

Yes there is turd. It's called the First Amendment. Only brain damaged NAZI retards don't understand that the FBI is bound by the Bill of Rights.

LOL

You're not the interpreter of the First Amendment. You're the USMB's fucking moron.

 

[Faun]

Whether they said "please" or not doesn't matter.

What matters is who blocked users and content on Twitter; and that was Twitter who did that, not the FBI.

 

[bripat9643]

LOL

Nope, there's no law preventing them from asking Twitter to enforce Twitter's terms of service. You saying there is, is utterly meaningless. Laughable coming from a fucking moron like you.

What you're saying is that there is no law preventing them from violating the First Amendment.

You're an idiot.

 

[bripat9643]

LOL

You're not the interpreter of the First Amendment. You're the USMB's fucking moron.

Everyone is an interpreter of the First Amendment. Unfortunately that includes NAZIs like you.

 

[bripat9643]

What matters is who blocked users and content on Twitter; and that was Twitter who did that, not the FBI.

They did it at the request of the FBI, which is illegal for it to do. The government cannot ask private companies to violate the Bill of Rights.